Department of Medical Humanities and Social Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, 262 Gamcheon-ro, Seo-gu, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Jul 28;22(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01960-0.
This study aimed to quantify the contribution of narrowing the life expectancy gap between urban and rural areas to the overall life expectancy at birth in Korea and examine the age and death cause-specific contribution to changes in the life expectancy gap between urban and rural areas.
We used the registration population and death statistics from Statistics Korea from 2000 to 2019. Assuming two hypothetical scenarios, namely, the same age-specific mortality change rate in urban and rural areas and a 20% faster decline than the observed decline rate in rural areas, we compared the increase in life expectancy with the actual increase. Changes in the life expectancy gap between urban and rural areas were decomposed into age- and cause-specific contributions.
Rural disadvantages of life expectancy were evident. However, life expectancies in rural areas increased more rapidly than in urban areas. Life expectancy would have increased 0.3-0.5 less if the decline rate of age-specific mortality in small-to-middle urban and rural areas were the same as that of large urban areas. Life expectancy would have increased 0.7-0.9 years further if the decline rate of age-specific mortality in small-to-middle urban and rural areas had been 20% higher. The age groups 15-39 and 40-64, and chronic diseases, such as neoplasms and diseases of the digestive system, and external causes significantly contributed to narrowing the life expectancy gap between urban and rural areas.
Pro-health equity interventions would be a good strategy to reduce the life expectancy gap and increase overall life expectancy, particularly in societies where life expectancies have already increased.
本研究旨在量化缩小城乡预期寿命差距对韩国出生时总体预期寿命的贡献,并检验年龄和死因特异性对城乡预期寿命差距变化的贡献。
我们使用了韩国统计厅从 2000 年到 2019 年的登记人口和死亡统计数据。假设两种假设情况,即城乡地区的特定年龄死亡率变化率相同,以及农村地区的下降速度比观察到的下降速度快 20%,我们将预期寿命的增加与实际增加进行了比较。城乡预期寿命差距的变化被分解为年龄和死因特异性贡献。
城乡预期寿命差距明显不利。然而,农村地区的预期寿命增长速度快于城市地区。如果小到中等城市和农村地区的特定年龄死亡率下降率与大城市相同,预期寿命将增加 0.3-0.5 岁。如果小到中等城市和农村地区的特定年龄死亡率下降率提高 20%,预期寿命将进一步增加 0.7-0.9 岁。15-39 岁和 40-64 岁年龄组,以及肿瘤和消化系统疾病等慢性病以及外部原因对缩小城乡预期寿命差距有显著贡献。
促进健康公平的干预措施将是减少预期寿命差距和提高总体预期寿命的一个好策略,特别是在预期寿命已经提高的社会中。