• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《鼻窦结局测试-12 版的制定与验证》

Development and Validation of the Sinonasal Outcome Test-12.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Saudi Arabia.

Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231189060. doi: 10.1177/21501319231189060.

DOI:10.1177/21501319231189060
PMID:37501403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10388610/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Quality of life (QoL) questionnaires are widely used in clinical interviews to assess the impact of medical interventions or measure the outcomes of healthcare services. The main aim of such questionnaires is the subjective assessment of health status and its impact on QoL. This study aimed to develop an efficient, short sinonasal disease assessment instrument, the sinonasal outcomes test-12 (SNOT-12), and to compare it with the preexisting SNOT-22.

METHODS

This was a two-phase cross-sectional study. The study was performed between June 2019 and February 2020 using the electronic files of the ORL department outpatient clinics at King Fahd University Hospital, affiliated with Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University. The study was performed in 2 phases: an item reduction phase, which resulted in an initial SNOT-12 scale, and a validation phase, using a comparative analysis of the initial SNOT-12 and the SNOT-22.

RESULTS

The developed short-form SNOT-12 maintained the 4 latent factors extracted in EFA (nasal, Sleep/extra nasal, psychological, ear/facial). It strongly correlated with SNOT-22 ( = 0.973). It had good construct reliability (0.705-0.901) and validity and a higher discrimination power than the SNOT-22.

CONCLUSIONS

The SNOT-12 is a short, valid, and reliable instrument that may prove useful for the initial screening and monitoring of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

摘要

目的

生活质量(QoL)问卷广泛应用于临床访谈中,以评估医疗干预的效果或衡量医疗保健服务的结果。这类问卷的主要目的是主观评估健康状况及其对生活质量的影响。本研究旨在开发一种高效、简短的鼻-鼻窦疾病评估工具,即鼻-鼻窦结局测试-12 项(SNOT-12),并将其与现有的 SNOT-22 进行比较。

方法

这是一项两阶段的横断面研究。研究于 2019 年 6 月至 2020 年 2 月期间在 Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal 大学附属医院的 King Fahd 大学医院耳鼻喉科门诊的电子病历中进行。研究分为两个阶段:一个是项目删减阶段,由此产生了初始的 SNOT-12 量表;另一个是验证阶段,使用初始的 SNOT-12 和 SNOT-22 的对比分析。

结果

所开发的简短版 SNOT-12 保留了 EFA 中提取的 4 个潜在因素(鼻部、睡眠/额外鼻部、心理、耳/面部)。它与 SNOT-22 高度相关(=0.973)。它具有良好的结构可靠性(0.705-0.901)和有效性,且比 SNOT-22 具有更高的区分能力。

结论

SNOT-12 是一种简短、有效且可靠的工具,可能对慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者的初步筛查和监测有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a0/10388610/054b26eed431/10.1177_21501319231189060-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a0/10388610/2cbb5feaf909/10.1177_21501319231189060-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a0/10388610/054b26eed431/10.1177_21501319231189060-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a0/10388610/2cbb5feaf909/10.1177_21501319231189060-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a0/10388610/054b26eed431/10.1177_21501319231189060-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of the Sinonasal Outcome Test-12.《鼻窦结局测试-12 版的制定与验证》
J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231189060. doi: 10.1177/21501319231189060.
2
Development of Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Domains in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps.慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉患者的鼻-鼻窦结局测试(SNOT-22)领域的开发。
Laryngoscope. 2022 May;132(5):933-941. doi: 10.1002/lary.29766. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
3
Assessment of health-related quality-of-life in patients with chronic Rhinosinusitis - Validation of the German Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (German-SNOT-22).慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者健康相关生活质量评估——德国鼻-鼻窦结局测试 22 项(German-SNOT-22)的验证。
J Psychosom Res. 2021 Jan;140:110316. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110316. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
4
Utility of Visual Analog Scale of Subdomain Scores of the 22-Item Sinonasal Outcome Test in Chronic Rhinosinusitis.22 项鼻鼻窦结局测试子域评分视觉模拟量表在慢性鼻-鼻窦炎中的效用。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Aug;167(2):391-394. doi: 10.1177/01945998211068748. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
5
Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test.22 项鼻-鼻窦结局测试的心理测量效度。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Oct;34(5):447-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01995.x.
6
EVALUATION OF THE UKRAINIAN VERSION OF SNOT-22 QUESTIONNAIRE VALIDITY FOR ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC RHINOSINUSITIS AND NASAL SEPTUM DEVIATION.评估 SNOT-22 问卷在评估慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻中隔偏曲患者生活质量中的乌克兰语版本的有效性。
Georgian Med News. 2020 Nov(308):43-47.
7
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the 22-item sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22) in German-speaking patients: a prospective, multicenter cohort study.跨文化调适与验证 22 项鼻窦结局测试(SNOT-22)于德语族群患者:前瞻性、多中心队列研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 May;279(5):2433-2439. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07019-6. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
8
Psychometric Validation of a Moroccan Version of the 22-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test.22项鼻-鼻窦结局测试摩洛哥语版本的心理测量学验证
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Oct;155(4):681-7. doi: 10.1177/0194599816650477. Epub 2016 May 17.
9
A validated model for the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test subdomain structure in chronic rhinosinusitis.慢性鼻-鼻窦炎 22 项 Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 亚域结构的验证模型。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017 Dec;7(12):1140-1148. doi: 10.1002/alr.22025. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
10
Quality of Life Measurement for Adolescent Patients with Sinonasal Symptoms.青少年鼻-鼻窦症状患者的生活质量测量。
Laryngoscope. 2023 May;133(5):1052-1058. doi: 10.1002/lary.30232. Epub 2022 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Content Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Developed for Assessing Disease-Specific Quality of Life in Children With Sinonasal Disease: A Systematic Review.用于评估鼻鼻窦疾病患儿特定疾病生活质量的患者报告结局指标的内容效度:一项系统评价。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2025 Mar;15(3):317-327. doi: 10.1002/alr.23539. Epub 2025 Feb 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Receiver operating characteristic curve: overview and practical use for clinicians.受试者工作特征曲线:概述与临床医师的实际应用
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022 Feb;75(1):25-36. doi: 10.4097/kja.21209. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
2
Exploring possibilities for shortening the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) using item response theory.运用项目反应理论探索缩短22项鼻鼻窦结局测试(SNOT-22)的可能性。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Feb;12(2):191-199. doi: 10.1002/alr.22878. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
3
European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020.
欧洲鼻窦炎和鼻息肉 2020 年立场文件。
Rhinology. 2020 Feb 20;58(Suppl S29):1-464. doi: 10.4193/Rhin20.600.
4
Determinants of noticeable symptom improvement despite sub-MCID change in SNOT-22 score after treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis.治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎后 SNOT-22 评分虽低于最小临床重要差异但症状明显改善的决定因素。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019 May;9(5):508-513. doi: 10.1002/alr.22269. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
5
Psychometric Arabic Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22: validation and translation in chronic rhinosinusitis patients.阿拉伯语鼻鼻窦结局测试-22心理测量学:慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者中的验证与翻译
Ann Saudi Med. 2018 Jan-Feb;38(1):22-27. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2018.22.
6
The link between chronic rhinosinusitis and asthma: A questionnaire-based study.慢性鼻窦炎与哮喘之间的关联:一项基于问卷调查的研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(31):e4294. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004294.
7
Stratification of SNOT-22 scores into mild, moderate or severe and relationship with other subjective instruments.将SNOT-22评分分层为轻度、中度或重度及其与其他主观评估工具的关系。
Rhinology. 2016 Jun;54(2):129-33. doi: 10.4193/Rhino15.072.
8
SNOT-22 quality of life domains differentially predict treatment modality selection in chronic rhinosinusitis.SNOT-22生活质量领域对慢性鼻窦炎治疗方式的选择具有不同的预测作用。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014 Dec;4(12):972-9. doi: 10.1002/alr.21408. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
9
Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test.22 项鼻-鼻窦结局测试的心理测量效度。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Oct;34(5):447-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01995.x.
10
Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models.用于评估诊断试验和预测模型的受试者工作特征分析。
Circulation. 2007 Feb 6;115(5):654-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.594929.