Deodhar Aditi V, Bertenthal Bennett I
HANDS in Autism® Interdisciplinary Training and Resource Center, Riley Hospital for Children at IU Health, Department of Psychiatry, IU School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University-Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 12;14:1146101. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1146101. eCollection 2023.
Executive Function consists of self-regulation processes which underlie our ability to plan, coordinate, and complete goal-directed actions in our daily lives. While attention is widely considered to be central to the emergence and development of executive function during early childhood, it is not clear if it is integral or separable from other executive function processes. Previous studies have not addressed this question satisfactorily because executive function and attention are multidimensional constructs, but they are often studied without differentiating the specific processes that are tested. Moreover, some studies consist of only one task per process, making it difficult to ascertain if the pattern of results is attributable to different processes or more simply to task variance. The main aim of this study was to more fully investigate how attention factored into the underlying structure of executive function in preschool children. Preschool children ( = 137) completed a battery of tasks which included executive function (i.e., response inhibition, working memory) and attentional control (i.e., sustained attention, selective attention) processes; there were two tasks per process. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were conducted to test which of three models fit the data best: (1) a unitary one-factor model with attention loading onto the same factor as other executive function processes, (2) a two-factor model with attention loading onto a separate factor than other executive function processes, or (3) a three-factor model with attention, response inhibition, and working memory as separate factors. Fit indices and model comparisons indicated that the two-factor model fit the data best, suggesting that attentional control and executive function were related, but separable. Although this study is not the first to advocate for a two-factor model during the preschool years, it is the first to suggest that the two factors are attentional control and executive function, not working memory and response inhibition. One important implication of these findings is that a complete assessment of executive function during the preschool years necessitates measuring not only response inhibition and working memory, but attentional control as well.
执行功能由自我调节过程组成,这些过程是我们在日常生活中计划、协调和完成目标导向行动能力的基础。虽然注意力被广泛认为是幼儿期执行功能出现和发展的核心,但尚不清楚它是否与其他执行功能过程整合在一起或可分离。先前的研究未能令人满意地解决这个问题,因为执行功能和注意力是多维结构,但在研究时往往没有区分所测试的具体过程。此外,一些研究每个过程仅包含一项任务,这使得难以确定结果模式是归因于不同的过程,还是更简单地归因于任务差异。本研究的主要目的是更全面地研究注意力如何融入学龄前儿童执行功能的潜在结构。137名学龄前儿童完成了一系列任务,包括执行功能(即反应抑制、工作记忆)和注意力控制(即持续注意力、选择性注意力)过程;每个过程有两项任务。进行了验证性因素分析(CFA)以测试三种模型中哪一种最适合数据:(1)单一的单因素模型,注意力与其他执行功能过程加载到同一因素上;(2)双因素模型,注意力加载到与其他执行功能过程不同的因素上;或(3)三因素模型,注意力、反应抑制和工作记忆作为单独的因素。拟合指数和模型比较表明,双因素模型最适合数据,这表明注意力控制和执行功能相关,但可分离。虽然这项研究不是第一个主张学龄前儿童采用双因素模型的研究,但它是第一个表明这两个因素是注意力控制和执行功能,而不是工作记忆和反应抑制的研究。这些发现的一个重要意义是,在学龄前儿童中对执行功能进行全面评估不仅需要测量反应抑制和工作记忆,还需要测量注意力控制。