• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用人因分析与分类系统及逻辑回归对台湾地区药物相关不良事件进行人为错误分析与建模

Human Error Analysis and Modeling of Medication-Related Adverse Events in Taiwan Using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System and Logistic Regression.

作者信息

Ko Shu-Huan, Hsieh Min-Chih, Huang Run-Feng

机构信息

Department of Marketing and Logistics Management, Vanung University, Taoyuan 320313, Taiwan.

Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 19;11(14):2063. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11142063.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare11142063
PMID:37510504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10379412/
Abstract

Medical institutions worldwide strive to avoid adverse medical events, including adverse medication-related events. However, studies on the comprehensive analysis of medication-related adverse events are limited. Therefore, we aimed to identify the error factors contributing to medication-related adverse events using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) and to develop error models through logistic regression. These models calculate the probability of a medication-related adverse event when a healthcare system defect occurs. Seven experts with at least 12 years of work experience (four nurses and three pharmacists) were recruited to analyze thirty-seven medication-related adverse events. The findings indicate that decision errors, physical/mental limitations, failure to correct problems, and organizational processes were the four factors that most frequently contributed to errors at the four levels of the HFACS. Seven error models of two types (error occurrence and error analysis pathways) were established using logistic regression models, and the relative probabilities of failure factor occurrences were calculated. Based on our results, medical staff can use the error models as a new analytical approach to improve and prevent adverse medication events, thereby improving patient safety.

摘要

全球医疗机构都在努力避免不良医疗事件,包括与用药相关的不良事件。然而,关于用药相关不良事件综合分析的研究有限。因此,我们旨在使用人为因素分析和分类系统(HFACS)来识别导致用药相关不良事件的错误因素,并通过逻辑回归建立错误模型。这些模型计算医疗系统出现缺陷时用药相关不良事件的发生概率。招募了七名具有至少12年工作经验的专家(四名护士和三名药剂师)来分析37起用药相关不良事件。研究结果表明,决策错误、身体/精神限制、未能纠正问题以及组织流程是在HFACS四个层面上最常导致错误的四个因素。使用逻辑回归模型建立了两种类型(错误发生和错误分析途径)的七个错误模型,并计算了失败因素发生的相对概率。根据我们的结果,医务人员可以将错误模型作为一种新的分析方法,以改善和预防用药不良事件,从而提高患者安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dc7/10379412/7c5953db119e/healthcare-11-02063-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dc7/10379412/97b2e5fa7162/healthcare-11-02063-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dc7/10379412/3ac703dafe29/healthcare-11-02063-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dc7/10379412/7c5953db119e/healthcare-11-02063-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dc7/10379412/97b2e5fa7162/healthcare-11-02063-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dc7/10379412/3ac703dafe29/healthcare-11-02063-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dc7/10379412/7c5953db119e/healthcare-11-02063-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Human Error Analysis and Modeling of Medication-Related Adverse Events in Taiwan Using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System and Logistic Regression.运用人因分析与分类系统及逻辑回归对台湾地区药物相关不良事件进行人为错误分析与建模
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 19;11(14):2063. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11142063.
2
An Investigation of Human Errors in Medication Adverse Event Improvement Priority Using a Hybrid Approach.使用混合方法对药物不良事件改善优先级中的人为错误进行的调查。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Apr 9;9(4):442. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9040442.
3
Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors.在初级保健中采取专业、结构和组织干预措施以减少用药错误。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 4;10(10):CD003942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003942.pub3.
4
A novel framework for human factors analysis and classification system for medical errors (HFACS-MES)-A Delphi study and causality analysis.一种新的人为因素分析和医疗差错分类系统(HFACS-MES)框架——德尔菲研究和因果分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0298606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298606. eCollection 2024.
5
Inter-rater reliability of medication error classification in a voluntary patient safety incident reporting system HaiPro in Finland.芬兰 HaiPro 自愿性患者安全事件报告系统中药物错误分类的评价者间信度。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Jul;15(7):864-872. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Medication errors and adverse drug events in a UK hospital during the optimisation of electronic prescriptions: a prospective observational study.在优化电子处方期间,英国一家医院的药物错误和药物不良事件:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Dec;1(8):e403-e412. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30158-X. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
8
Application of "Human Factor Analysis and Classification System" (HFACS) Model to the Prevention of Medical Errors and Adverse Events: A Systematic Review.“人为因素分析与分类系统”(HFACS)模型在预防医疗差错和不良事件中的应用:一项系统评价
Int J Prev Med. 2023 Nov 30;14:127. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_123_22. eCollection 2023.
9
Roles and systems for routine medication administration to prevent medication errors in hospital-based, acute care settings: a systematic review.在医院急性护理环境中预防用药错误的常规用药管理的角色与系统:一项系统综述
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2010;8(10):405-446. doi: 10.11124/01938924-201008100-00001.
10
Repeat medication errors in nursing homes: Contributing factors and their association with patient harm.养老院中的重复用药错误:促成因素及其与患者伤害的关联。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2010 Jun;8(3):258-70. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2010.05.005.

本文引用的文献

1
An Investigation of Human Errors in Medication Adverse Event Improvement Priority Using a Hybrid Approach.使用混合方法对药物不良事件改善优先级中的人为错误进行的调查。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Apr 9;9(4):442. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9040442.
2
Impact of pharmacist interventions on medication errors in hospitalized pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.药师干预对住院儿科患者用药错误的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Aug;42(4):979-994. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01034-z. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
3
Medication errors in prescription and administration in critically ill patients.
危重症患者处方和给药中的用药错误。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 May;76(5):1192-1200. doi: 10.1111/jan.14322. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
4
Strategies to minimize medication errors in emergency units: an integrative review.急诊科减少用药错误的策略:一项综合综述。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2019 Feb;72(suppl 1):307-314. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0658.
5
A hybrid human and organisational analysis method for railway accidents based on STAMP-HFACS and human information processing.基于 STAMP-HFACS 和人类信息处理的铁路事故混合人因分析方法
Appl Ergon. 2019 Sep;79:122-142. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.12.011. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
6
Latent human error analysis and efficient improvement strategies by fuzzy TOPSIS in aviation maintenance tasks.基于模糊TOPSIS法的航空维修任务中潜在人为差错分析及高效改进策略
Appl Ergon. 2016 May;54:136-47. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.11.017. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
7
Factors associated with adverse events resulting from medical errors in the emergency department: two work better than one.急诊科医疗差错导致不良事件的相关因素:两人协作效果更佳。
J Emerg Med. 2013 Aug;45(2):157-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.11.061. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
8
Tenfold medication errors: 5 years' experience at a university-affiliated pediatric hospital.十倍用药差错:一家大学附属儿童医院五年经验。
Pediatrics. 2012 May;129(5):916-24. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2526. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
9
Reducing prescribing errors in the paediatric intensive care unit: an experience from Egypt.减少儿科重症监护病房的处方错误:来自埃及的经验。
Acta Paediatr. 2011 Oct;100(10):e169-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02270.x. Epub 2011 May 5.
10
The effects of error management climate and safety communication on safety: a multi-level study.错误管理氛围和安全沟通对安全的影响:一项多层次研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Sep;42(5):1498-506. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.01.003. Epub 2010 Feb 2.