• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经脐单孔与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术:手术结局比较。

Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes.

机构信息

Women's Cancer Clinic, Severance Hospital, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jul;203(1):26.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.026. Epub 2010 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.026
PMID:20417481
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to compare surgical outcomes and postoperative pain between transumbilical single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPA-TLH) and conventional 4-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH).

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed 157 patients who underwent SPA-TLH (n = 52) or conventional TLH (n = 105). A single-port access system consisted of a wound retractor, surgical glove, 2 5 mm trocars, and 1 10/11 mm trocar.

RESULTS

The SPA-TLH group had less intraoperative blood loss (P < .001), shorter hospital stay (P = .001), and earlier diet intake (P < .001) compared with the conventional TLH group. There was no difference in perioperative complications. Immediate postoperative pain score was lower in the SPA-TLH group (P < .001). Postoperative pain after 6 and 24 hours was lower in SPA-TLH with marginal statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

SPA-TLH is a feasible method for hysterectomy with lower immediate postoperative pain and better surgical outcomes with respect to recovery time compared with conventional TLH.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较经脐单孔通道全腹腔镜子宫切除术(SPA-TLH)与传统四孔全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)的手术结果和术后疼痛。

设计

我们回顾性分析了 157 例接受 SPA-TLH(n=52)或传统 TLH(n=105)的患者。单孔通道系统由切口牵开器、手术手套、2 个 5mm 套管和 1 个 10/11mm 套管组成。

结果

与传统 TLH 组相比,SPA-TLH 组术中出血量更少(P<.001),住院时间更短(P=.001),饮食摄入更早(P<.001)。两组围手术期并发症无差异。SPA-TLH 组即刻术后疼痛评分较低(P<.001)。SPA-TLH 组术后 6 小时和 24 小时的疼痛评分较低,但差异无统计学意义。

结论

与传统 TLH 相比,SPA-TLH 是一种可行的子宫切除术方法,具有较低的即刻术后疼痛和更好的手术结果,恢复时间更快。

相似文献

1
Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes.经脐单孔与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术:手术结局比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jul;203(1):26.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.026. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
2
A comparison of postoperative pain after transumbilical single-port access and conventional three-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.经脐单孔入路与传统三孔全腹腔镜子宫切除术后疼痛的比较:一项随机对照试验
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Dec;94(12):1290-6. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12767. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
3
Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.腹腔镜子宫切除术:凯撒医疗集团圣地亚哥分院的经验
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Jan-Feb;12(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2004.12.022.
4
Is single-port access laparoscopy less painful than conventional laparoscopy for adnexal surgery? A comparison of postoperative pain and surgical outcomes.单孔腹腔镜附件手术是否比传统腹腔镜手术疼痛更轻?术后疼痛与手术结果的比较。
Surg Innov. 2013 Feb;20(1):46-54. doi: 10.1177/1553350612439632. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
5
Abdominal, multi-port and single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy: eleven-year trends comparison of surgical outcomes complications of 936 cases.腹部、多端口与单端口全腹腔镜子宫切除术:936例手术结果及并发症的11年趋势比较
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;291(6):1313-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3576-y. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
6
Operative outcomes of single-port-access laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with single-port-access total laparoscopic hysterectomy.经单孔腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术与经单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术的手术效果比较。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;53(4):486-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2013.07.003.
7
[Comparison of three subcategories of laparoscopic hysterectomy].[腹腔镜子宫切除术三种亚类的比较]
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2007 Jun;29(3):418-21.
8
Learning curve and surgical outcome for single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy in 100 consecutive cases.100 例连续单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术的学习曲线和手术结果。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;72(4):227-33. doi: 10.1159/000324384. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
9
Minilaparoscopic versus single-port total hysterectomy: a randomized trial.迷你腹腔镜与单孔式全子宫切除术:一项随机试验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):192-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.11.007. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
10
Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence.单孔脐部腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜肾切除术:围手术期结果及短期康复指标的比较
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.08.019. Epub 2008 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-Port Versus Reduced-Port (1 + 1) Robotic Myomectomy and Hysterectomy.单孔与减孔(1+1)机器人子宫肌瘤切除术和子宫切除术
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 31;13(21):6563. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216563.
2
What is the role of robotic surgery in ovarian cystectomy with fertility preservation?机器人手术在保留生育功能的卵巢囊肿切除术中的作用是什么?
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2743-2747. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01704-w. Epub 2023 Sep 10.
3
Comparison of efficacy of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic treatment for uterine leiomyoma: a latest meta-analysis.
单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗子宫肌瘤的疗效比较:一项最新的荟萃分析。
Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 2;13:1192582. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1192582. eCollection 2023.
4
Feasibility and Surgical Outcomes of Hybrid Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy Compared with Single-Port Access Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.杂交机器人单孔子宫切除术与单端口全腹腔镜子宫切除术的可行性及手术结果比较
J Pers Med. 2023 Jul 24;13(7):1178. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071178.
5
Comparison between Robotic Single-Site and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy: Multicentric Analysis of Surgical Outcomes.机器人单孔与经脐单孔腹腔镜子宫切除术的比较:手术结局的多中心分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 8;59(1):122. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010122.
6
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Adnexectomy by Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) Versus Single-Port Access (SPA) Surgery.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)与单孔腹腔镜手术(SPA)行附件切除术的手术效果比较
J Pers Med. 2022 Dec 2;12(12):1996. doi: 10.3390/jpm12121996.
7
Long-term Experience of Single-port and Multi-port Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in a Single Center.单孔与多孔全腹腔镜子宫切除术在单中心的长期经验。
In Vivo. 2022 Sep-Oct;36(5):2409-2413. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12974.
8
Da Vinci SP Single-Port Robotic Surgery in Gynecologic Tumors: Single Surgeon's Initial Experience with 100 Cases.达芬奇 SP 单孔机器人手术在妇科肿瘤中的应用:单外科医生 100 例初步经验。
Yonsei Med J. 2022 Feb;63(2):179-186. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.2.179.
9
Comparison of Serum Anti-Mullerian Hormone-Level Changes in Single-Port Laparoscopic Endometriotic and Non-Endometriotic Ovarian Cyst Enucleations.单孔腹腔镜下子宫内膜异位症和非子宫内膜异位症卵巢囊肿剥除术中血清抗苗勒管激素水平变化的比较
J Menopausal Med. 2021 Dec;27(3):168-174. doi: 10.6118/jmm.21031.
10
Prediction model of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology using machine learning algorithm.基于机器学习算法的妇科腹腔镜单孔手术预测模型
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021 Sep;16(3):587-596. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.106081. Epub 2021 May 14.