• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反应性精神病:分类概念与描述性类别之间的差异。

Reactive Psychosis: Discrepancy Between Nosological Concepts and Descriptive Categories.

机构信息

School of Child Neuropsychiatry, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Department of Psychiatry and Robinson College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 2023 Aug 1;211(8):627-633. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001677.

DOI:10.1097/NMD.0000000000001677
PMID:37505895
Abstract

Reactive psychosis (RP) is a trauma-induced category whose meaning has varied in relation to the role attributed to lived experiences or vulnerable personality. It has long been described in different countries, but seldom investigated under the influence of symptom-based psychiatric classifications. This article aims to examine the development of RP since the early 20th century, outline how it has been incorporated in modern diagnostic classifications, and set out empirical findings. It is likely that variations in terminology and diagnostic practice have affected estimates of the frequency and hampered the validity of RP in earlier studies. To enhance reliability, RP underwent several changes in successive Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and ICD versions and was eventually replaced with descriptive categories for short-lived psychotic disorders. Clinical observations during the COVID-19 pandemic attest the durability of RP, but the current categories prove unhelpful in identifying it and have failed to encourage research.

摘要

反应性精神病(RP)是一种创伤引起的类别,其意义因赋予生活经历或脆弱人格的作用而有所不同。它在不同的国家已经被描述了很长时间,但很少在基于症状的精神病分类的影响下进行调查。本文旨在探讨自 20 世纪初以来 RP 的发展,概述它如何被纳入现代诊断分类,并列出实证发现。术语和诊断实践的差异可能影响了对频率的估计,并阻碍了早期研究中 RP 的有效性。为了提高可靠性,RP 在随后的《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》和《国际疾病分类》版本中经历了多次变化,最终被用于短暂性精神病障碍的描述性类别所取代。在 COVID-19 大流行期间的临床观察证明了 RP 的持久性,但目前的分类在识别它方面没有帮助,也未能鼓励研究。

相似文献

1
Reactive Psychosis: Discrepancy Between Nosological Concepts and Descriptive Categories.反应性精神病:分类概念与描述性类别之间的差异。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2023 Aug 1;211(8):627-633. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001677.
2
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
3
Assessing the Validity of Claims-Based Diagnostic Codes for Psychotic and Affective Disorders and the Influence of the Coding Transition from the ICD-9 to the ICD-10 in Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database.评估基于索赔的精神病性和情感性障碍诊断编码的有效性以及台湾全民健康保险研究数据库中从国际疾病分类第九版(ICD-9)到国际疾病分类第十版(ICD-10)编码转换的影响。
Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Jul 10;17:635-645. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S522618. eCollection 2025.
4
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
5
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
6
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
7
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.抗体检测用于鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 的现症感染和既往感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2.
8
Women's experience of menopause: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.女性更年期经历:定性证据的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Sep 16;13(8):250-337. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1948.
9
Theoretical approaches to the engagement with patients in case-management programmes and assertive outreach teams: A systematic review of the literature.以病例管理计划和积极外展团队为背景下与患者互动的理论方法:文献的系统综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Oct;29(5):647-658. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12831. Epub 2022 Apr 24.
10
[Pseudodementia, what are we talking about? Part II: From Stertz to Alzheimer: A psychogenic disease after trauma].[假性痴呆,我们在谈论什么?第二部分:从施特尔茨到阿尔茨海默病:创伤后的一种心因性疾病]
Encephale. 2015 Jun;41 Suppl 1:S37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.08.015. Epub 2014 Oct 27.