Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69, Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.
Curr Oncol. 2023 Jun 21;30(7):5984-5994. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30070447.
Malignant dysphagia is a common problem in patients with esophageal cancer. Endoscopic stenting can resolve dysphagia caused by malignant stricture; however, controversy exists regarding the use of esophageal stenting for the treatment of malignant stricture, including whether stenting or radiotherapy is superior, whether stenting before or after radiotherapy is safe, whether stenting before or after chemotherapy is safe, and whether low-radial-force stents are safer than conventional stents. Among treatment options for malignant dysphagia, stenting may have some disadvantages in terms of pain relief and the risk of adverse events compared with radiotherapy and in terms of survival compared with gastrostomy. Additionally, the risk of stent-related adverse events is significantly associated with prior radiotherapy. The risk of perforation is especially high when a radiation dose of >40 Gy is delivered to the esophagus after stenting, whereas perforation is not associated with prior chemotherapy or additional chemotherapy after stenting. Nevertheless, stenting remains an important palliative option, especially for patients with a short life expectancy and a strong desire for oral intake, because stenting can facilitate a more rapid improvement in dysphagia than radiotherapy or gastrostomy. The application of a low-radial-force stent should be considered to reduce the risk of adverse events, especially in patients with prior radiotherapy.
恶性吞咽困难是食管癌患者常见的问题。内镜下支架置入术可缓解恶性狭窄引起的吞咽困难;然而,对于恶性狭窄的治疗,包括支架置入术与放疗的优劣、放疗前还是放疗后支架置入的安全性、化疗前还是化疗后支架置入的安全性、低径向力支架是否比传统支架更安全等方面,仍存在争议。在恶性吞咽困难的治疗选择中,支架置入术在缓解疼痛和不良事件风险方面可能劣于放疗,在生存方面劣于胃造口术。此外,支架相关不良事件的风险与先前的放疗显著相关。在支架置入后,食管接受>40Gy 的放射剂量时,穿孔的风险尤其高,而穿孔与先前的化疗或支架置入后的额外化疗无关。然而,支架置入仍然是一种重要的姑息治疗选择,特别是对于预期寿命短且强烈希望口服摄入的患者,因为支架置入可以比放疗或胃造口术更迅速地改善吞咽困难。应考虑应用低径向力支架以降低不良事件的风险,尤其是在有先前放疗史的患者中。