Belkina Elena G, Seleznev Dmitry G, Sorokina Svetlana Yu, Kulikov Alex M, Lazebny Oleg E
Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology, The Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters, The Russian Academy of Sciences, 152742 Rybinsk, Russia.
Insects. 2023 Jul 5;14(7):609. doi: 10.3390/insects14070609.
Prezygotic isolation mechanisms, particularly courtship behavior, play a significant role in the formation of reproductive barriers. The action of these mechanisms leads to the coexistence of numerous closely related insect species with specific adaptations in a shared or adjacent territory. The genetic basis of these mechanisms has been studied using closely related Drosophila species, such as the group. However, the investigation of individual courtship behavior elements has been limited until recently, and the effect of genotype on the species-specific features of courtship as a whole has not been thoroughly examined. It should be noted that courtship behavior is not a typical quantitative trait that can be easily measured or quantified in both females and males, similar to traits like wing length or bristle number. Each courtship element involves the participation of both female and male partners, making the genetic analysis of this behavior complex. As a result, the traditional approach of genetic analysis for quantitative traits, which involves variance decomposition in a set of crosses, including parental species, F1 and F2 hybrids, and backcrosses of F1 to parental species, is not suitable for analyzing courtship behavior. To address this, we employed a modified design by introducing what we refer to as 'reference partners' during the testing of hybrid individuals from F1, F2, and backcrosses. These reference partners represented one of the parental species. This approach allowed us to categorize all possible test combinations into four groups based on the reference partner's sex (female or male) and their constant genotype towards one of the parental species ( or ). The genotype of the second partner in the within-group test combinations varied from completely conspecific to completely heterospecific, based on the parental chromosomal sets. To assess the contribution of partner genotypes to the variability of courtship-element parameters, we employed structural equation modeling (SEM) instead of the traditional analysis of variance (ANOVA). SEM enabled us to estimate the regression of the proportion of chromosomes of a specific species type on the value of each courtship-element parameter in partners with varying genotypes across different test combinations. The aim of the current study was to analyze the involvement of sex chromosomes and autosomes in the formation of courtship structure in and . The genetic analysis was complemented by video recording and formalization of courtship-ritual elements. was found to be more sensitive to mate stimuli compared to . The majority of species-specific parameters, such as latency and duration of courtship elements (e.g., male and female song, following, licking, and circling), were shown to be influenced by the genotype. However, not all of these parameters significantly impact copulation success, with the male song, licking, and following being the most significant. In females, the female song was found to have a significant relationship only with copulation duration. The influence of the female genotype on the species-specific parameters of courtship elements is primarily related to autosomes, while the male genotype is associated with the X chromosomes. The study suggests that sexual selection primarily occurs through acoustic and chemoreceptor channels.
合子前隔离机制,尤其是求偶行为,在生殖隔离的形成中起着重要作用。这些机制的作用导致众多密切相关的昆虫物种在共享或相邻区域中凭借特定适应性共存。已经利用密切相关的果蝇物种,如该类群,对这些机制的遗传基础进行了研究。然而,直到最近,对单个求偶行为要素的研究仍然有限,而且基因型对整体求偶物种特异性特征的影响尚未得到充分研究。应当指出的是,求偶行为并非像翅长或刚毛数量等性状那样,是一种在雌性和雄性中都能轻松测量或量化的典型数量性状。每个求偶要素都涉及雌雄双方的参与,这使得对这种行为的遗传分析变得复杂。因此,用于数量性状遗传分析的传统方法,即通过包括亲本物种、F1和F2杂种以及F1与亲本物种回交在内的一组杂交中的方差分解,并不适用于分析求偶行为。为了解决这个问题,我们采用了一种改进的设计,即在对F1、F2和回交杂种个体进行测试时引入我们所谓的“参考伴侣”。这些参考伴侣代表亲本物种之一。这种方法使我们能够根据参考伴侣的性别(雌性或雄性)及其对亲本物种之一(或)的固定基因型,将所有可能的测试组合分为四组。组内测试组合中第二个伴侣的基因型根据亲本染色体组从完全同种到完全异种而有所不同。为了评估伴侣基因型对求偶要素参数变异性的贡献,我们采用了结构方程模型(SEM)而非传统的方差分析(ANOVA)。SEM使我们能够估计在不同测试组合中具有不同基因型的伴侣中,特定物种类型染色体比例对每个求偶要素参数值的回归。当前研究的目的是分析性染色体和常染色体在[具体物种1]和[具体物种2]求偶结构形成中的参与情况。遗传分析通过求偶仪式要素的视频记录和形式化得到补充。发现[具体物种1]与[具体物种2]相比对配偶刺激更为敏感。大多数物种特异性参数,如求偶要素的潜伏期和持续时间(例如雄性和雌性鸣叫、跟随、舔舐和环绕),都显示受[具体物种1]基因型的影响。然而,并非所有这些参数都对交配成功有显著影响,其中雄性鸣叫、舔舐和跟随最为显著。在雌性中,发现雌性鸣叫仅与交配持续时间有显著关系。雌性基因型对求偶要素物种特异性参数的影响主要与常染色体有关,而雄性基因型与X染色体有关。该研究表明,性选择主要通过声学和化学感受器通道发生。