University of Georgia, United States of America.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States of America.
J Sch Psychol. 2020 Oct;82:36-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2020.07.001. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
In addition to being involved and encouraging their youth academically, many African American caregivers also employ socialization practices that prepare their adolescents for entering into a school system where they will be an ethnic minority or be taught by predominantly non-minority educators. The purpose of the current investigation was to fill existing gaps in the literature by examining two dimensions of parental socialization practices: academic socialization (parent school involvement and academic encouragement) and racial socialization (cultural pride, preparation for bias, and egalitarian messages). Additionally, this study examined how the identified profiles are associated with African American adolescents' academic outcomes (academic engagement and academic self-beliefs). A latent profile analysis was utilized to analyze data on 140 African American adolescent participants (M = 12.4; SD = 1.13; 56% female). Profiles that were identified included (a) academic socializers, (b) low race salient socializers, (c) preparation for bias socializers, (d) unengaged socializers, (e) multifaceted socializers, and (f) race salient socializers. Although there was no demographic (age, gender, SES) variation in profile membership, there were some differences in academic engagement and adolescents' academic-self beliefs. Findings highlight the importance of examining how academic and racial socialization work together and their association with adolescents' academic outcomes. Implications are discussed for school psychologists and educators.
除了在学业上参与和鼓励他们的年轻人外,许多非裔美国照顾者还采用社会化实践,为青少年进入学校系统做准备,在这个系统中,他们将成为少数民族,或者由主要是非少数民族的教育工作者来教授。本研究的目的是通过考察父母社会化实践的两个维度(学业社会化[父母参与学校和学业鼓励]和种族社会化[文化自豪感、对偏见的准备和平等主义信息])来填补文献中的现有空白。此外,本研究还探讨了所确定的模式如何与非裔美国青少年的学业成果(学业参与度和学业自我信念)相关。利用潜在剖面分析对 140 名非裔美国青少年参与者(M=12.4;SD=1.13;56%为女性)的数据进行了分析。确定的模式包括:(a)学业社会化者,(b)低种族显著社会化者,(c)准备偏见的社会化者,(d)不参与的社会化者,(e)多方面的社会化者,以及(f)种族显著社会化者。尽管在模式成员的人口统计学(年龄、性别、社会经济地位)方面没有差异,但在学业参与度和青少年的学业自我信念方面存在一些差异。研究结果强调了考察学业和种族社会化如何共同作用及其与青少年学业成果的关联的重要性。为学校心理学家和教育工作者讨论了相关影响。