Mancone Stefania, Diotaiuti Pierluigi, Valente Giuseppe, Corrado Stefano, Bellizzi Fernando, Vilarino Guilherme Torres, Andrade Alexandro
Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy.
Health and Sports Science Center, Department of Physical Education, Santa Catarina State University, Florianópolis 88035-901, Brazil.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jul 2;13(7):550. doi: 10.3390/bs13070550.
This study aimed to use the Alexa vocal assistant as an administerer of psychometric tests, assessing the efficiency and validity of this measurement. A total of 300 participants were administered the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). After a week, the administration was repeated, but the participants were randomly divided into groups of 100 participants each. In the first, the test was administered by means of a paper version; in the second, the questionnaire was read to the participants in person, and the operator contemporaneously recorded the answers declared by the participants; in the third group, the questionnaire was directly administered by the Alexa voice device, after specific reprogramming. The third group was also administered, as a post-session survey, the Engagement and Perceptions of the Bot Scale (EPVS), a short version of the Communication Styles Inventory (CSI), the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (MCSDS), and an additional six items to measure degrees of concentration, ease, and perceived pressure at the beginning and at the end of the administration. The results confirmed that the IRI did keep measurement invariance within the three conditions. The administration through vocal assistant showed an empathic activation effect significantly superior to the conditions of pencil-paper and operator-in-presence. The results indicated an engagement and positive evaluation of the interactive experience, with reported perceptions of closeness, warmth, competence, and human-likeness associated with higher values of empathetic activation and lower values of personal discomfort.
本研究旨在将Alexa语音助手用作心理测量测试的施测工具,评估这种测量方式的效率和有效性。共有300名参与者接受了人际反应指数(IRI)测试。一周后,再次进行测试,但参与者被随机分成每组100人的三组。第一组通过纸质版进行测试;第二组由操作人员亲自向参与者宣读问卷,同时记录参与者给出的答案;第三组在经过特定重新编程后,由Alexa语音设备直接进行问卷施测。作为会话后调查,第三组还接受了机器人参与度和感知量表(EPVS)、沟通风格量表简版(CSI)、马洛-克劳恩社会赞许性量表(MCSDS)的测试,以及另外六项用于测量施测开始和结束时的专注程度、轻松程度和感知压力的项目。结果证实,IRI在三种条件下确实保持了测量不变性。通过语音助手进行施测显示出的共情激活效应显著优于纸笔测试和有操作人员在场的条件。结果表明参与者对互动体验有参与感且评价积极,报告称与更高的共情激活值和更低的个人不适感相关的亲密感、温暖感、能力感和类人感。