• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伦理、法律和社会影响(ELSI)以及设计一项随机对照试验以测试美国黑人女性癌症遗传研究结果在线返还的挑战。

Ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) and challenges in the design of a randomized controlled trial to test the online return of cancer genetic research results to U.S. Black women.

机构信息

Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Boston, MA 02118, USA.

Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, 72 East Concord St, L-7, Boston, MA 02118, USA.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Sep;132:107309. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107309. Epub 2023 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2023.107309
PMID:37516165
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10544717/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A central challenge to precision medicine research efforts is the return of genetic research results in a manner that is effective, ethical, and efficient. Formal tests of alternate modalities are needed, particularly for racially marginalized populations that have historically been underserved in this context.

METHODS

We are conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test scalable modalities for results return and to examine the clinical utility of returning genetic research results to a research cohort of Black women. The primary aim is to compare the efficacy of two communication modalities for results return: 1) a conventional modality that entails telephone disclosure by a Board-certified genetic counselor, and 2) an online self-guided modality that entails results return directly to participants, with optional genetic counselor follow-up via telephone. The trial is being conducted among participants in the Black Women's Health Study (BWHS), where targeted sequencing of 4000 participants was previously completed.

RESULTS

Several ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) and challenges presented, which necessitated substantial revision of the original study protocol. Challenges included chain of custody, re-testing of research results in a CLIA lab, exclusion of VUS results, and digital literacy. Bioethical principles of autonomy, justice, non-maleficence, and beneficence were considered in the design of the study protocol.

CONCLUSION

This study is uniquely situated to provide critical evidence on the effectiveness of alternative models for genetic results return and provide further insight into the factors influencing access and uptake of genetic information among U.S. Black women.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov: NCT04407611.

摘要

背景

精准医学研究的一个核心挑战是有效地、合乎道德地和高效地返回遗传研究结果。需要对替代模式进行正式测试,特别是对于在这种情况下历史上服务不足的种族边缘化人群。

方法

我们正在进行一项随机对照试验(RCT),以测试可扩展的结果返回模式,并研究将遗传研究结果返回给黑人女性研究队列的临床实用性。主要目的是比较两种结果返回沟通模式的效果:1)传统模式,即由董事会认证的遗传咨询师进行电话披露,2)在线自我指导模式,即直接将结果返回给参与者,并可通过电话选择遗传咨询师进行跟进。该试验正在参加黑人妇女健康研究(BWHS)的参与者中进行,此前已经对 4000 名参与者进行了靶向测序。

结果

出现了一些伦理、法律和社会影响(ELSI)和挑战,这需要对原始研究方案进行大量修改。挑战包括监管链、在 CLIA 实验室重新测试研究结果、排除 VUS 结果以及数字素养。在研究方案的设计中考虑了自主、公正、不伤害和受益的生物伦理原则。

结论

这项研究的独特之处在于,它可以提供有关遗传结果返回替代模式有效性的关键证据,并进一步深入了解影响美国黑人妇女获取和接受遗传信息的因素。

临床试验

gov:NCT04407611。

相似文献

1
Ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) and challenges in the design of a randomized controlled trial to test the online return of cancer genetic research results to U.S. Black women.伦理、法律和社会影响(ELSI)以及设计一项随机对照试验以测试美国黑人女性癌症遗传研究结果在线返还的挑战。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Sep;132:107309. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107309. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
2
MAGENTA (Making Genetic testing accessible): a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing online genetic education and telephone genetic counseling for hereditary cancer genetic testing.MAGENTA(使基因检测普及化):一项前瞻性随机对照试验,比较在线遗传教育和电话遗传咨询对遗传性癌症基因检测的影响。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jul 2;19(1):648. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5868-x.
3
Evaluation of mailed results versus telephone disclosure of normal cancer genetic test results in a low-risk underserved population.邮寄结果评估与电话披露在低风险服务不足人群中正常癌症遗传检测结果的比较。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Jun 27;14(7):377-385. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad084.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Web Platform vs In-Person Genetic Counselor for Return of Carrier Results From Exome Sequencing: A Randomized Clinical Trial.网页平台与现场遗传咨询师在传递外显子组测序携带者结果方面的比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Mar 1;178(3):338-346. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8049.
6
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性基因检测
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
7
The NYCKidSeq project: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial incorporating genomics into the clinical care of diverse New York City children.NYCKidSeq 项目:将基因组学纳入多样化纽约市儿童临床护理中的随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Jan 14;22(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04953-4.
8
Implementation and outcomes of telephone disclosure of clinical BRCA1/2 test results.临床BRCA1/2检测结果电话告知的实施情况与结果
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Dec;93(3):413-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
9
Facilitating return of actionable genetic research results from a biobank repository: Participant uptake and utilization of digital interventions.促进生物库存储库中可操作的遗传研究结果的返还:参与者对数字干预措施的接受和利用。
HGG Adv. 2024 Oct 10;5(4):100346. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2024.100346. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
10
IMProving care After inherited Cancer Testing (IMPACT) study: protocol of a randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of two interventions designed to improve cancer risk management and family communication of genetic test results.遗传性癌症检测后改善照护(IMPACT)研究:一项随机试验的方案,评估两种干预措施在改善癌症风险管理和遗传检测结果的家族沟通方面的效果。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Oct 13;21(1):1099. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08822-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Gene-Environment Interaction Research.基因-环境相互作用研究的伦理、法律和社会影响
Genet Epidemiol. 2025 Jan;49(1):e22591. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22591. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

本文引用的文献

1
A Population-Based Study of Genes Previously Implicated in Breast Cancer.基于人群的先前与乳腺癌相关的基因研究。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):440-451. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2005936. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
2
Financial toxicity and strain among men receiving prostate cancer care in an equal access healthcare system.在一个公平获得医疗保健系统中接受前列腺癌治疗的男性中的经济毒性和压力。
Cancer Med. 2020 Dec;9(23):8765-8771. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3484. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
3
Patient reactions to receiving negative genomic screening results by mail.患者对通过邮件收到阴性基因组筛查结果的反应。
Genet Med. 2020 Dec;22(12):1994-2002. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0906-2. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
4
A Web-Based Tool to Automate Portions of Pretest Genetic Counseling for Inherited Cancer.一个基于网络的工具,用于自动化遗传性癌症先证者遗传咨询的部分内容。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Jul;18(7):841-847. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7546.
5
Contribution of Germline Predisposition Gene Mutations to Breast Cancer Risk in African American Women.胚系易感性基因突变对非裔美国女性乳腺癌风险的贡献。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Dec 14;112(12):1213-1221. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa040.
6
Returning Individual Genetic Research Results to Research Participants: Uptake and Outcomes Among Patients With Breast Cancer.向研究参与者反馈个体基因研究结果:乳腺癌患者的接受情况及结果
JCO Precis Oncol. 2018;2. doi: 10.1200/po.17.00250. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
7
Psychometric properties and clinical utility of brief measures of depression, anxiety, and general distress: The PHQ-2, GAD-2, and K-6.简短的抑郁、焦虑和一般困扰测量工具的心理测量特性和临床实用性:PHQ-2、GAD-2 和 K-6。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2019 Jan-Feb;56:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
8
Psychosocial impact of BRCA testing in young Black breast cancer survivors.BRCA 检测对年轻黑人乳腺癌幸存者的心理社会影响。
Psychooncology. 2018 Dec;27(12):2778-2785. doi: 10.1002/pon.4887. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
9
Approaches to carrier testing and results disclosure in translational genomics research: The clinical sequencing exploratory research consortium experience.转化基因组学研究中携带者检测及结果披露的方法:临床测序探索性研究联盟的经验
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2018 Nov;6(6):898-909. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.453. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
10
Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative: a prospective study of the utility of personalized medicine.科里尔个性化医疗协作组:一项关于个性化医疗效用的前瞻性研究。
Per Med. 2010 May;7(3):301-317. doi: 10.2217/pme.10.13.