• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

网页平台与现场遗传咨询师在传递外显子组测序携带者结果方面的比较:一项随机临床试验。

Web Platform vs In-Person Genetic Counselor for Return of Carrier Results From Exome Sequencing: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Medical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Mar 1;178(3):338-346. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8049.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8049
PMID:29356820
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5885925/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

A critical bottleneck in clinical genomics is the mismatch between large volumes of results and the availability of knowledgeable professionals to return them.

OBJECTIVE

To test whether a web-based platform is noninferior to a genetic counselor for educating patients about their carrier results from exome sequencing.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized noninferiority trial conducted in a longitudinal sequencing cohort at the National Institutes of Health from February 5, 2014, to December 16, 2016, was used to compare the web-based platform with a genetic counselor. Among the 571 eligible participants, 1 to 7 heterozygous variants were identified in genes that cause a phenotype that is recessively inherited. Surveys were administered after cohort enrollment, immediately following trial education, and 1 month and 6 months later to primarily healthy postreproductive participants who expressed interest in learning their carrier results. Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were applied.

INTERVENTIONS

A web-based platform that integrated education on carrier results with personal test results was designed to directly parallel disclosure education by a genetic counselor. The sessions took a mean (SD) time of 21 (10.6), and 27 (9.3) minutes, respectively.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes and noninferiority margins (δNI) were knowledge (0 to 8, δNI = -1), test-specific distress (0 to 30, δNI = +1), and decisional conflict (15 to 75, δNI = +6).

RESULTS

After 462 participants (80.9%) provided consent and were randomized, all but 3 participants (n = 459) completed surveys following education and counseling; 398 (86.1%) completed 1-month surveys and 392 (84.8%) completed 6-month surveys. Participants were predominantly well-educated, non-Hispanic white, married parents; mean (SD) age was 63 (63.1) years and 246 (53.6%) were men. The web platform was noninferior to the genetic counselor on outcomes assessed at 1 and 6 months: knowledge (mean group difference, -0.18; lower limit of 97.5% CI, -0.63; δNI = -1), test-specific distress (median group difference, 0; upper limit of 97.5% CI, 0; δNI = +1), and decisional conflict about choosing to learn results (mean group difference, 1.18; upper limit of 97.5% CI, 2.66; δNI = +6). There were no significant differences between the genetic counselors and web-based platform detected between modes of education delivery in disclosure rates to spouses (151 vs 159; relative risk [RR], 1.04; 95% CI, 0.64-1.69; P > .99), children (103 vs 117; RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.85-1.36; P = .59), or siblings (91 vs 78; RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.94-1.46; P = .18).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This trial demonstrates noninferiority of web-based return of carrier results among postreproductive, mostly healthy adults. Replication studies among younger and more diverse populations are needed to establish generalizability. Yet return of results via a web-based platform may be sufficient for subsets of test results, reserving genetic counselors for return of results with a greater health threat.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00410241.

摘要

重要性

临床基因组学的一个关键瓶颈是大量结果与能够解读这些结果的专业知识人员之间的不匹配。

目的

测试基于网络的平台在向接受外显子组测序的患者传递携带者结果方面是否不劣于遗传咨询师。

设计、设置和参与者:这是一项在国立卫生研究院的纵向测序队列中进行的随机非劣效性试验,从 2014 年 2 月 5 日至 2016 年 12 月 16 日进行,旨在比较基于网络的平台与遗传咨询师。在 571 名符合条件的参与者中,1 至 7 个杂合变体在导致隐性遗传表型的基因中被识别。在队列入组后、试验教育后以及 1 个月和 6 个月后,对主要是有生育能力的、表示有兴趣了解自己携带者结果的、已绝经的参与者进行了调查。主要采用意向治疗和符合方案分析。

干预措施

一个集成了携带者结果教育和个人检测结果的基于网络的平台被设计用来直接与遗传咨询师的披露教育相平行。这些课程分别需要平均(SD)21(10.6)和 27(9.3)分钟。

主要结果和非劣效性边界(δNI):主要结局和非劣效性边界(δNI)是知识(0 到 8,δNI=−1)、特定测试的困扰(0 到 30,δNI=+1)和决策冲突(15 到 75,δNI=+6)。

结果

在 462 名(80.9%)提供同意并随机分组的参与者中,除了 3 名(n=459)参与者在接受教育和咨询后完成了调查外,其余所有参与者均完成了调查;398 名(86.1%)参与者完成了 1 个月的调查,392 名(84.8%)参与者完成了 6 个月的调查。参与者主要是受过良好教育的、非西班牙裔白人、已婚的父母;平均(SD)年龄为 63(63.1)岁,246 名(53.6%)是男性。在 1 个月和 6 个月的评估中,网络平台与遗传咨询师相比是非劣效的:知识(平均组差异,−0.18;97.5%CI 的下限,−0.63;δNI=−1)、特定测试的困扰(中位数组差异,0;97.5%CI 的上限,0;δNI=+1)以及选择了解结果的决策冲突(平均组差异,1.18;97.5%CI 的上限,2.66;δNI=+6)。在披露率方面,遗传咨询师和网络平台之间没有检测到显著差异,向配偶(151 对 159;相对风险[RR],1.04;95%CI,0.64-1.69;P>.99)、子女(103 对 117;RR,1.07;95%CI,0.85-1.36;P=0.59)或兄弟姐妹(91 对 78;RR,1.17;95%CI,0.94-1.46;P=0.18)。

结论和相关性

这项试验表明,在已绝经、主要是健康的成年人中,基于网络的携带者结果传递是非劣效的。需要在更年轻和更多样化的人群中进行复制研究,以确立其普遍性。然而,通过基于网络的平台传递结果可能足以满足某些检测结果的需求,将遗传咨询师保留用于具有更大健康威胁的结果传递。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00410241。

相似文献

1
Web Platform vs In-Person Genetic Counselor for Return of Carrier Results From Exome Sequencing: A Randomized Clinical Trial.网页平台与现场遗传咨询师在传递外显子组测序携带者结果方面的比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Mar 1;178(3):338-346. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8049.
2
Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial.基于计算机的决策辅助工具对乳腺癌易感性基因检测的知识、认知及意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2004 Jul 28;292(4):442-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.4.442.
3
Remotely Delivered Cancer Genetic Testing in the Making Genetic Testing Accessible (MAGENTA) Trial: A Randomized Clinical Trial.远程提供癌症基因检测以实现基因检测的可及性(MAGENTA)试验:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Nov 1;9(11):1547-1555. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.3748.
4
MAGENTA (Making Genetic testing accessible): a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing online genetic education and telephone genetic counseling for hereditary cancer genetic testing.MAGENTA(使基因检测普及化):一项前瞻性随机对照试验,比较在线遗传教育和电话遗传咨询对遗传性癌症基因检测的影响。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jul 2;19(1):648. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5868-x.
5
Effects of Counseling by Peer Human Advisors vs Computers to Increase Walking in Underserved Populations: The COMPASS Randomized Clinical Trial.同伴人类顾问与计算机咨询对服务不足人群增加步行的影响:COMPASS 随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Nov 1;180(11):1481-1490. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4143.
6
Perceptions of uncertainties about carrier results identified by exome sequencing in a randomized controlled trial.在一项随机对照试验中,对通过外显子组测序确定的携带者结果不确定性的认知。
Transl Behav Med. 2020 May 20;10(2):441-450. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz111.
7
TARGET: A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial of a Pretest, Patient-Driven Genetic Education Webtool Versus Genetic Counseling for Prostate Cancer Germline Testing.标题:一种预测试、患者驱动的基因教育网络工具与遗传咨询在前列腺癌种系检测中的非劣效性随机对照试验
JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 Mar;8:e2300552. doi: 10.1200/PO.23.00552.
8
Patient and genetic counselor perceptions of in-person versus telephone genetic counseling for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.患者及遗传咨询师对遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌面对面与电话遗传咨询的看法。
Fam Cancer. 2016 Oct;15(4):529-39. doi: 10.1007/s10689-016-9900-x.
9
Use of an educational computer program before genetic counseling for breast cancer susceptibility: effects on duration and content of counseling sessions.在进行乳腺癌易感性遗传咨询前使用教育性计算机程序:对咨询 session 的时长和内容的影响 。(注:这里“session”结合语境可理解为咨询环节、咨询时段等,但直接保留英文更准确传达原文意思,因为中文里没有完全对应的简洁词汇)
Genet Med. 2005 Apr;7(4):221-9. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000159905.13125.86.
10
Randomized noninferiority trial of telephone versus in-person genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.电话咨询与面对面咨询在遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌中的随机非劣效性试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 1;32(7):618-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.3226. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
An eHealth Delivery Alternative for Cancer Genetic Testing for Hereditary Predisposition in Patients With Metastatic Cancers: Protocol for a Randomized Trial.转移性癌症患者遗传性易感性癌症基因检测的电子健康交付替代方案:一项随机试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 25;14:e72515. doi: 10.2196/72515.
2
Evaluation of the digital genetic assistant in technology assisted genetic counseling for genetic carrier screening.数字遗传助手在技术辅助遗传咨询进行携带者筛查中的评估。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Mar 29;8(1):183. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01573-7.
3
Genetics Navigator: protocol for a mixed methods randomized controlled trial evaluating a digital platform to deliver genomic services in Canadian pediatric and adult populations.遗传导航员:一项混合方法随机对照试验的方案,旨在评估一个数字平台在加拿大儿科和成人人群中提供基因组服务的效果。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 3;14(9):e090084. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090084.
4
Development and utility of a clinical research informatics application for participant recruitment and workflow management for a return of results pilot trial in familial hypercholesterolemia in the Million Veteran Program.百万退伍军人计划中家族性高胆固醇血症结果返还试点试验的临床研究信息学应用程序的开发及其在参与者招募和工作流程管理中的效用。
JAMIA Open. 2024 Mar 8;7(1):ooae020. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae020. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Evaluation of mailed results versus telephone disclosure of normal cancer genetic test results in a low-risk underserved population.邮寄结果评估与电话披露在低风险服务不足人群中正常癌症遗传检测结果的比较。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Jun 27;14(7):377-385. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad084.
6
Acceptability and Usability of the Family Gene Toolkit for Swiss and Korean Families Harboring Pathogenic Variants: A Web-Based Platform for Cascade Genetic Testing.瑞士和韩国携带致病性变异的家庭使用家庭基因工具包的可接受性和可用性:一个用于级联基因检测的基于网络的平台
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 9;15(18):4485. doi: 10.3390/cancers15184485.
7
Uptake of Genetic Research Results and Patient-Reported Outcomes With Return of Results Incorporating Web-Based Predisclosure Education.纳入基于网络的结果披露前教育的遗传研究结果和患者报告结局的接受情况与结果回报。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov 1;41(31):4905-4915. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00516. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
8
Ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) and challenges in the design of a randomized controlled trial to test the online return of cancer genetic research results to U.S. Black women.伦理、法律和社会影响(ELSI)以及设计一项随机对照试验以测试美国黑人女性癌症遗传研究结果在线返还的挑战。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Sep;132:107309. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107309. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
9
Patient decision support resources inform decisions about cancer susceptibility genetic testing and risk management: a systematic review of patient impact and experience.患者决策支持资源为癌症易感性基因检测和风险管理决策提供信息:对患者影响和体验的系统评价
Front Health Serv. 2023 May 31;3:1092816. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1092816. eCollection 2023.
10
Digital interventions for genomics and genetics education, empowerment, and service engagement: A systematic review.用于基因组学和遗传学教育、赋权及服务参与的数字干预措施:一项系统综述。
J Community Genet. 2023 Jun;14(3):227-240. doi: 10.1007/s12687-023-00648-w. Epub 2023 May 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Projecting the Supply and Demand for Certified Genetic Counselors: a Workforce Study.预测认证遗传咨询师的供需情况:一项劳动力研究。
J Genet Couns. 2018 Feb;27(1):16-20. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0158-8. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
2
The Human Gene Mutation Database: towards a comprehensive repository of inherited mutation data for medical research, genetic diagnosis and next-generation sequencing studies.人类基因突变数据库:致力于打造一个全面的遗传性突变数据仓库,服务于医学研究、基因诊断及新一代测序研究。
Hum Genet. 2017 Jun;136(6):665-677. doi: 10.1007/s00439-017-1779-6. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
3
A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials to Assess Outcomes of Genetic Counseling.一项评估遗传咨询结果的随机对照试验的系统评价
J Genet Couns. 2017 Oct;26(5):902-933. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0082-y. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
4
Standards for the Reporting of Genetic Counseling Interventions in Research and Other Studies (GCIRS): an NSGC Task Force Report.研究及其他研究中遗传咨询干预报告标准(GCIRS):NSGC特别工作组报告
J Genet Couns. 2017 Jun;26(3):355-360. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0076-9. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
5
Response to A Different Vantage Point Commentary: Psychotherapeutic Genetic Counseling, Is it?对《另一个有利视角评论:心理治疗性遗传咨询,是吗?》的回应
J Genet Couns. 2017 Apr;26(2):334-336. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-0025-z. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
6
Characterizing Participants in the ClinSeq Genome Sequencing Cohort as Early Adopters of a New Health Technology.将ClinSeq基因组测序队列中的参与者表征为一种新健康技术的早期采用者。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 17;10(7):e0132690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132690. eCollection 2015.
7
Follow-up effects of a tailored pre-counseling website with question prompt in breast cancer genetic counseling.乳腺癌遗传咨询中带有问题提示的定制化咨询前网站的随访效果
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jan;98(1):69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
8
Impact of delivery models on understanding genomic risk for type 2 diabetes.分娩模式对理解2型糖尿病基因组风险的影响。
Public Health Genomics. 2014;17(2):95-104. doi: 10.1159/000358413. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
9
Randomized noninferiority trial of telephone versus in-person genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.电话咨询与面对面咨询在遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌中的随机非劣效性试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 1;32(7):618-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.3226. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
10
Interpreting secondary cardiac disease variants in an exome cohort.解读外显子组队列中的继发性心脏病变异
Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2013 Aug;6(4):337-46. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.113.000039. Epub 2013 Jul 16.