Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中采用“单结-单连续缝合”膀胱尿道吻合术并进行后肌筋膜重建:手术技术分步指南

"Single Knot-Single Running Suture" Vesicourethral Anastomosis with Posterior Musculofascial Reconstruction during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Step-by-Step Guide of Surgical Technique.

作者信息

Flammia Rocco Simone, Bologna Eugenio, Anceschi Umberto, Tufano Antonio, Licari Leslie Claire, Antonelli Luca, Proietti Flavia, Alviani Federico, Gallucci Michele, Simone Giuseppe, Leonardo Costantino

机构信息

Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, 00161 Rome, Italy.

Department of Urology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2023 Jun 29;13(7):1072. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071072.

Abstract

Our aim is to describe Gallucci's (VV-G) technique for vesicourethral anastomosis and posterior musculofascial reconstruction (PMFR) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to assess early urinary continence recovery and perioperative outcomes. VV-G consists of a "single knot-single running suture" vesicourethral anastomosis with PMFR. Between September 2019 and October 2021, we prospectively compared VV-G vs. conventional Van Velthoven anastomosis (VV-STD) during RARP. We excluded patients with urinary incontinence, pelvic radiotherapy, and urethral and BPH surgery prior to RARP. Social continence (SC) recovery, perioperative complications, and length of hospital stay (LOS) were compared between VV-G vs. VV-STD. SC was defined as 0-1 pad/die. We applied 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) adjusting for different covariates (age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, BMI, prostate volume, nerve-sparing and lymph node dissection). From 166 patients, 1:1 PSM resulted in two equally sized groups of 40 patients each with no residual differences (all ≥ 0.2). VV-G yielded higher 3-month SC rates than VV-STD (97.5 vs. 55.0%, < 0.001). A tiny difference was still recorded at one-year follow-up (97.5 vs. 80.0%, = 0.029, HR: 2.90, 95% CI: 1.74-4.85, < 0.001). Conversely, we observed no differences in any perioperative complications (15.0 vs. 22.5%, OR: 0.61, 95% CI 0.19-1.88, = 0.4) and LOS (3 vs. 4 days, Δ: -0.69 ± 0.61, = 0.1). : VV-G significantly improved early SC recovery without increasing perioperative morbidity. In our opinion, VV-G represents an easy-to-learn and easy-to-teach technique due to its single-suture, single-knot, and symmetrical design.

摘要

我们的目的是描述在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)期间用于膀胱尿道吻合术和后肌筋膜重建(PMFR)的加卢奇(VV-G)技术,并评估早期尿失禁恢复情况和围手术期结果。VV-G包括采用PMFR的“单结-单连续缝合”膀胱尿道吻合术。在2019年9月至2021年10月期间,我们在RARP期间前瞻性地比较了VV-G与传统的范·韦尔特霍芬吻合术(VV-STD)。我们排除了RARP术前存在尿失禁、盆腔放疗以及尿道和良性前列腺增生手术史的患者。比较了VV-G与VV-STD之间的社会尿失禁(SC)恢复情况、围手术期并发症和住院时间(LOS)。SC定义为每天使用0 - 1片尿垫。我们应用1:1倾向评分匹配(PSM)对不同协变量(年龄、查尔森合并症指数、体重指数、前列腺体积、保留神经和淋巴结清扫)进行调整。从166例患者中,1:1 PSM产生了两组各40例患者的同等规模组,且无残留差异(所有P≥0.2)。VV-G的3个月SC率高于VV-STD(97.5%对55.0%,P<0.001)。在一年随访时仍记录到微小差异(97.5%对80.0%,P = 0.029,HR:2.90,95%CI:1.74 - 4.85,P<0.001)。相反,我们观察到在任何围手术期并发症(15.0%对22.5%,OR:0.61,95%CI 0.19 - 1.88,P = 0.4)和LOS(3天对4天,Δ:-0.69±0.61,P = 0.1)方面没有差异。结论:VV-G显著改善了早期SC恢复,且未增加围手术期发病率。我们认为,由于其单缝合、单结和对称设计,VV-G是一种易于学习和传授的技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4a5/10381871/84043c761315/jpm-13-01072-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验