Moon Sun Jae, Ko Ryoung-Eun, Park Chi-Min, Suh Gee Young, Hwang Jinseub, Chung Chi Ryang
Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Nutrients. 2023 Jul 19;15(14):3201. doi: 10.3390/nu15143201.
The optimal timing of enteral nutrition (EN) in sepsis patients is controversial among societal guidelines. We aimed to evaluate the evidence of early EN's impact on critically ill sepsis patients' clinical outcomes. We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICTRP databases on 10 March 2023. We included studies published after 2004 that compared early EN versus delayed EN in sepsis patients. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, cohort studies, and case-control studies. Forest plots were used to summarize risk ratios (RRs), including mortality and mean difference (MD) of continuous variables such as intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and ventilator-free days. We identified 11 eligible studies with sample sizes ranging from 31 to 2410. The RR of short-term mortality from three RCTs was insignificant, and the MD of ICU length of stay from two RCTs was -2.91 and -1.00 days (95% confidence interval [CI], -5.53 to -0.29 and -1.68 to -0.32). Although the RR of intestinal-related complications from one RCT was 3.82 (95% CI, 1.43 to 10.19), indicating a significantly higher risk for the early EN group than the control group, intestinal-related complications of EN reported in five studies were inconclusive. This systematic review did not find significant benefits of early EN on mortality in sepsis patients. Evidence, however, is weak due to inconsistent definitions, heterogeneity, risk of bias, and poor methodology in the existing studies.
在社会指南中,脓毒症患者肠内营养(EN)的最佳时机存在争议。我们旨在评估早期肠内营养对重症脓毒症患者临床结局影响的证据。2023年3月10日,我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆、ClinicalTrials.gov和ICTRP数据库。我们纳入了2004年后发表的比较脓毒症患者早期肠内营养与延迟肠内营养的研究。我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT)、非随机对照试验、队列研究和病例对照研究。森林图用于汇总风险比(RR),包括死亡率以及连续变量(如重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和无呼吸机天数)的平均差(MD)。我们确定了11项符合条件的研究,样本量从31到2410不等。三项随机对照试验的短期死亡率风险比无统计学意义,两项随机对照试验的ICU住院时间平均差分别为-2.91天和-1.00天(95%置信区间[CI],-5.53至-0.29和-1.68至-0.32)。尽管一项随机对照试验中与肠道相关并发症的风险比为3.82(95%CI,1.43至10.19),表明早期肠内营养组的风险显著高于对照组,但五项研究中报告的肠内营养与肠道相关并发症的结果尚无定论。这项系统评价未发现早期肠内营养对脓毒症患者死亡率有显著益处。然而,由于现有研究中定义不一致、异质性、偏倚风险和方法学不佳,证据不足。