• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

言论自由还是自由仇恨?:Gab 社交平台上的 LGBTQ+ 肯定空间中的反 LGBTQ+言论。

Free Speech or Free to Hate?: Anti-LGBTQ+ Discourses in LGBTQ+-Affirming Spaces on Gab Social.

机构信息

Department of Communication Studies, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA.

School of Information Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.

出版信息

J Homosex. 2024 Jul 2;71(8):2030-2055. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2023.2218959. Epub 2023 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1080/00918369.2023.2218959
PMID:37505504
Abstract

This article presents a critical discourse analysis of groups on the free speech social media platform Gab that were intended to be LGBTQ+-friendly but became spaces of queerphobia. Results indicate that Gab users deployed discourses of difference to situate the platform as heteronormative and to denigrate the LGBTQ+ community. In particular, discourses utilized in the name of free speech were used to establish LGBTQ+ individuals as abominations, undergird hegemonic masculinity, and marginalize queer folk by reducing them to sex acts and sex organs. This study provides a better understanding of the (in)efficacy of "free speech" as a content moderation policy and unpacks how anti-LGBTQ+ hate speech spreads in digital spaces.

摘要

这篇文章对自由言论社交媒体平台 Gab 上旨在对 LGBTQ+友好但却变成恐同空间的群体进行了批判性话语分析。结果表明,Gab 用户利用差异话语将该平台定位为异性恋规范,并诋毁 LGBTQ+群体。特别是,以言论自由的名义使用的话语将 LGBTQ+个体视为可憎之人,巩固了霸权男性气质,并通过将他们简化为性行为和性器官来边缘化酷儿群体。本研究更好地理解了“言论自由”作为内容审核政策的(不)有效性,并揭示了反 LGBTQ+仇恨言论如何在数字空间中传播。

相似文献

1
Free Speech or Free to Hate?: Anti-LGBTQ+ Discourses in LGBTQ+-Affirming Spaces on Gab Social.言论自由还是自由仇恨?:Gab 社交平台上的 LGBTQ+ 肯定空间中的反 LGBTQ+言论。
J Homosex. 2024 Jul 2;71(8):2030-2055. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2023.2218959. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
2
On the rise of fear speech in online social media.社交媒体中恐惧言论的兴起。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Mar 14;120(11):e2212270120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2212270120. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
3
Towards a Situated Understanding of Vulnerability - An Analysis of Ugandan LGBT+ Exposure to Hate Crimes in Digital Spaces.迈向对脆弱性的情境理解——对乌干达 LGBT+在数字空间中遭遇仇恨犯罪的分析。
J Homosex. 2023 Oct 15;70(12):2806-2827. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2022.2077679. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
4
"A Whole Bunch of Love the Sinner Hate the Sin": LGBTQ Microaggressions Experienced in Religious and Spiritual Context.“爱罪人,恨罪恶”:在宗教和精神背景下经历的LGBTQ微侵犯行为
J Homosex. 2019;66(10):1495-1511. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2018.1542204. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
5
Social Media Use and Health and Well-being of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Youth: Systematic Review.社交媒体使用与女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿青年的健康和幸福感:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 21;24(9):e38449. doi: 10.2196/38449.
6
Content Moderation on Social Media: Does It Matter Who and Why Moderates Hate Speech?社交媒体上的内容审核:谁来审核、为何审核仇恨言论很重要吗?
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2023 Jul;26(7):527-534. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2022.0158. Epub 2023 May 3.
7
Queer space and alternate queer geographies: LBQ women and the search for sexual partners at two LGBTQ-friendly U.S. universities.酷儿空间与另类酷儿地理学:在两所美国 LGBTQ 友好型大学,女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者(LBQ)寻找性伴侣。
J Lesbian Stud. 2020;24(3):227-239. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2019.1676580. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
8
LGBTQ Incorporated: YouTube and the Management of Diversity.LGBTQ 纳入公司:YouTube 与多样性管理。
J Homosex. 2023 Jul 29;70(9):1807-1828. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2022.2042664. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
9
Hegemony and Heteronormativity: Homonormative Discourses of LGBTQ Activists About Lesbian and Gay Parenting.霸权与异性恋规范:LGBTQ 活动家关于女同性恋和男同性恋育儿的同性规范话语
J Homosex. 2019;66(8):1058-1081. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2018.1493252. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
10
Tumbling Into Queer Utopias and Vortexes: Experiences of LGBTQ Social Media Users on Tumblr.翻滚进入酷儿乌托邦和漩涡:Tumblr 上 LGBTQ 社交媒体用户的体验。
J Homosex. 2019;66(12):1715-1735. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2018.1511131. Epub 2018 Sep 20.