Département des Sciences Cliniques, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC, J2S 2M2 Canada.
Lactanet, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, H9X3R4 Canada.
J Dairy Sci. 2023 Sep;106(9):6263-6274. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-23227. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
The objective of this cross-sectional study was to standardize a reliable and repeatable swabbing technique using ATP luminometry (light emission proportional to the amount of ATP with result provided in relative light units [RLU]) to describe the cleanliness of various feeding equipment used for preweaning calves in dairy farms. A total of 7 Québec commercial dairy herds were selected conveniently. Following visual hygiene scoring, the cleanliness of every available piece of feeding equipment was assessed using direct surface swabbing for buckets and nipples with Hygiena UltraSnap swabs. A liquid rinsing technique was used for esophageal feeders, bottles, and automatic milk feeders (AMF) with UltraSnap, AquaSnap, and MicroSnap swabs. To validate direct swabbing technique of buckets, a stage within and between operators was realized, as well as a conventional bacterial culture. A total of 519 swab samples were obtained from 201 pieces of equipment. The median (interquartile range) contamination in RLU for a bottle, esophageal feeder, AMF, bucket and nipple was 2 (1;6), 2 (0;12), 52 (19;269), 886 (128;7,230) and 899 (142;6,928), respectively. The direct swabbing technique, which consists in swabbing directly the surface of an equipment, showed excellent correlation for intrarater reliability (intraclass correlation (ICC) = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.88-0.96). The interoperator (2 sessions with 3 different operators) reliability also showed high correlation (ICC = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.78-0.94 for the first session, and ICC = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.79-0.95 for the second session). Luminometer values were positively associated with the visual score of esophageal feeders, AMF and buckets. A positive correlation between bacterial culture and direct swabbing of buckets was also found for the UltraSnap (r = 0.653; 95% CI: 0.283-0.873; P = 0.0003) and MicroSnap (r = 0.569, 95% CI: 0.309-0.765; P = 0.002). This study describes a standardized and practical on-farm swabbing technique for assessing the hygienic status of feeding equipment by luminometry, which can be integrated in the investigation of preweaning dairy calves problems.
本横断面研究的目的是使用 ATP 发光计(发光与 ATP 量成正比,结果以相对发光单位 [RLU] 提供)标准化一种可靠且可重复的擦拭技术,以描述用于犊牛预饲的各种喂养设备的清洁度在奶牛场。总共选择了 7 个魁北克商业奶牛场。在进行视觉卫生评分后,使用 Hygiena UltraSnap 拭子对每个可用的喂养设备进行直接表面擦拭,对桶和奶嘴进行清洁度评估。使用液体冲洗技术对食管饲喂器、奶瓶和自动牛奶饲喂器(AMF)进行清洁,使用 UltraSnap、AquaSnap 和 MicroSnap 拭子进行清洁。为了验证桶的直接擦拭技术,在操作员内部和之间进行了一个阶段,以及传统的细菌培养。共从 201 件设备中获得了 519 个拭子样本。瓶、食管饲喂器、AMF、桶和奶嘴的 RLU 污染中位数(四分位距)分别为 2(1;6)、2(0;12)、52(19;269)、886(128;7,230)和 899(142;6,928)。直接擦拭技术是指直接擦拭设备表面,其在评估内部可靠性方面具有出色的相关性(组内相关系数(ICC)=0.93;95%置信区间(CI):0.88-0.96)。操作员之间的可靠性(2 次会议,3 名不同的操作员)也显示出高度相关性(第一次会议的 ICC = 0.88;95%CI:0.78-0.94,第二次会议的 ICC = 0.89;95%CI:0.79-0.95)。光度计值与食管饲喂器、AMF 和桶的视觉评分呈正相关。还发现直接擦拭桶与细菌培养之间存在正相关UltraSnap(r = 0.653;95%CI:0.283-0.873;P = 0.0003)和 MicroSnap(r = 0.569,95%CI:0.309-0.765;P = 0.002)。本研究描述了一种标准化的、实用的农场拭子技术,用于通过发光计评估喂养设备的卫生状况,该技术可用于调查犊牛预饲问题。