Orito Kimihiko, Kajiwara Sosyo, Takeuchi Yasuharu, Sakata Kiyohiko, Abe Toshi, Tanoue Shuichi, Uchiyama Yusuke, Hirohata Masaru, Morioka Motohiro
Department of Neurosurgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
Department of Radiology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2022;16(11):535-541. doi: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2021-0106. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
The mechanism of transient cortical blindness after endovascular treatment-a rare phenomenon-has not been elucidated; however, it is assumed to be related to contrast medium leakage (CML). We investigated the relationship between postoperative CML and cortical blindness in patients who underwent endovascular treatment for vascular lesions of posterior circulation.
This retrospective cohort study included 28 patients who underwent endovascular treatment for posterior circulation aneurysms at our hospital between January 2014 and December 2018. Cerebral CT was performed immediately after endovascular treatment and 24 h later. CT images were retrospectively evaluated with special interest in the presence and distribution of leakage of the contrast medium (CM). Patients were classified into the following three groups based on CT findings: Group A, no CML (11 patients); Group B, unilateral CML (5 patients); and Group C, bilateral CML (9 patients).
The posterior circulation aneurysms were located in the basilar artery in 13 (52.0%) cases, in the posterior cerebral artery in 1 (4.0%) case, and in the vertebral artery in 11 (44.0%) cases. There was no difference regarding the adjunctive technique used for endovascular treatment between the groups. Patients in Group C used a significantly larger amount of CM than those in the other two groups. A longer operation time was associated with a larger amount of CM used during treatment. VerifyNow assay revealed that the P2Y12 reaction unit was significantly lower in Groups B and C. Cortical blindness was transiently observed in 2 of 9 patients (22.2%) in Group C, both of which showed CML surrounding the bilateral parieto-occipital sulcus.
Both patients with cortical blindness showed bilateral CML, both of which showed CML surrounding the bilateral parieto-occipital sulcus. The CM-induced blood-brain barrier disruption may be the cause of cortical blindness.
血管内治疗后短暂性皮质盲这一罕见现象的机制尚未阐明;然而,推测其与造影剂渗漏(CML)有关。我们研究了后循环血管病变接受血管内治疗的患者术后CML与皮质盲之间的关系。
这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2014年1月至2018年12月在我院接受后循环动脉瘤血管内治疗的28例患者。血管内治疗后立即及24小时后进行脑部CT检查。对CT图像进行回顾性评估,特别关注造影剂(CM)渗漏的存在及分布情况。根据CT检查结果将患者分为以下三组:A组,无CML(11例患者);B组,单侧CML(5例患者);C组,双侧CML(9例患者)。
后循环动脉瘤位于基底动脉13例(52.0%),大脑后动脉1例(4.0%),椎动脉11例(44.0%)。各组间血管内治疗所采用的辅助技术无差异。C组患者使用的CM量显著多于其他两组。手术时间越长,治疗期间使用的CM量越大。VerifyNow检测显示,B组和C组的P2Y12反应单位显著降低。C组9例患者中有2例(22.2%)短暂出现皮质盲,均显示双侧顶枕沟周围有CML。
出现皮质盲的两名患者均表现为双侧CML,均显示双侧顶枕沟周围有CML。CM诱导的血脑屏障破坏可能是皮质盲的原因。