Dupéré Véronique, Goulet Mélissa, Archambault Isabelle, Dion Eric, Leventhal Tama, Crosnoe Robert
École de psychoéducation, Université de Montréal, Institut de recherche en santé publique de l'Université de Montréal (IRSPUM), and Centre jeunesse de Montréal - Institut Universitaire (CJM-IU).
École de psychoéducation, Université de Montréal.
J Res Rural Educ. 2019;35(3):1-20. doi: 10.26209/jrre3503.
This study examined whether recent disruptive events would increase the likelihood of high school dropout among both rural and urban youths, and whether the types of disruptive events preceding dropout would be different in rural vs. urban environments. Based on interviews conducted with early school leavers and matched at-risk schoolmates (N = 366) in 12 disadvantaged Canadian high schools, recent disruptive events appeared to generally trigger dropout. However, the prevalence of some types of events associated with dropout varies according to the environment. In agreement with social disorganization and formal/informal social control models, crises involving child welfare services or the juvenile justice system (e.g., an arrest after a fight) represented a lower share of triggering events among rural than urban leavers (8% vs. 26%, respectively), whereas those involving peer conflicts and rejection (e.g., exclusion from one's peer group) were overrepresented among rural compared to urban leavers (26% vs. 10%, respectively). These differences are thought to represent upsides and downsides associated with the relative density, stability, and overlapping nature of rural adolescents' social networks. Practical implications are discussed, notably regarding the relevance and contextual adaptation of prevention programs as a function of place.
本研究考察了近期的干扰性事件是否会增加农村和城市青少年辍学的可能性,以及辍学前干扰性事件的类型在农村和城市环境中是否会有所不同。基于对加拿大12所处境不利的高中的早期离校生和匹配的高危同学(N = 366)进行的访谈,近期的干扰性事件似乎通常会引发辍学。然而,与辍学相关的某些类型事件的发生率会因环境而异。与社会失序以及正式/非正式社会控制模型一致,涉及儿童福利服务或青少年司法系统的危机(例如打架后被捕)在农村离校生中引发事件的比例低于城市离校生(分别为8%和26%),而涉及同伴冲突和排斥(例如被同伴群体排斥)的事件在农村离校生中的占比高于城市离校生(分别为26%和10%)。这些差异被认为代表了农村青少年社会网络的相对密度、稳定性和重叠性质所带来的利弊。文中讨论了实际意义,特别是关于预防项目根据地点的相关性和情境适应性。