• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者手辅助腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的短期和长期预后

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Elderly Patients Following Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastasis.

作者信息

Mahamid Ahmad, Abu-Zaydeh Omar, Mattar Samar, Kazlow Esther, Froylich Dvir, Sawaied Muneer, Goldberg Natalia, Berger Yael, Sadot Eran, Haddad Riad

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa 3436212, Israel.

The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 20;12(14):4785. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144785.

DOI:10.3390/jcm12144785
PMID:37510900
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10381412/
Abstract

(1) Background: Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) has engendered growing attention as a safe procedure for the resection of metastatic liver disease. However, there is little data available regarding the outcomes of HALS for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) in patients over the age of 75. (2) Methods: We compare the short- and long-term outcomes of patients >75-years-old (defined in our study as "elderly patients" and referred to as group 1, G1), with patients <75-years-old (defined in our study as "younger patients" and referred to as group 2, G2). (3) Results: Of 145 patients, 28 were in G1 and 117 were in G2. The most common site of the primary tumor was the right colon in G1, and the left colon in G2 ( = 0.05). More patients in G1 underwent laparoscopic anterior segment resection compared with G2 (43% vs. 39% respectively) ( = 0.003). 53% of patients in G1 and 74% of patients in G2 completed neoadjuvant therapy ( = 0.04). The median size of the largest metastasis was 32 (IQR 19-52) mm in G1 and 20 (IQR 13-35) mm in G2 ( = 0.001). The rate of complications (Dindo-Clavien grade ≥ III) was slightly higher in G1 ( = 0.06). The overall 5-year survival was 30% in G1 and 52% in G2 ( = 0.12). (4) Conclusions: Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for colorectal liver metastasis is safe and effective in an elderly patient population.

摘要

(1) 背景:手辅助腹腔镜手术(HALS)作为一种安全的转移性肝病切除手术,已引起越来越多的关注。然而,关于75岁以上患者结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)的HALS手术结果,现有数据很少。(2) 方法:我们比较了年龄大于75岁(在本研究中定义为“老年患者”,称为第1组,G1)和年龄小于75岁(在本研究中定义为“年轻患者”,称为第2组,G2)患者的短期和长期结果。(3) 结果:145例患者中,28例在G1组,117例在G2组。G1组原发性肿瘤最常见部位是右半结肠,G2组是左半结肠(P = 0.05)。与G2组相比,G1组更多患者接受了腹腔镜前段切除术(分别为43%对39%)(P = 0.003)。G1组53%的患者和G2组74%的患者完成了新辅助治疗(P = 0.04)。G1组最大转移灶的中位大小为32(四分位间距19 - 52)mm,G2组为20(四分位间距13 - 35)mm(P = 0.001)。G1组并发症发生率(Dindo-Clavien分级≥III级)略高(P = 0.06)。G1组总体5年生存率为30%,G2组为52%(P = 0.12)。(4) 结论:手辅助腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌肝转移在老年患者群体中是安全有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85cd/10381412/14024b95dbe1/jcm-12-04785-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85cd/10381412/14024b95dbe1/jcm-12-04785-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85cd/10381412/14024b95dbe1/jcm-12-04785-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Elderly Patients Following Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastasis.老年患者手辅助腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的短期和长期预后
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 20;12(14):4785. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144785.
2
Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery in Elderly Patients-A Single-Center Experience.老年患者的微创肝脏手术——单中心经验。
J Surg Res. 2019 Jul;239:92-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.01.058. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
3
Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Is Superior to Open Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Posterosuperior Segments.对于后上段的结直肠癌肝转移,手辅助腹腔镜手术优于开腹肝切除术。
Front Surg. 2021 Nov 25;8:746427. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.746427. eCollection 2021.
4
Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic sigmoid resection without diversion in perforated diverticulitis.腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗穿孔性憩室炎的安全性和可行性。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1336-1342. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06910-y. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
5
The Feasibility of Hand-assisted Laparoscopic and Laparoscopic Multivisceral Resection Compared With Open Surgery for Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer.手辅助腹腔镜和腹腔镜多脏器切除术与开放手术治疗局部进展期结直肠癌的可行性比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Aug;27(4):e57-e65. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000428.
6
[Comparison between laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for left colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled study with 3-year follow-up results].腹腔镜辅助经自然腔道标本取出手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗左半结肠癌的比较:一项随访3年的随机对照研究
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jul 25;25(7):604-611. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20220129-00040.
7
Outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgeries in elderly patients with right colon cancers: A case-control study.老年右半结肠癌患者开放手术、腹腔镜手术及手辅助腹腔镜手术的疗效:一项病例对照研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(35):e11907. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011907.
8
A novel hand-assisted laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项针对右半结肠癌的新型手辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2017 Jul 26;18(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2084-3.
9
Hand-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: Practice patterns and clinical outcomes in a minimally-invasive colorectal practice.手辅助与腹腔镜辅助结直肠手术:微创结直肠手术的实践模式与临床结果
Surg Endosc. 2008 Mar;22(3):739-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9477-4.
10
Two cases of laparoscopic simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases in elderly patients.两例老年患者腹腔镜同期切除结直肠癌并同步肝转移灶
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2016;26:134-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.07.030. Epub 2016 Jul 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastasis: Analysis of Short-term and Long-term Results.手助腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠肝转移:短期和长期结果分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2021 Mar 31;31(5):543-549. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000931.
2
Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies.全球结直肠癌负担:趋势、风险因素和预防策略。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Dec;16(12):713-732. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0189-8. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
3
Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery in Elderly Patients-A Single-Center Experience.
老年患者的微创肝脏手术——单中心经验。
J Surg Res. 2019 Jul;239:92-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.01.058. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
4
Laparoscopic hand-assisted liver resection for tumours in the left lateral section.腹腔镜手辅助下左外叶肿瘤肝切除术
J Minim Access Surg. 2020 Jan-Mar;16(1):35-40. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_148_18.
5
The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: From Indication to Implementation.《南安普敦腹腔镜肝手术共识指南:从适应证到实施》。
Ann Surg. 2018 Jul;268(1):11-18. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002524.
6
Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases in Elderly and Octogenarian Patients: A Multicenter Propensity Score Based Analysis of Short- and Long-term Outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗老年和八旬老年患者结直肠癌肝转移:基于倾向评分的短期和长期结局的多中心分析。
Ann Surg. 2017 Jun;265(6):1192-1200. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002147.
7
Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Elderly Patients: A Comparative Study From a Single Center.老年患者腹腔镜肝切除术的手术效果:一项单中心的对比研究
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Aug;25(4):e109-12. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000183.
8
Nationwide trends in incidence, treatment and survival of colorectal cancer patients with synchronous metastases.结直肠癌伴同时性转移患者的发病率、治疗及生存的全国性趋势
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2015 Jun;32(5):457-65. doi: 10.1007/s10585-015-9719-0. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
9
Open versus laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (the Oslo-CoMet Study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.开放性与腹腔镜肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移(奥斯陆-结直肠癌肝转移研究):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Mar 4;16:73. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0577-5.
10
Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka.腹腔镜肝切除术推荐意见:在盛冈召开的第二届国际共识会议报告
Ann Surg. 2015 Apr;261(4):619-29. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001184.