• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者对处方药标签内容和格式的偏好 - 最佳最差标度和离散选择实验研究。

Older adult patient preferences for the content and format of prescription medication labels - A best-worst scaling and discrete choice experiment study.

机构信息

Centre for Ageing Research & Education, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

Centre for Ageing Research & Education, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

出版信息

Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Nov;19(11):1455-1464. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.07.009. Epub 2023 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.07.009
PMID:37507340
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient preferences for the content and format of prescription medication labels (PMLs, i.e., sticker labels placed on medication bottles/packets at dispensing) have been extensively studied. However, accommodating all preferences on PMLs is impractical due to space limitations. Understanding how patients prioritise the content and format attributes of PMLs can inform improvements while working within PML space constraints.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to (1) identify a ranking of medication-related content attributes to be prioritised on PMLs using best-worst scaling (BWS), and (2) determine the relative importance of format attributes when incorporated onto PMLs using discrete choice experiment (DCE), from the perspective of older adult patients in Singapore.

METHODS

Attributes were informed by our prior qualitative study and PML best practice guidelines. For the BWS component, the assessed content attributes were indication, precautions, interaction or paired medicines, food instructions, side effects, expiry date, and missed dose action, all of which are currently not legally mandated on PMLs in Singapore. A BWS object case was used to rank the content attributes. For the DCE component, in a series of questions, participants were asked to choose between two PML options each time, that varied in the presentation of dosage-frequency instructions, font size, presentation of dosage, presentation of precautions, and font colour of precautions. A mixed logit model estimated the relative utilities of format attribute levels, enabling the calculation of importance scores of the format attributes.

RESULTS

The study recruited 280 participants (mean age: 68.8 ± 5.4 years). The three most-preferred content attributes were indication, precautions and interaction or paired medicines. The top three format preferences were tabular style presentation of dosage-frequency instructions, large font size and precautions in red colour.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare institutions should consider improving their PMLs based on the leading content and format preferences voiced by older adult patients. The methodology adopted in the study can also be used for aligning the content and format of other patient education materials with patient preferences.

摘要

背景

患者对处方药物标签(PML,即在配药时贴在药瓶/药袋上的标签)的内容和格式偏好进行了广泛研究。然而,由于空间限制,满足所有 PML 偏好是不切实际的。了解患者如何优先考虑 PML 的内容和格式属性,可以为在 PML 空间限制内进行改进提供信息。

目的

我们旨在(1)使用最佳最差标度法(BWS)确定 PML 上要优先考虑的药物相关内容属性的排名,以及(2)从新加坡老年患者的角度出发,使用离散选择实验(DCE)确定纳入 PML 时格式属性的相对重要性。

方法

属性信息来自我们之前的定性研究和 PML 最佳实践指南。在 BWS 部分,评估的内容属性为适应证、注意事项、相互作用或联合用药、饮食说明、副作用、有效期和漏服剂量措施,所有这些内容目前在新加坡的 PML 上都没有法律要求。使用 BWS 对象案例对内容属性进行排名。在 DCE 部分,参与者在一系列问题中,每次都要在两种 PML 选项中进行选择,这两种选项在剂量-频率说明的呈现方式、字体大小、剂量呈现方式、注意事项呈现方式以及注意事项的字体颜色方面有所不同。混合 logit 模型估计了格式属性水平的相对效用,从而可以计算格式属性的重要性得分。

结果

该研究招募了 280 名参与者(平均年龄:68.8±5.4 岁)。三个最受欢迎的内容属性是适应证、注意事项和相互作用或联合用药。三种最受欢迎的格式偏好是剂量-频率说明的表格样式呈现、大字体和红色的注意事项。

结论

医疗机构应根据老年患者提出的主要内容和格式偏好来改进其 PML。该研究采用的方法也可用于使其他患者教育材料的内容和格式与患者偏好保持一致。

相似文献

1
Older adult patient preferences for the content and format of prescription medication labels - A best-worst scaling and discrete choice experiment study.老年患者对处方药标签内容和格式的偏好 - 最佳最差标度和离散选择实验研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Nov;19(11):1455-1464. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.07.009. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
2
Attribute Selection for a Discrete Choice Experiment Incorporating a Best-Worst Scaling Survey.纳入最佳最差标度调查的离散选择实验的属性选择。
Value Health. 2021 Apr;24(4):575-584. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.10.025. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
3
A Systematic Review Comparing the Acceptability, Validity and Concordance of Discrete Choice Experiments and Best-Worst Scaling for Eliciting Preferences in Healthcare.系统评价比较离散选择实验和最佳最差量表在医疗保健中偏好 elicitation 的可接受性、有效性和一致性。
Patient. 2018 Jun;11(3):301-317. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0288-y.
4
Comparing Outcomes of a Discrete Choice Experiment and Case 2 Best-Worst Scaling: An Application to Neuromuscular Disease Treatment.比较离散选择实验和案例 2 最佳最差标度的结果:在神经肌肉疾病治疗中的应用。
Patient. 2023 May;16(3):239-253. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00615-0. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
5
Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.澳大利亚公众对新医疗技术资金投入的偏好:离散选择法与轮廓案例最佳-最差尺度法的比较
Med Decis Making. 2014 Jul;34(5):638-54. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14526640. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
6
Comparing the Self-Reported Acceptability of Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling: An Empirical Study in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.比较离散选择实验和最佳-最差标度法的自我报告可接受性:2型糖尿病患者的实证研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Aug 30;18:1803-1813. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S470310. eCollection 2024.
7
A think aloud study comparing the validity and acceptability of discrete choice and best worst scaling methods.一项出声思考研究,比较离散选择法和最佳-最差标度法的有效性和可接受性。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 23;9(4):e90635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090635. eCollection 2014.
8
Collecting Physicians' Preferences on Medical Devices: Are We Doing It Right? Evidence from Italian Orthopedists Using 2 Different Stated Preference Methods.收集医师对医疗器械的偏好:我们做对了吗?意大利骨科医生使用 2 种不同的陈述偏好方法得出的证据。
Med Decis Making. 2023 Oct-Nov;43(7-8):886-900. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231201805. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
9
Patient preferences for osteoarthritis pain and chronic low back pain treatments in the United States: a discrete-choice experiment.美国患者对骨关节炎疼痛和慢性下腰痛治疗的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020 Sep;28(9):1202-1213. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.06.006. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
10
Patient Preferences for Device-Aided Treatments Indicated for Advanced Parkinson Disease.晚期帕金森病适用的器械辅助治疗的患者偏好
Value Health. 2017 Dec;20(10):1383-1393. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Using best-worst scaling experiment to understand factors influencing self-medication practices with antimicrobial drugs: A survey of students studying health programs at a tertiary institution in Ghana.运用最佳-最差尺度实验来了解影响抗菌药物自我药疗行为的因素:对加纳一所高等院校健康专业学生的调查。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Aug 6;5(8):e0004748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004748. eCollection 2025.
2
Healthcare workers' priorities of WHO snakebite strategic objectives for the control and prevention of snakebite envenoming in Ghana: A machine learning statistical design of experiment modeling.加纳医护人员对世界卫生组织蛇咬伤控制与预防战略目标的优先排序:基于机器学习的实验建模统计设计
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Jul 10;19(7):e0013295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013295. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.