• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

杂交机器人单孔子宫切除术与单端口全腹腔镜子宫切除术的可行性及手术结果比较

Feasibility and Surgical Outcomes of Hybrid Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy Compared with Single-Port Access Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.

作者信息

Noh Joseph J, Jeon Jung-Eun, Jung Ji-Hee, Kim Tae-Joong

机构信息

Gynecologic Cancer Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2023 Jul 24;13(7):1178. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071178.

DOI:10.3390/jpm13071178
PMID:37511791
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10382033/
Abstract

We compared surgical outcomes between single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPA-TLH) and hybrid robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSSH), a new technique of combining the benefits of SPA-TLH with RSSH in this study. A total of 64 patients were retrospectively analyzed. They underwent either hybrid RSSH or SPA-TLH for benign gynecologic disease between December 2018 and August 2021. To assess the feasibility of hybrid RSSH, the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared between the hybrid RSSH group (n = 29) and the SPA-TLH group (n = 35). All of the surgeries were completed without requiring additional ports or conversion to laparotomy. The surgical outcomes including total operative time, uterine weight, estimated blood loss, hemoglobin changes, length of hospital stay, and postoperative pain scores were not significantly different between the two groups. The colpotomy time, including the detachment of the uterosacral and cardinal ligaments, was shorter in the hybrid RSSH group than in the SPA-TLH group (8.0 min vs. 14.0 min; = 0.029). However, the vaginal cuff closure time was longer in the hybrid RSSH group than in the SPA-TLH group (15.0 min vs.10.0 min; = 0.001). No difference was observed with regards to intraoperative and postoperative complications. Hybrid RSSH appears to be a feasible procedure for hysterectomy in patients with benign gynecologic diseases.

摘要

在本研究中,我们比较了单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术(SPA-TLH)与混合机器人单部位子宫切除术(RSSH,一种结合了SPA-TLH和RSSH优点的新技术)的手术效果。对64例患者进行了回顾性分析。2018年12月至2021年8月期间,她们因良性妇科疾病接受了混合RSSH或SPA-TLH手术。为评估混合RSSH的可行性,比较了混合RSSH组(n = 29)和SPA-TLH组(n = 35)的临床特征和手术效果。所有手术均无需额外打孔或转为开腹手术即可完成。两组的手术效果,包括总手术时间、子宫重量、估计失血量、血红蛋白变化、住院时间和术后疼痛评分,差异均无统计学意义。混合RSSH组的阴道断端缝合时间,包括子宫骶韧带和主韧带的离断时间,比SPA-TLH组短(8.0分钟对14.0分钟;P = 0.029)。然而,混合RSSH组的阴道断端关闭时间比SPA-TLH组长(15.0分钟对10.0分钟;P = 0.001)。术中及术后并发症方面未观察到差异。混合RSSH似乎是治疗良性妇科疾病患者子宫切除术的一种可行术式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7275/10382033/1e3f33831174/jpm-13-01178-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7275/10382033/1e3f33831174/jpm-13-01178-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7275/10382033/1e3f33831174/jpm-13-01178-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Feasibility and Surgical Outcomes of Hybrid Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy Compared with Single-Port Access Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.杂交机器人单孔子宫切除术与单端口全腹腔镜子宫切除术的可行性及手术结果比较
J Pers Med. 2023 Jul 24;13(7):1178. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071178.
2
Abdominal, multi-port and single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy: eleven-year trends comparison of surgical outcomes complications of 936 cases.腹部、多端口与单端口全腹腔镜子宫切除术:936例手术结果及并发症的11年趋势比较
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;291(6):1313-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3576-y. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
3
Operative outcomes of single-port-access laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with single-port-access total laparoscopic hysterectomy.经单孔腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术与经单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术的手术效果比较。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;53(4):486-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2013.07.003.
4
A comparison of postoperative pain after transumbilical single-port access and conventional three-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.经脐单孔入路与传统三孔全腹腔镜子宫切除术后疼痛的比较:一项随机对照试验
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Dec;94(12):1290-6. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12767. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
5
Transition from multiport to single-site surgery: A single institution experience in robotic supracervical hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases.从多孔道到单孔道手术的转变:机器人辅助经阴道子宫切除术治疗良性妇科疾病的单中心经验。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul;58(4):514-519. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2019.05.015.
6
Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes.经脐单孔与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术:手术结局比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jul;203(1):26.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.026. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
7
Single-port access versus conventional multi-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy for very large uterus.单孔入路与传统多孔入路全腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗超大子宫
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2015 May;58(3):239-45. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2015.58.3.239. Epub 2015 May 19.
8
Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.单部位与多端口机器人辅助子宫切除术治疗良性妇科疾病:手术结局的回顾性评估及成本分析
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 May-Jun;23(4):603-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
9
An analysis of the impact of previous laparoscopic hysterectomy experience on the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy.既往腹腔镜子宫切除术经验对机器人辅助子宫切除术学习曲线影响的分析
J Robot Surg. 2013 Sep;7(3):295-9. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0388-6. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
10
Comparison of surgical outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy in gynecologic benign disease: a single-center cohort study.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术与传统全腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗妇科良性疾病的手术效果比较:一项单中心队列研究
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2221-2228. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01638-3. Epub 2023 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Cost of Single-Site Robotic Surgery and Single-Site Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecological Diseases: The Era of Single-Site Robotic Surgery May Have Arrived.单孔机器人手术与单孔腹腔镜手术治疗妇科疾病的有效性及成本的系统评价与Meta分析:单孔机器人手术时代或已来临
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2025 Sep;8(9):e70327. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.70327.
2
On-demand robotic surgery for hysterectomies: A combination of the best of robotic and laparoscopic approach.按需进行的子宫切除术机器人手术:机器人手术与腹腔镜手术最佳方法的结合。
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251325029. doi: 10.1177/17455057251325029. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Robot-Assisted Surgery for Endometriosis Current and Future Perspectives.机器人辅助手术治疗子宫内膜异位症:现状与未来展望。
Surg Technol Int. 2022 May 19;40:197-202. doi: 10.52198/22.STI.40.GY1562.
2
Learning Curve Analysis of Single-Site Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy.单孔机器人辅助子宫切除术的学习曲线分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 2;11(5):1378. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051378.
3
Single-port access (SPA) laparoscopic myomectomy with uterine artery ligation via a retroperitoneal approach is feasible in women with large uterine leiomyoma.
Comparison Between Robotic and Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Performed Using Single-Port Approach.
单孔入路机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术的比较
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;18(1):e70044. doi: 10.1111/ases.70044.
经腹膜后途径行单孔腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术联合子宫动脉结扎术治疗巨大子宫肌瘤可行。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul;60(4):752-757. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2021.05.029.
4
Robotic single-port platform for gynecologic surgery: indications, outcomes and challenges.用于妇科手术的机器人单孔平台:适应证、手术结果及挑战
Updates Surg. 2021 Dec;73(6):2391-2392. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-00972-1. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
5
Advantages of robotic surgery in the treatment of complex pelvic organs prolapse.机器人手术在复杂盆腔器官脱垂治疗中的优势。
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):1115-1124. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00913-4. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
6
Incisional hernia after 2498 single-port access (SPA) gynecologic surgery over a 10-year period.10 年间 2498 例单孔腹腔镜妇科手术的切口疝。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 15;10(1):17388. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74471-5.
7
A Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Site Robotic, Multiport Robotic and Conventional Laparoscopic Techniques in Performing Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.单孔机器人手术、多孔机器人手术与传统腹腔镜技术在良性指征子宫切除术中的手术效果比较
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2020 Apr 28;9(2):59-63. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_68_19. eCollection 2020 Apr-Jun.
8
The robotic single-port platform for gynecologic surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.用于妇科手术的机器人单孔平台:文献系统评价和荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):1155-1167. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00812-8. Epub 2020 May 29.
9
Robotic Surgery in Gynecology.机器人手术在妇科中的应用。
Surg Clin North Am. 2020 Apr;100(2):445-460. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2019.12.007. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
10
Robotic versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与单孔腹腔镜子宫切除术:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Robot Surg. 2020 Oct;14(5):679-686. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01042-1. Epub 2020 Jan 19.