• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

因胃肠道出血住院患者 1 型和 2 型心肌梗死对心血管预后的 6 个月影响。

Six-month cardiovascular prognostic impact of type 1 And type 2 myocardial infarction in patients hospitalized for gastrointestinal bleeding.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 E Adam St, Syracuse, NY 13202, United States.

Department of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 E Adam St, Syracuse, NY 13202, United States.

出版信息

Eur J Intern Med. 2023 Oct;116:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.07.015. Epub 2023 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejim.2023.07.015
PMID:37500309
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) are at an increased risk of cardiovascular events and myocardial infarction (MI). Myocardial supply-demand mismatch results in type 2 MI(T2MI) and atherosclerotic plaque rupture leads to type 1 MI(T1MI). Data comparing the prognostic impact of these MI types in GIB are sparse.

METHODS

Patients hospitalized for GIB were identified in the 2019 US Nationwide Readmissions Sample. In this population, we studied the differences in management of T1MI and T2MI, and the association of these MI types with in-hospital mortality and risk for 6-month MI and MI-related mortality.

RESULTS

Of 444,475 patients admitted for a GIB, 12,860 (2.9%) had an MI (1.7% T2MI, 1.2% T1MI). Patients with T1MI were more likely to receive coronary angiography and revascularization than patients with T2MI. In-hospital mortality occurred in 2.0% patients, at a significantly higher rate in patients with an MI (7.9% vs 1.8%; P < 0.001), and higher with T1MI (11.9%) than T2MI (5.3%; P < 0.001). Among the survivors, 2.2% patient had an MI within 6 months, at a significantly higher rate in patients with index MI (13.1% vs 2.0%, adjusted OR 4.3 95% CI 3.83-4.90; P < 0.001). Mortality during the subsequent MI occurred in 0.3% of all patients (12% with an MI), at a 6-fold higher rate in patients with index MI (1.7% vs 0.3%; adjusted OR 3.69 95% CI 2.75-4.95; P < 0.001). The elevated risks were associated with both MI types. The risks for 6-month MI and related mortality were similar between T1MI and T2MI (6-month AMI: adjusted OR for T2MI = 1.03, 95% 0.83-1.29; fatal MI: adjusted OR for T2MI = 1.5, 95% CI 0.85-2.7).

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of an MI is associated with a substantially elevated risk for subsequent AMI and related mortality in patients hospitalized for a GIB. This future prognostic impact was similar between T1MI and T2MI.

摘要

背景

胃肠道出血 (GIB) 患者发生心血管事件和心肌梗死 (MI) 的风险增加。心肌供需不匹配导致 2 型 MI(T2MI),动脉粥样硬化斑块破裂导致 1 型 MI(T1MI)。比较这些 MI 类型在 GIB 中的预后影响的数据很少。

方法

在美国 2019 年全国再入院样本中确定因 GIB 住院的患者。在该人群中,我们研究了 T1MI 和 T2MI 的管理差异,以及这些 MI 类型与住院死亡率以及 6 个月 MI 和 MI 相关死亡率风险的关系。

结果

在因 GIB 住院的 444475 名患者中,有 12860 名(2.9%)发生了 MI(1.7% T2MI,1.2% T1MI)。与 T2MI 患者相比,T1MI 患者更有可能接受冠状动脉造影和血运重建。住院死亡率为 2.0%,MI 患者的死亡率明显更高(7.9% vs 1.8%;P<0.001),且 T1MI 患者(11.9%)高于 T2MI 患者(5.3%;P<0.001)。在幸存者中,2.2%的患者在 6 个月内发生 MI,指数 MI 患者的发生率明显更高(13.1% vs 2.0%,调整后的 OR 4.3,95%CI 3.83-4.90;P<0.001)。所有患者中有 0.3%(MI 患者中有 12%)在随后的 MI 期间死亡,指数 MI 患者的死亡率高出 6 倍(1.7% vs 0.3%;调整后的 OR 3.69,95%CI 2.75-4.95;P<0.001)。这些风险与两种 MI 类型均相关。6 个月时 MI 和相关死亡率的风险在 T1MI 和 T2MI 之间相似(6 个月时 AMI:T2MI 的调整后 OR=1.03,95%CI 0.83-1.29;致命性 MI:T2MI 的调整后 OR=1.5,95%CI 0.85-2.7)。

结论

在因 GIB 住院的患者中,MI 的发生与随后发生 AMI 和相关死亡率的风险显著增加相关。这种未来的预后影响在 T1MI 和 T2MI 之间相似。

相似文献

1
Six-month cardiovascular prognostic impact of type 1 And type 2 myocardial infarction in patients hospitalized for gastrointestinal bleeding.因胃肠道出血住院患者 1 型和 2 型心肌梗死对心血管预后的 6 个月影响。
Eur J Intern Med. 2023 Oct;116:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.07.015. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
2
Mortality following myocardial infarction among HIV-infected persons: the Center for AIDS Research Network Of Integrated Clinical Systems (CNICS).HIV 感染者心肌梗死后的死亡率:艾滋病研究中心网络综合临床系统(CNICS)。
BMC Med. 2019 Jul 31;17(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1385-7.
3
Type 2 myocardial infarction: A descriptive analysis and comparison with type 1 myocardial infarction.2型心肌梗死:一项描述性分析及与1型心肌梗死的比较
J Cardiol. 2016 Jan;67(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 May 5.
4
Incidence, Trends, and Outcomes of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in a Community Cohort.2 型心肌梗死在社区队列中的发病率、趋势和结局。
Circulation. 2020 Feb 11;141(6):454-463. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043100. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
5
Twelve-Month Outcomes of Patients With Myocardial Injury not Due to Type-1 Myocardial Infarction.非 1 型心肌梗死导致的心肌损伤患者的 12 个月结局。
Heart Lung Circ. 2023 Aug;32(8):978-985. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2023.04.299. Epub 2023 May 22.
6
Diagnostic features, management and prognosis of type 2 myocardial infarction compared to type 1 myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与 1 型心肌梗死相比,2 型心肌梗死的诊断特征、治疗和预后:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 17;12(2):e055755. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055755.
7
Characteristics and occurrence of type 2 myocardial infarction in emergency department patients: a prospective study.急诊科患者 2 型心肌梗死的特征和发生情况:一项前瞻性研究。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Mar;35(3):169-175. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-206869. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
8
Diagnostic and prognostic impact of new pathophysiology-based categorization of type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction: data from the French RICO survey.新基于病理生理学的 1 型和 2 型心肌梗死分类对诊断和预后的影响:来自法国 RICO 调查的数据。
Am Heart J. 2023 Dec;266:86-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
9
Polygenic risk scores point toward potential genetic mechanisms of type 2 myocardial infarction in people with HIV.多基因风险评分指向 HIV 感染者 2 型心肌梗死的潜在遗传机制。
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Jul 15;383:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.04.058. Epub 2023 May 4.
10
Incidence and outcomes of high bleeding risk patients with type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction in a community-based cohort: Application of the Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk Criteria.基于社区队列的 1 型和 2 型心肌梗死患者高出血风险的发生率和结局:应用学术研究联合会高出血风险标准。
Int J Cardiol. 2024 Feb 1;396:131565. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131565. Epub 2023 Oct 30.