Truhan Tayler E, Sedikides Constantine, Armour Cherie, Papageorgiou Kostas A
Department of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Department of Psychology, Center for Research on Self and Identity, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
J Adolesc. 2023 Oct;95(7):1505-1519. doi: 10.1002/jad.12223. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
Adolescent personality is consistently linked to behavioral strengths and difficulties. However, most of this work is limited in that it does not consider personality beyond the Big Five or economic or parental adversity contexts. The Tri-Directional Framework of Parent and Offspring Traits and Outcomes highlights the collective influence of personality, parenting, and context on offspring behavioral outcomes.
Parent and adolescent cross-sectional data were collected from 2019 to 2021 as part of the Parents and Children Together project in the United Kingdom. Adolescents (N = 310, 48.7% female) self-reported on Dark Triad traits, parenting, and behavior. Parents (N = 288, 46.9% mothers) self-reported on socioeconomic status and adverse childhood experiences. In two path analysis models, we examined: (1) adolescent Dark Triad, context, and their interactions as predictors of perceived maternal and paternal warmth, hostility, and control; and (2) adolescent Dark Triad, perceived parenting, context, and personality-parenting interactions as predictors of adolescent behavioral strengths and difficulties.
Adolescent narcissistic traits were the strongest predictors of perceived maternal parenting, whereas adolescent psychopathy and Machiavellianism were the strongest predictors of perceived paternal parenting. Adolescent personality interacted with contextual factors in predicting parenting, but not with perceived parenting in predicting behavior.
Adolescent Dark Triad traits, especially narcissism, and contextual factors are important for the parent-offspring relationship and developmental outcomes. We recommend that research move beyond assessing direct trait-outcome associations to examining how these associations operate in different environments.
青少年的个性一直与行为优势和困难相关联。然而,这项工作大多存在局限性,因为它没有考虑到“大五”人格之外的个性、经济或父母逆境背景。亲子特质与结果的三向框架强调了个性、养育方式和背景对子女行为结果的共同影响。
作为英国“父母与子女在一起”项目的一部分,于2019年至2021年收集了父母与青少年的横断面数据。青少年(N = 310,48.7%为女性)自我报告了黑暗三性格特质、养育方式和行为。父母(N = 288,46.9%为母亲)自我报告了社会经济地位和童年不良经历。在两个路径分析模型中,我们研究了:(1)青少年黑暗三性格、背景及其相互作用作为感知到的母亲和父亲的温暖、敌意和控制的预测因素;(2)青少年黑暗三性格、感知到的养育方式、背景以及个性与养育方式的相互作用作为青少年行为优势和困难的预测因素。
青少年自恋特质是感知到的母亲养育方式的最强预测因素,而青少年精神病态和马基雅维利主义是感知到的父亲养育方式的最强预测因素。青少年个性在预测养育方式时与背景因素相互作用,但在预测行为时与感知到的养育方式没有相互作用。
青少年黑暗三性格特质,尤其是自恋,以及背景因素对亲子关系和发展结果很重要。我们建议研究超越评估直接的特质与结果关联,转而研究这些关联在不同环境中是如何运作的。