Asai Takumi, Ikezawa Mizuka, Oyama Takahiro, Ito Syohei, Kimata Masayuki, Hoshinaga Toshiaki, Ohta Shinji, Ohno Masasuke, Susaki Noriyuki, Kajita Yasukazu, Takahashi Tatsuo
Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2021;15(5):323-331. doi: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2020-0029. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
The effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) is controversial in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of MT in octogenarians.
One hundred and sixty-five patients who underwent MT for anterior circulation LVO between May 2014 and August 2019 at our institution were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups, the elderly group (≥80 years) and non-elderly group (<80 years), and we compared the effective recanalization rate (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b-3), good outcome rate (modified Rankin Scale 0-2 at 90 days), time from groin puncture to recanalization (P to R), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality rate between them retrospectively. Eligible patients for MT were judged using the Japanese stroke guidelines, and the selection criteria were more carefully applied to elderly patients.
MT was performed on 48 elderly patients (29.1%) and 117 non-elderly patients (70.9%). On the other hand, 10 elderly patients (19.6%) and 5 non-elderly patients (5.4%) did not undergo MT even though they met the inclusion criteria. There were significantly fewer male patients and smokers in the elderly group, but other baseline and clinical characteristics were not significantly different between the groups. Effective recanalization (elderly 93.8% vs non-elderly 91.5%), good outcome (45.8% vs 60.7%), P to R (33.5 minutes vs 33.5 minutes), sICH (2.1% vs 4.3%), and mortality (8.3% vs 2.6%) were not significantly different between the two groups.
When recanalization was achieved by strict preoperative evaluation of clinical conditions and imaging, MT may be safe and effective even for octogenarians or older patients.
机械取栓术(MT)治疗老年患者前循环大血管闭塞(LVO)的有效性存在争议。本研究旨在评估MT在八旬老人中的疗效。
对2014年5月至2019年8月在我院接受MT治疗前循环LVO的165例患者进行评估。患者分为两组,老年组(≥80岁)和非老年组(<80岁),我们回顾性比较了两组的有效再通率(脑梗死溶栓2b-3级)、良好预后率(90天时改良Rankin量表0-2级)、从股动脉穿刺到再通的时间(P至R)、症状性颅内出血(sICH)和死亡率。使用日本卒中指南判断符合MT治疗条件的患者,对老年患者更严格地应用选择标准。
48例老年患者(29.1%)和117例非老年患者(70.9%)接受了MT治疗。另一方面,10例老年患者(19.6%)和5例非老年患者(5.4%)尽管符合纳入标准但未接受MT治疗。老年组男性患者和吸烟者明显较少,但两组之间的其他基线和临床特征无显著差异。两组之间的有效再通率(老年组93.8% vs非老年组91.5%)、良好预后率(45.8% vs 60.7%)、P至R时间(33.5分钟vs 33.5分钟)、sICH(2.1% vs 4.3%)和死亡率(8.3% vs 2.6%)无显著差异。
通过严格的术前临床状况评估和影像学检查实现再通时,MT即使对于八旬老人或更年长的患者可能也是安全有效的。