Exercise Pathophysiology Laboratory, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Clinical Research Center, National Institute of Science and Technology for Health Technology Assessment (IATS) - CNPq/Brazil, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, Porto Alegre, RS, 2350, Brazil.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Jul 29;23(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03404-7.
Functional training may be an effective non-pharmacological therapy for heart failure (HF). This study aimed to compare the effects of functional training with strength training on peak VO and quality of life in individuals with HF.
A randomized, parallel-design and examiner-blinded controlled clinical trial with concealed allocation, intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. Twenty-seven participants with chronic HF were randomly allocated to functional or strength training group, to perform a 12-week physical training, three times per week, totalizing 36 sessions. Primary outcomes were the difference on peak VO and quality of life assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, respectively. Secondary outcomes included functionality assessed by the Duke Activity Status Index and gait speed test, peripheral and inspiratory muscular strength, assessed by hand grip and manovacuometry testing, respectively, endothelial function by brachial artery flow-mediated dilation, and lean body mass by arm muscle circumference.
Participants were aged 60 ± 7 years, with left ventricular ejection fraction 29 ± 8.5%. The functional and strength training groups showed the following results, respectively: peak VO increased by 1.4 ± 3.2 (16.9 ± 2.9 to 18.6 ± 4.8 mL.kg.min; p time = 0.011) and 1.5 ± 2.5 mL.kg.min (16.8 ± 4.0 to 18.6 ± 5.5 mL.kg.min; p time = 0.011), and quality of life score decreased by 14 ± 15 (25.8 ± 14.8 to 10.3 ± 7.8 points; p time = 0.001) and 12 ± 28 points (33.8 ± 23.8 to 19.0 ± 15.1 points; p time = 0.001), but no difference was observed between groups (peak VO: p interaction = 0.921 and quality of life: p interaction = 0.921). The functional and strength training increased the activity status index by 6.5 ± 12 and 5.2 ± 13 points (p time = 0.001), respectively, and gait speed by 0.2 ± 0.3 m/s (p time = 0.002) in both groups.
Functional and strength training are equally effective in improving peak VO, quality of life, and functionality in individuals with HF. These findings suggest that functional training may be a promising and innovative exercise-based strategy to treat HF.
NCT03321682. Registered date: 26/10/2017.
功能性训练可能是心力衰竭(HF)的一种有效非药物治疗方法。本研究旨在比较功能性训练和力量训练对 HF 患者峰值 VO 和生活质量的影响。
一项随机、平行设计、检查者盲法对照临床试验,采用隐蔽分组、意向治疗和方案分析。27 名患有慢性 HF 的参与者被随机分配到功能性或力量训练组,进行为期 12 周的每周 3 次、共 36 次的身体训练。主要结局指标为心肺运动试验评估的峰值 VO 和生活质量,分别由明尼苏达州心力衰竭生活质量问卷评估。次要结局指标包括杜克活动状态指数和步态速度测试评估的功能,肱动脉血流介导扩张评估的内皮功能,手握力和 mano 体积描记术评估的外周和吸气肌力量,分别为手臂肌肉周长评估的瘦体重。
参与者年龄为 60±7 岁,左心室射血分数为 29±8.5%。功能性和力量训练组的结果分别为:峰值 VO 增加了 1.4±3.2(16.9±2.9 至 18.6±4.8 mL.kg.min;p time=0.011)和 1.5±2.5 mL.kg.min(16.8±4.0 至 18.6±5.5 mL.kg.min;p time=0.011),生活质量评分降低了 14±15(25.8±14.8 至 10.3±7.8 分;p time=0.001)和 12±28 分(33.8±23.8 至 19.0±15.1 分;p time=0.001),但两组之间无差异(峰值 VO:p 交互=0.921 和生活质量:p 交互=0.921)。功能性和力量训练分别使活动状态指数增加了 6.5±12 和 5.2±13 分(p time=0.001),两组的步态速度均增加了 0.2±0.3 m/s(p time=0.002)。
功能性训练和力量训练在改善 HF 患者的峰值 VO、生活质量和功能方面同样有效。这些发现表明,功能性训练可能是治疗 HF 的一种有前途和创新的基于运动的策略。
NCT03321682。注册日期:2017 年 10 月 26 日。