Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany; Unit PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology, and -Economics (PTEE), Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Sep;332:116100. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116100. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
We aim to investigate to what extent gender inequality at the labor market explains higher depression risk for older US women compared to men. We analyze data from 35,699 US adults aged 50-80 years that participated in the Health and Retirement Study. The gender gap is calculated as the difference in prevalence in elevated depressive symptoms (score ≥ 3 on the 8-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale) between women and men. We employ a dynamic causal decomposition and simulate the life course of a synthetic cohort from ages 50-80 with the longitudinal g-formula and introduce four nested interventions by assigning women the same probabilities of A) being in an employment category, B) occupation class, C) current income and D) prior income group as men, conditional on women's health and family status until age 70. The gender gap in depression risk is 2.9%-points at ages 50-51 which increases to 7.6%-points at ages 70-71. Intervention A decreases the gender gap over ages 50-71 by 1.2%-points (95%CI for change: 2.81 to 0.4), intervention D by 1.64%-points (95%CI for change: 3.28 to -0.15) or 32% (95%CI: 1.39 to 62.83), and the effects of interventions B and C are in between those of A and D. The impact is particularly large for Hispanics and low educated groups. Gender inequalities at the labor market substantially explain the gender gap in depression risk in older US adults. Reducing these inequalities has the potential to narrow the gender gap in depression.
我们旨在探究劳动力市场性别不平等在多大程度上解释了美国老年女性的抑郁风险高于男性。我们分析了 35699 名年龄在 50-80 岁的美国成年人参与的健康与退休研究的数据。性别差距是通过女性和男性之间(中心流行病学研究抑郁量表的 8 项得分≥3)升高的抑郁症状患病率差异来计算的。我们采用动态因果分解,并使用纵向 g 公式模拟一个综合队列的生命周期,从 50 岁到 80 岁,并通过将女性的以下概率与男性相同来引入四项嵌套干预措施:A)处于就业类别、B)职业类别、C)当前收入和 D)以前的收入群体,前提是女性的健康和家庭状况在 70 岁之前一直保持不变。50-51 岁时,抑郁风险的性别差距为 2.9%,70-71 岁时增加到 7.6%。干预 A 可使 50-71 岁之间的性别差距缩小 1.2%(95%CI 变化范围:2.81 至 0.4),干预 D 缩小 1.64%(95%CI 变化范围:3.28 至 -0.15)或 32%(95%CI:1.39 至 62.83),而干预 B 和 C 的效果介于 A 和 D 之间。这些影响在西班牙裔和受教育程度较低的群体中尤为显著。劳动力市场的性别不平等极大地解释了美国老年成年人中抑郁风险的性别差距。减少这些不平等有潜力缩小抑郁的性别差距。