Suppr超能文献

开花香菜()条带不会增强亚速尔群岛果园的生态系统服务功能。 (注:括号内“()”处原文似乎信息不完整)

Flowering Coriander () Strips Do Not Enhance Ecosystem Services in Azorean Orchards.

作者信息

Ferrante Marco, Lövei Gabor L, Lavigne Lambert, Vicente Mario Caballero, Tarantino Elisa, Lopes David Horta, Monjardino Paulo, Borges Paulo A V

机构信息

cE3c-Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Azorean Biodiversity Group, CHANGE-Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Environment, University of the Azores, PT-9700-042 Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal.

Functional Agrobiodiversity, Department of Crop Science, Georg-August University of Gottingen, DE-37077 Gottingen, Germany.

出版信息

Insects. 2023 Jul 14;14(7):634. doi: 10.3390/insects14070634.

Abstract

The effect of flower strips on ecosystem services (ESs) and disservices (EDs) is routinely assessed following changes in service provider densities without measuring the associated levels of ES/EDs. By using the sentinel approach (i.e., exposing a plant, seeds, and prey models in a standardized way), we tested how coriander () strips planted in mixed orchards on Terceira Island (Azores, Portugal) affected herbivory on lettuce plants, seed predation on wheat and weed seeds, and predation on artificial caterpillars. Vertebrates had more influence than invertebrates on ESs/EDs. Herbivory (ED) after 2 weeks was similar in the coriander and the control plots (mean ± SD; 2.3% ± 3.3% vs. 2.2% ± 2.9%, n = 32 for both). Seed predation was higher in the control than in the coriander plots for both grain (ED; 30.8% ± 38.9% vs. 15.3% ± 10.8%, n = 18 for both) and weed seeds (ES; 2.5% ± 4.1% vs. 0.4% ± 0.5%, n = 18 for both). Vertebrate predation (ES) rates after 48 h were significantly higher in the control (estimate 9%, 95% CI: 4-20%) than in the coriander plots (3%, 1-8%), while no difference was observed for invertebrate predation. Coriander strips did not support increased ES/reduced ED levels in this setting. The tools used can be effective to quantitatively compare multiple ESs/EDs under different farming management strategies.

摘要

在未测量相关生态系统服务/负效应水平的情况下,通常会根据服务提供者密度的变化来评估花卉带对生态系统服务(ESs)和负效应(EDs)的影响。通过使用定点监测方法(即以标准化方式暴露植物、种子和猎物模型),我们测试了在亚速尔群岛特塞拉岛的混合果园中种植的香菜带如何影响生菜植株上的食草动物行为、小麦和杂草种子的种子捕食以及对人工毛虫的捕食。脊椎动物对生态系统服务/负效应的影响比无脊椎动物更大。两周后的食草动物行为(负效应)在香菜带和对照地块中相似(平均值±标准差;2.3%±3.3%对2.2%±2.9%,两者n = 32)。对于谷物(负效应)和杂草种子(生态系统服务),对照地块中的种子捕食率均高于香菜带地块(谷物:30.8%±38.9%对15.3%±10.8%,两者n = 18;杂草种子:2.5%±4.1%对0.4%±0.5%,两者n = 18)。48小时后的脊椎动物捕食(生态系统服务)率在对照地块中显著高于香菜带地块(估计值9%,95%置信区间:4 - 20%),而无脊椎动物捕食方面未观察到差异。在这种情况下,香菜带并未支持生态系统服务增加/负效应降低。所使用的工具对于定量比较不同农业管理策略下的多种生态系统服务/负效应可能是有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca48/10380325/7c2e2d021485/insects-14-00634-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验