• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Types of Lifetime Reproductive Coercion and Current Contraceptive Use.终身生殖强迫的类型和当前避孕措施的使用。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Aug;30(8):1078-1085. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8784. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
2
Associations of intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion with contraceptive use in Uttar Pradesh, India: How associations differ across contraceptive methods.印度北方邦亲密伴侣暴力和生殖控制与避孕使用的关联:不同避孕方法关联的差异。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 16;15(10):e0241008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241008. eCollection 2020.
3
Intersection of reproductive coercion and intimate partner violence: cross-sectional influences on women's contraceptive use in Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire and Kenya.生育胁迫与亲密伴侣暴力的交叉:布基纳法索、科特迪瓦和肯尼亚对女性避孕使用的横断面影响。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 10;13(5):e065697. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065697.
4
Reproductive Coercion by Male Sexual Partners: Associations With Partner Violence and College Women's Sexual Health.男性性伴侣的生殖胁迫:与伴侣暴力及大学女性性健康的关联
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Nov;32(21):3301-3320. doi: 10.1177/0886260515597441. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
5
Contraceptive Use Among Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence and Reproductive Coercion: The Moderating Role of PTSD and Depression.遭受亲密伴侣暴力和生殖胁迫的女性的避孕措施使用:创伤后应激障碍和抑郁的调节作用。
Violence Against Women. 2024 Jul;30(9):2075-2095. doi: 10.1177/10778012231153372. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
6
Men's reproductive coercion of women: prevalence, experiences, and coping strategies-a mixed method study in urban health facilities in León, Nicaragua.男性对女性的生殖胁迫:在尼加拉瓜莱昂市的城市卫生机构中进行的一项混合方法研究,其流行率、经历和应对策略。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Aug 23;21(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01441-y.
7
Male partner reproductive coercion among women veterans.男性伴侣对退伍女军人的生殖胁迫。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2):239.e1-239.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.015. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
8
Reproductive Coercion, Intimate Partner Violence, and Unintended Pregnancy Among Latina Women.生育胁迫、亲密伴侣暴力与拉美裔女性意外怀孕。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Feb;37(3-4):1604-1636. doi: 10.1177/0886260520922363. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
9
Understanding the Link Between Reproductive Coercion and Covert Use of Contraception as a Safety Strategy for Women Experiencing Violence in Nairobi's Urban Informal Settlements.理解生殖胁迫与秘密使用避孕措施之间的联系,这是内罗毕城市非正规住区遭受暴力的妇女采取的一种安全策略。
Violence Against Women. 2023 May;29(6-7):1343-1367. doi: 10.1177/10778012221108422. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
10
Effects of a clinic-based reproductive empowerment intervention on proximal outcomes of contraceptive use, self-efficacy, attitudes, and awareness and use of survivor services: a cluster-controlled trial in Nairobi, Kenya.以诊所为基础的生殖权利赋权干预对避孕使用的近期结局、自我效能、态度以及对幸存者服务的认识和使用的影响:肯尼亚内罗毕的一项群组对照试验。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2227371. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2227371.

引用本文的文献

1
Pregnancy, Birth, and Mental Health Outcomes Associated With Recent Reproductive Coercion and Intimate Partner Violence in a Crowd-Sourced National Sample.在一个众包的全国样本中,与近期生殖胁迫和亲密伴侣暴力相关的妊娠、分娩及心理健康结局
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2025 May 19. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13758.
2
Longitudinal impact of past-year reproductive coercion on contraceptive use dynamics in Sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from eight population-based cohorts.过去一年生殖胁迫对撒哈拉以南非洲地区避孕使用动态的纵向影响:来自八个基于人群的队列研究的证据
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jan 10;80:103056. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103056. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Hidden in plain sight: A systematic review of coercion and Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive methods (LARC).显而易见却又被忽视:对强制手段与长效可逆避孕方法(LARC)的系统评价
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Aug 18;3(8):e0002131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002131. eCollection 2023.
4
Contraceptive Sabotage and Contraceptive Use at the Time of Pregnancy: An Analysis of People with a Recent Live Birth in the United States.避孕手段破坏与孕期避孕措施使用:对近期分娩的美国人群的分析。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Dec;38(23-24):11954-11979. doi: 10.1177/08862605231190346. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
5
Recent Intimate Partner Violence and Oral Contraceptive Pill Adherence in a Cohort of Reproductive-Aged Women.近期亲密伴侣暴力与育龄期女性口服避孕药依从性的队列研究。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Dec;31(12):1703-1709. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0622. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
6
Coerced Choice: Resigned Contraceptive Usership Among Individuals Affected by Reproductive Coercion.被迫的选择:受生殖强迫影响的个体中的无奈避孕使用。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2022 Sep;67(5):593-597. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13396. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
7
Caring for Mothers: A Narrative Review on Interpersonal Violence and Peripartum Mental Health.关爱母亲:人际暴力与围产期心理健康的叙事综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 16;18(10):5281. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105281.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of Intimate Partner Reproductive Coercion in the United States: Racial and Ethnic Differences.美国亲密伴侣生殖强迫的流行率:种族和民族差异。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Nov;36(21-22):NP12324-NP12341. doi: 10.1177/0886260519888205. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
2
Intimate Partner Violence and Effectiveness Level of Contraceptive Selection Post-Abortion.流产后亲密伴侣暴力与避孕方法选择效果水平。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Aug;29(8):1142-1149. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7612. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
3
Effectiveness of Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Pregnancy Prevention: A Systematic Review.基于生育意识的方法预防怀孕的有效性:系统评价。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;132(3):591-604. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002784.
4
The effects of preabortion depressive symptoms on postabortion contraceptive effectiveness level chosen among women seeking abortions.流产前抑郁症状对寻求流产的女性所选择的流产后避孕效果水平的影响。
Contraception. 2018 Apr;97(4):335-340. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.12.013. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
5
Contraceptive Failure in the United States: Estimates from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth.美国的避孕失败情况:来自2006 - 2010年全国家庭成长调查的估计数据
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Mar;49(1):7-16. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12017. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
6
Psychometric properties and refinement of the Reproductive Coercion Scale.生殖胁迫量表的心理测量特性及优化
Contraception. 2017 Mar;95(3):292-298. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
7
Reproductive Coercion: A Systematic Review.生殖胁迫:系统评价。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2018 Oct;19(4):371-390. doi: 10.1177/1524838016663935. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
8
Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008-2011.2008 - 2011年美国意外怀孕率下降情况
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 3;374(9):843-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1506575.
9
A family planning clinic-based intervention to address reproductive coercion: a cluster randomized controlled trial.一项基于计划生育诊所的干预措施以应对生殖胁迫:一项整群随机对照试验。
Contraception. 2016 Jul;94(1):58-67. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
10
Current Contraceptive Use and Variation by Selected Characteristics Among Women Aged 15-44: United States, 2011-2013.2011 - 2013年美国15 - 44岁女性当前的避孕措施使用情况及按选定特征划分的差异
Natl Health Stat Report. 2015 Nov 10(86):1-14.

终身生殖强迫的类型和当前避孕措施的使用。

Types of Lifetime Reproductive Coercion and Current Contraceptive Use.

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Aug;30(8):1078-1085. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8784. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1089/jwh.2020.8784
PMID:33404346
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8403199/
Abstract

Intimate partner violence and differential power dynamics are associated with contraceptive behaviors. This study examines the role of reproductive coercion (RC) by an intimate partner in women's decisions about contraceptive use. A self-report survey was administered to a probability sample of a diverse group of women of reproductive age in Delaware's Title X health care facilities. Currently used contraceptive methods were categorized into three effectiveness levels based on typical use failure rates: no method or low effectiveness (>10% failure), moderate effectiveness (>1% and <10% failure), and high effectiveness (<1% failure). The short-form RC scale was used to categorize RC experiences: no RC, verbal only, or behavioral. We conducted multinomial logistic regression to examine the association between types of RC and effectiveness level of current contraceptive method, taking our sampling design into account and adjusting for covariates. Among 240 women (weighted  = 6529) included in the sample, 13.9% reported experiencing only verbal RC, and 16.1% reported behavioral RC. Women who reported behavioral RC were more likely to currently be using highly versus moderately (adjusted relative risk ratio [aRRR]: 26.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.59-156.0) and low effective methods (aRRR: 3.08, 95% CI: 0.97-9.82), but less likely to be using moderately (aRRR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02-0.77) than low effective methods. Using highly and low effective methods may indicate two opposing ways of managing behavioral RC experiences: controlling fertility by choosing less detectable but highly effective methods or feeling disempowered and using no or low effective partner-dependent methods.

摘要

亲密伴侣暴力和权力差异与避孕行为有关。本研究探讨了亲密伴侣实施生殖控制(RC)对女性避孕决策的影响。通过概率抽样方法,在特拉华州的计划生育医疗设施中对不同年龄段的育龄妇女进行了自我报告调查。根据典型使用失败率,将当前使用的避孕方法分为三个有效水平:无方法或低效果(>10%失败)、中效(>1%且<10%失败)和高效(<1%失败)。采用简短的 RC 量表来分类 RC 经历:无 RC、口头 RC 或行为 RC。考虑到我们的抽样设计并调整了协变量,我们采用多项逻辑回归来检验不同类型的 RC 与当前避孕方法有效水平之间的关联。在纳入的 240 名女性(加权后为 6529 人)中,13.9%报告仅经历口头 RC,16.1%报告经历行为 RC。报告行为 RC 的女性更有可能当前使用高效(调整后的相对风险比 [aRRR]:26.71,95%置信区间 [CI]:4.59-156.0)和中效(aRRR:26.71,95% CI:4.59-156.0)避孕方法,而不是低效避孕方法(aRRR:3.08,95% CI:0.97-9.82),但不太可能使用中效避孕方法(aRRR:0.12,95% CI:0.02-0.77)。使用高效和低效方法可能表明两种管理行为 RC 经验的相反方式:通过选择不易察觉但高效的方法来控制生育,或感到无能为力并使用无或低效果的伴侣依赖方法。