Mills G H, Davies G K, Getty C J, Conway J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986 Jun;11(5):427-32. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198606000-00005.
The role of liquid crystal thermography (LCT) in the investigation of nerve root compression due to lumbosacral lateral spinal stenosis was evaluated using a quantitative analysis technique. In 28 healthy volunteers, normal lower limb dermatomal asymmetry was found to follow a Gaussian distribution, with a normal range of less than 1.0 degree for the lower limbs and less than 1.9 degrees for the feet. The results of LCT from a patient group were compared with those from other investigations, with the following results: clinical assessment (107 patients), 53% agreement; myelography (60 patients), 45% agreement; computerized tomography (35 patients), 46% agreement; electromyography (27 patients), 41% agreement; and surgical findings (19 patients), 53% agreement. Each method of investigation was compared against the surgeon's final overall assessment. Clinical assessment agreed in 76%, myelography in 71%, computerized tomography in 71%, and electromyography in 70%. However, agreement could be demonstrated in only 48% of cases using LCT; therefore, it would appear that LCT is by far the least reliable of these techniques in the diagnosis of nerve root compression.
采用定量分析技术评估了液晶热成像(LCT)在腰骶部外侧椎管狭窄导致神经根受压的研究中的作用。在28名健康志愿者中,发现正常下肢皮节不对称呈高斯分布,下肢正常范围小于1.0度,足部小于1.9度。将患者组的LCT结果与其他检查结果进行比较,结果如下:临床评估(107例患者),一致性为53%;脊髓造影(60例患者),一致性为45%;计算机断层扫描(35例患者),一致性为46%;肌电图(27例患者),一致性为41%;手术结果(19例患者),一致性为53%。将每种检查方法与外科医生的最终总体评估进行比较。临床评估的一致性为76%,脊髓造影为71%,计算机断层扫描为71%,肌电图为70%。然而,使用LCT时仅在48%的病例中能显示出一致性;因此,在诊断神经根受压方面,LCT似乎是这些技术中最不可靠的。