Holzapfel L, Chevret S, Madinier G, Ohen F, Demingeon G, Coupry A, Chaudet M
Département de Biostastique et d'Informatique Médicale, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France.
Crit Care Med. 1993 Aug;21(8):1132-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199308000-00010.
To compare the occurrence rate of nosocomial maxillary sinusitis and pneumonia in patients who have undergone nasotracheal vs. orotracheal intubation.
Randomized, clinical trial.
General adult intensive care unit (ICU) in a nonteaching public hospital.
A total of 300 (209 male, 91 female) patients were included. The mean age was 59 +/- 17 (SD) yrs. The simplified acute physiologic score was 14 +/- 6. Reasons for admission to the ICU were: coma (n = 78), pneumonia (n = 46), infection (n = 35), surgery (n = 34), multiple trauma (n = 20), head trauma (n = 12), other (n = 75). Among the 300 patients, 149 were randomized into the nasotracheal group and 151 into the orotracheal group. No statistical difference was found between initial characteristics of the two groups.
Patients were randomized between nasal and oral endotracheal intubation. Gastric intubation was performed via the same route as endotracheal intubation. Sinus computed tomography (CT) scans were performed every 7 days or earlier in case of fever and/or purulent nasal discharge. Criteria for nosocomial sinusitis were as follows: fever of > 38 degrees C, radiographic (sinusal air-fluid level or opacification on CT scan) signs and presence of purulent aspirate from the involved sinus puncture with 10(3) colony-forming units (cfu)/mL. Diagnosis of pneumonia was based on classical criteria and a protected brush specimen with 10(3) cfu/mL.
Radiographic evidence of sinusitis was observed in 78 patients, 45 from the nasal group and 33 from the oral group (p = .08, log-rank test). Among these patients, 54 fulfilled the sinusitis criteria stated above, 29 in the nasal group and 25 in the oral group (p = .75, log-rank test). Nosocomial pneumonia was observed in 26 patients, 17 in the nasal group and 9 in the oral group (p = .11, log-rank test). A multivariable analysis considering sinusitis as a time-dependent factor has suggested that sinusitis increased the risk of nosocomial pneumonia by a factor of 3.8. Nosocomial septicemia was observed in 33 patients, 22 episodes in the nasal group and 13 episodes in the oral group (p = .11, log-rank test). Overall mortality rate was 37% in the nasal group vs. 41% in the oral group (p = .37, log-rank test). Episodes of atelectasis and accidental extubations, and doses of sedative drugs and antibiotics were not different between the two groups. Length of mechanical ventilation did not differ between the two intubation groups. The mean length of stay in the ICU was 11 +/- 15 days in the nasal group vs. 9.5 +/- 11 days in the oral group (p = .27, Student's t-test).
In patients undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation, there was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence rate of nosocomial sinusitis or pneumonia between patients undergoing tracheal intubation via the nasal vs. oral route. A trend (p = 0.008) suggests less sinusitis in the orotracheal group.
比较经鼻气管插管与经口气管插管患者医院获得性上颌窦炎和肺炎的发生率。
随机临床试验。
一家非教学公立医院的普通成人重症监护病房(ICU)。
共纳入300例患者(男性209例,女性91例)。平均年龄为59±17(标准差)岁。简化急性生理学评分14±6。入住ICU的原因有:昏迷(n = 78)、肺炎(n = 46)、感染(n = 35)、手术(n = 34)、多发伤(n = 20)、头部外伤(n = 12)、其他(n = 75)。300例患者中,149例随机分为经鼻气管插管组,151例分为经口气管插管组。两组初始特征无统计学差异。
患者随机接受经鼻或经口气管插管。胃管插管与气管插管采用相同途径。每7天进行鼻窦计算机断层扫描(CT),若出现发热和/或脓性鼻分泌物则提前检查。医院获得性鼻窦炎的标准如下:体温>38℃、影像学表现(CT扫描显示鼻窦气液平面或混浊)以及从受累鼻窦穿刺抽出脓性分泌物且菌落形成单位(cfu)≥10³/mL。肺炎诊断依据经典标准及保护性毛刷标本菌落形成单位≥10³/mL。
78例患者有鼻窦炎影像学证据,经鼻组45例,经口组33例(p = 0.08,对数秩检验)。其中,54例患者符合上述鼻窦炎标准,经鼻组29例,经口组25例(p = 0.75,对数秩检验)。26例患者发生医院获得性肺炎,经鼻组17例,经口组9例(p = 0.11,对数秩检验)。将鼻窦炎作为时间依赖性因素的多变量分析表明,鼻窦炎使医院获得性肺炎风险增加3.8倍。33例患者发生医院获得性败血症,经鼻组22例,经口组13例(p = 0.11,对数秩检验)。经鼻组总死亡率为37%,经口组为41%(p = 0.37,对数秩检验)。两组肺不张和意外拔管发生率、镇静药物和抗生素使用剂量无差异。两组机械通气时间无差异。经鼻组在ICU的平均住院时间为11±15天,经口组为9.5±11天(p = 0.27,学生t检验)。
在接受长时间机械通气的患者中,经鼻气管插管与经口气管插管患者医院获得性鼻窦炎或肺炎的发生率无统计学显著差异。经口气管插管组鼻窦炎发生率有降低趋势(p = 0.008)。