Akinyemi Oluwasegun A, Fasokun Mojisola E, Weldeslase Terhas Asfiha, Adeoye Oluwatayo, Coleman Pamela W
Health Policy and Management, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, USA.
Surgery, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA.
Cureus. 2023 Jun 24;15(6):e40909. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40909. eCollection 2023 Jun.
Penile cancer, while relatively rare in developed nations, presents substantial disparities in outcomes among different demographic groups. Previous research has shown race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status, often proxied by household median income, to be critical determinants of health outcomes across various diseases.
This study examines the association of race/ethnicity and household median income with survival among penile cancer patients in the United States.
We utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Registry to identify patients with a primary diagnosis of penile malignancies from 2000 to 2019. Our primary outcome of interest was the hazard of death following a diagnosis of penile cancer. We utilized the Cox regression model to explore the association between race/ethnicity and median household income and how this influences survival among these patients. We adjusted for patients' characteristics, disease stage at presentation, and treatment modalities.
Of the 6,520 penile cancer patients identified, 5,242 (80.4%) had primary malignancies. The distribution of patients was as follows: 64.1% non-Hispanic Whites, 8.9% non-Hispanic Blacks, 20.8% Hispanics, and 6.2% from other racial/ethnic groups. The median diagnosis age was 66 years (interquartile range: 56-74). Survival rates at 5, 10, and 15 years showed racial disparities: 76.4%, 72.5%, and 69.7% for non-Hispanic Whites; 70.6%, 64.1%, and 61.1% for non-Hispanic Blacks; and 70.5%, 67.4%, and 65.6% for Hispanics. Multivariate Cox regression revealed worst survival for Black (HR=1.40; 95% CI=1.08-1.81, p=0.01) and Hispanic patients (HR=1.24; 95% CI=1.01-1.52, p=0.04). No association was found between median household income and survival. Interaction analysis indicated that the poorest Black men had worse outcomes than the poorest Whites did (HR=2.08; 95% CI=1.27-3.41, p=0.003).
Survival rates for non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients are significantly lower than those for non-Hispanic Whites. Furthermore, survival is worse for low-income Black patients than their White counterparts in the same income bracket.
阴茎癌在发达国家相对少见,但在不同人口群体中的治疗结果存在显著差异。先前的研究表明,种族/族裔以及通常以家庭收入中位数来衡量的社会经济地位,是各类疾病健康结果的关键决定因素。
本研究调查了美国阴茎癌患者的种族/族裔及家庭收入中位数与生存率之间的关联。
我们利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)登记处的数据,确定了2000年至2019年期间初诊为阴茎恶性肿瘤的患者。我们感兴趣的主要结果是阴茎癌诊断后的死亡风险。我们使用Cox回归模型来探究种族/族裔与家庭收入中位数之间的关联,以及这如何影响这些患者的生存率。我们对患者的特征、就诊时的疾病阶段和治疗方式进行了调整。
在确定的6520例阴茎癌患者中,5242例(80.4%)患有原发性恶性肿瘤。患者分布如下:64.1%为非西班牙裔白人,8.9%为非西班牙裔黑人,20.8%为西班牙裔,6.2%来自其他种族/族裔群体。诊断时的中位年龄为66岁(四分位间距:56 - 74岁)。5年、10年和15年的生存率显示出种族差异:非西班牙裔白人分别为76.4%、72.5%和69.7%;非西班牙裔黑人分别为70.6%、64.1%和61.1%;西班牙裔分别为70.5%、67.4%和65.6%。多因素Cox回归显示黑人(风险比[HR]=1.40;95%置信区间[CI]=1.08 - 1.81,p = 0.01)和西班牙裔患者(HR = 1.24;95% CI = 1.01 - 1.52,p = 0.04)的生存率最差。未发现家庭收入中位数与生存率之间存在关联。交互分析表明,最贫困的黑人男性比最贫困的白人男性预后更差(HR = 2.08;95% CI = 1.27 - 3.41,p = 0.003)。
非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔患者的生存率显著低于非西班牙裔白人。此外,低收入黑人患者的生存率比同收入水平的白人患者更差。