Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Dec;38(23-24):11954-11979. doi: 10.1177/08862605231190346. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
Contraceptive sabotage and other forms of intimate partner violence (IPV) can interfere with contraceptive use. We used 2012 to 2015 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data from 8,981 people residing in five states who reported that when they became pregnant, they were not trying to get pregnant. We assessed the relationships between ever experiencing contraceptive sabotage and physical IPV 12 months before pregnancy (both by the current partner) and contraceptive use at the time of pregnancy using multivariable logistic regression. We also assessed the joint associations between physical IPV 12 months before pregnancy and ever experienced contraceptive sabotage with contraceptive use at the time of pregnancy. Few people ever experienced contraceptive sabotage (1.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4, 2.3) or physical IPV 12 months before pregnancy (2.8%; 95% CI: 2.3, 3.3). In models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, marital status, education, and state of residence, ever experiencing contraceptive sabotage was associated with contraceptive use at the time of pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.06, 2.82), but not with physical IPV 12 months before pregnancy (aOR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.46, 1.02). When examining the joint association, compared to not ever experiencing contraceptive sabotage or physical IPV 12 months before pregnancy, ever experiencing contraceptive sabotage was significantly related to contraceptive use at the time of pregnancy (aOR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.00, 2.95). However, it was not associated with experiencing physical IPV 12 months before pregnancy (aOR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.04) or with experiencing both contraceptive sabotage and physical IPV 12 months before pregnancy (aOR: 1.21; 95% CI: 0.42, 3.50), compared to not ever experiencing contraceptive sabotage or physical IPV 12 months before pregnancy. Our study highlights that current partner contraceptive sabotage may motivate those not trying to get pregnant to use contraception; however, all people in our sample still experienced a pregnancy.
避孕措施破坏和其他形式的亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)可能会干扰避孕措施的使用。我们使用了来自五个州的 8981 名报告在怀孕时未尝试怀孕的人的 2012 年至 2015 年妊娠风险评估监测系统数据。我们使用多变量逻辑回归评估了在怀孕前 12 个月经历过避孕措施破坏(由当前伴侣)和怀孕时使用避孕措施与身体 IPV 之间的关系。我们还评估了在怀孕前 12 个月经历身体 IPV 和曾经经历过避孕措施破坏与怀孕时使用避孕措施之间的联合关联。很少有人曾经经历过避孕措施破坏(1.8%;95%置信区间[CI]:1.4,2.3)或在怀孕前 12 个月经历过身体 IPV(2.8%;95%CI:2.3,3.3)。在调整年龄、种族/民族、婚姻状况、教育程度和居住州的模型中,曾经经历过避孕措施破坏与怀孕时使用避孕措施有关(调整后的优势比[aOR]:1.73;95%CI:1.06,2.82),但与怀孕前 12 个月的身体 IPV 无关(aOR:0.69;95%CI:0.46,1.02)。当检查联合关联时,与从未经历过避孕措施破坏或怀孕前 12 个月的身体 IPV 相比,曾经历过避孕措施破坏与怀孕时使用避孕措施显著相关(aOR:1.72;95%CI:1.00,2.95)。然而,它与怀孕前 12 个月的身体 IPV 无关(aOR:0.68;95%CI:0.45,1.04),也与怀孕前 12 个月同时经历避孕措施破坏和身体 IPV 无关(aOR:1.21;95%CI:0.42,3.50),与从未经历过避孕措施破坏或怀孕前 12 个月的身体 IPV 相比。我们的研究强调,当前伴侣的避孕措施破坏可能会促使那些不想怀孕的人使用避孕措施;然而,我们样本中的所有人仍经历了怀孕。