School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Aug;30(8):1078-1085. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8784. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
Intimate partner violence and differential power dynamics are associated with contraceptive behaviors. This study examines the role of reproductive coercion (RC) by an intimate partner in women's decisions about contraceptive use. A self-report survey was administered to a probability sample of a diverse group of women of reproductive age in Delaware's Title X health care facilities. Currently used contraceptive methods were categorized into three effectiveness levels based on typical use failure rates: no method or low effectiveness (>10% failure), moderate effectiveness (>1% and <10% failure), and high effectiveness (<1% failure). The short-form RC scale was used to categorize RC experiences: no RC, verbal only, or behavioral. We conducted multinomial logistic regression to examine the association between types of RC and effectiveness level of current contraceptive method, taking our sampling design into account and adjusting for covariates. Among 240 women (weighted = 6529) included in the sample, 13.9% reported experiencing only verbal RC, and 16.1% reported behavioral RC. Women who reported behavioral RC were more likely to currently be using highly versus moderately (adjusted relative risk ratio [aRRR]: 26.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.59-156.0) and low effective methods (aRRR: 3.08, 95% CI: 0.97-9.82), but less likely to be using moderately (aRRR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02-0.77) than low effective methods. Using highly and low effective methods may indicate two opposing ways of managing behavioral RC experiences: controlling fertility by choosing less detectable but highly effective methods or feeling disempowered and using no or low effective partner-dependent methods.
亲密伴侣暴力和权力差异与避孕行为有关。本研究探讨了亲密伴侣实施生殖控制(RC)对女性避孕决策的影响。通过概率抽样方法,在特拉华州的计划生育医疗设施中对不同年龄段的育龄妇女进行了自我报告调查。根据典型使用失败率,将当前使用的避孕方法分为三个有效水平:无方法或低效果(>10%失败)、中效(>1%且<10%失败)和高效(<1%失败)。采用简短的 RC 量表来分类 RC 经历:无 RC、口头 RC 或行为 RC。考虑到我们的抽样设计并调整了协变量,我们采用多项逻辑回归来检验不同类型的 RC 与当前避孕方法有效水平之间的关联。在纳入的 240 名女性(加权后为 6529 人)中,13.9%报告仅经历口头 RC,16.1%报告经历行为 RC。报告行为 RC 的女性更有可能当前使用高效(调整后的相对风险比 [aRRR]:26.71,95%置信区间 [CI]:4.59-156.0)和中效(aRRR:26.71,95% CI:4.59-156.0)避孕方法,而不是低效避孕方法(aRRR:3.08,95% CI:0.97-9.82),但不太可能使用中效避孕方法(aRRR:0.12,95% CI:0.02-0.77)。使用高效和低效方法可能表明两种管理行为 RC 经验的相反方式:通过选择不易察觉但高效的方法来控制生育,或感到无能为力并使用无或低效果的伴侣依赖方法。