Abdelbaser Ibrahim, Abourezk Ahmed Refaat, Magdy Mohamed, Elnegerey Naglaa, Sabry Ramy, Tharwat Mohamed, Sayedalahl Mohamed
Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2023 Oct;37(10):2012-2019. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.07.006. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
The choice of oral or nasal endotracheal intubation in children undergoing cardiac surgery is affected by several factors. This study compared the outcomes of oral versus nasal intubation in neonates and infants who underwent open cardiac surgery.
A randomized, controlled, open-labeled study.
At a university hospital.
A total of 220 infants and neonates who underwent cardiac surgery.
Patients were allocated randomly to oral or nasal intubation.
The primary outcome measure was postoperative fentanyl consumption (µg/kg/h) by intubated patients. Secondary outcome measures were the increase in heart rate (HR) from baseline during intubation, the time consumed for intubation, accidental intraoperative extubation, the occurrence of epistaxis, time to extubation, the onset of full oral feeding, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay, and the incidence of postoperative complications (the need for reintubation, stridor, pneumonia, wound infection). The mean (SD) postoperative fentanyl consumption of intubated patients (the primary outcome) was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in the nasal intubation group (0.53 ± 0.48) µg/kg/h compared with the oral intubation group (0.82 ± 0.20) µg/kg/h. The median (IQR) time needed for the intubation (31.5, 27-35 v 16, 14.8-18 seconds) was significantly (p < 0.001) longer, and the mean (SD) increase in HR (beats/min) from baseline during intubation (18 ± 5 v 26 ± 7) was significantly (p < 0.001) lower in the nasal intubation group compared to the oral intubation group. The incidence of inadvertent intraoperative extubation was significantly (p = 0.029) higher in the oral (n = 6, 6.1%) than in the nasal (n = 0, 0%) intubation group. The median (IQR) time to extubation (14, 12.6-17.2 v 20.5, 16.4-25.4 hours) and the ICU length of stay (27, 26-28 v 30, 28-34 hours) were significantly (p < 0.05) shorter in the nasal group compared to the oral group. The median (IQR) time to onset of full oral feeding was significantly (p = 0.031) shorter in the nasal intubation group (3, 1-6 days) compared to the oral intubation group (4, 2-7 days). There were no significant differences between the oral and nasal groups in the duration of hospital stay and the indices for reintubation, postintubation stridor, pneumonia, and surgical wound infection.
The nasal route for intubation is associated with less postoperative fentanyl consumption, earlier extubation, lower incidence of accidental extubation, and earlier full oral feeding than oral intubation. The nasal route is not associated with an increased risk of postoperative pneumonia or surgical wound infection.
心脏手术患儿选择经口还是经鼻气管插管受多种因素影响。本研究比较了接受心脏直视手术的新生儿和婴儿经口插管与经鼻插管的效果。
一项随机、对照、开放标签研究。
在一家大学医院。
共有220例接受心脏手术的婴儿和新生儿。
将患者随机分配至经口插管或经鼻插管。
主要结局指标是插管患者术后芬太尼消耗量(μg/kg/h)。次要结局指标包括插管期间心率(HR)较基线的增加幅度、插管耗时、术中意外拔管、鼻出血的发生情况、拔管时间、完全经口喂养开始时间、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和医院住院时间,以及术后并发症发生率(再次插管的需求、喘鸣、肺炎、伤口感染)。经鼻插管组插管患者术后芬太尼平均(标准差)消耗量(主要结局指标)显著低于经口插管组,分别为(0.53±0.48)μg/kg/h和(0.82±0.20)μg/kg/h(p<0.001)。经鼻插管组插管所需的中位(四分位间距)时间(31.5,27 - 35秒对16,14.8 - 18秒)显著更长(p<0.001),且插管期间HR较基线的平均(标准差)增加幅度(次/分钟)(18±5对26±7)显著更低(p<0.001)。术中意外拔管发生率在经口插管组(n = 6,6.1%)显著高于经鼻插管组(n = 0,0%)(p = 0.029)。经鼻插管组拔管中位(四分位间距)时间(14,12.6 - 17.2小时对20.5,16.4 - 25.4小时)和ICU住院时间(27,26 - 28小时对30,28 - 34小时)显著短于经口插管组(p<0.05)。经鼻插管组完全经口喂养开始的中位(四分位间距)时间(3,1 - 6天)显著短于经口插管组(4,2 - 7天)(p = 0.031)。经口插管组和经鼻插管组在住院时间以及再次插管、插管后喘鸣、肺炎和手术伤口感染指标方面无显著差异。
与经口插管相比,经鼻插管术后芬太尼消耗量更少、拔管更早、意外拔管发生率更低且完全经口喂养更早。经鼻插管与术后肺炎或手术伤口感染风险增加无关。