Bashir Riyaz, Noory Ali, Oliveros Estefania, Romero Carlos, Maruthi Rohit, Mirza Arslan, Lakhter Vladimir, Zhao Huaqing, Brisco-Bacik Meredith, Vaidya Anjali, Auger William R, Forfia Paul
Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Cardiovascular Institute at Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburg, PA.
JACC Adv. 2023 May;2(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100291. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of refined balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) in the treatment of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).
BPA is rapidly evolving therapeutic option for patients with nonsurgical CTEPH. There are few US studies that have reported on the outcomes of this novel therapeutic option.
This is a retrospective study of CTEPH patients that underwent BPA at Temple University Hospital. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) after BPA as compared to baseline and the primary safety endpoint was the rate of hemoptysis within 24 hours. Secondary endpoints included death, WHO functional class, and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD). We used logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with a hemodynamic and functional response.
otal of 211 BPA sessions were performed on 77 patients (average 2.7 ± 1.7 sessions/patient). After BPA the mean PVR improved by 26% (P<0.001) while the mean 6MWD improved by 71.7 meters (P <0.001) and WHO functional class improved by one functional class (P <0.001). Ten sessions (4.7%) were complicated by hemoptysis. The independent factors associated with a improved functional and hemodynamic response included the pre-procedural use of riociguat, reduce baseline PA compliance and > 3 BPA sessions per patient.
This single center study from the US showed that BPA with refined techniques in patients with CTEPH was safe and was associated with significant improvements in pulmonary hemodynamics and functional capacity.
我们旨在评估改良球囊肺动脉血管成形术(BPA)治疗慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)患者的疗效和安全性。
BPA是一种快速发展的非手术CTEPH患者治疗选择。美国很少有研究报道这种新治疗选择的结果。
这是一项对在天普大学医院接受BPA治疗的CTEPH患者的回顾性研究。主要疗效终点是BPA后与基线相比肺血管阻力(PVR)的变化,主要安全终点是24小时内咯血发生率。次要终点包括死亡、世界卫生组织功能分级和6分钟步行距离(6MWD)。我们使用逻辑回归评估与血流动力学和功能反应相关的因素。
共对77例患者进行了211次BPA治疗(平均每位患者2.7±1.7次治疗)。BPA后平均PVR改善了26%(P<0.001),而平均6MWD增加了71.7米(P<0.001),世界卫生组织功能分级改善了一个功能级别(P<0.001)。10次治疗(4.7%)出现咯血并发症。与功能和血流动力学反应改善相关的独立因素包括术前使用利奥西呱、降低基线肺动脉顺应性以及每位患者接受>3次BPA治疗。
这项来自美国的单中心研究表明,采用改良技术的BPA治疗CTEPH患者是安全的,并且与肺血流动力学和功能能力的显著改善相关。