• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利生育专家对子宫内膜搔刮术应用的观点、行为和态度。

Fertility specialists' views, behavior, and attitudes towards the use of endometrial scratching in Italy.

机构信息

Sant'Andrea Hospital, University "Sapienza" of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Eugin, Taranto, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Womens Health. 2023 Jul 29;23(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02564-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12905-023-02564-0
PMID:37516869
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10386779/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endometrial scratching (ES) or injury is intentional damage to the endometrium performed to improve reproductive outcomes for infertile women desiring pregnancy. Moreover, recent systematic reviews with meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials demonstrated that ES is not effective, data on the safety are limited, and it should not be recommended in clinical practice. The aim of the current study was to assess the view and behavior towards ES among fertility specialists throughout infertility centers in Italy, and the relationship between these views and the attitudes towards the use of ES as an add-on in their commercial setting.

METHODS

Online survey among infertility centers, affiliated to Italian Society of Human Reproduction (SIRU), was performed using a detailed questionnaire including 45 questions with the possibility to give "closed" multi-choice answers for 41 items and "open" answers for 4 items. Online data from the websites of the infertility centers resulting in affiliation with the specialists were also recorded and analyzed. The quality of information about ES given on infertility centers websites was assessed using a scoring matrix including 10 specific questions (scored from 0 to 2 points), and the possible scores ranged from 0 to 13 points ('excellent' if the score was 9 points or more, 'moderate' if the score was between 5 and 8, and 'poor' if it was 4 points or less).

RESULTS

The response rate was of 60.6% (43 questionnaires / 71 infertility SIRU-affiliated centers). All included questionnaires were completed in their entirety. Most physicians (~ 70%) reported to offer ES to less than 10% of their patients. The procedure is mainly performed in the secretory phase (69.2%) using pipelle (61.5%), and usually in medical ambulatory (56.4%) before IVF cycles to improve implantation (71.8%) without drugs administration (e.g., pain drugs, antibiotics, anti-hemorrhagics, or others) before (76.8%) or after (64.1%) the procedure. Only a little proportion of infertility centers included in the analysis proposes formally the ES as an add-on procedure (9.3%), even if, when proposed, the full description of the indications, efficacy, safety, and costs is never addressed. However, the overall information quality of the websites was generally "poor" ranging from 3 to 8 and having a low total score (4.7 ± 1.6; mean ± standard deviation).

CONCLUSIONS

In Italy, ES is a procedure still performed among fertility specialists for improving the implantation rate in IVF patients. Moreover, they have a poor attitude in proposing ES as an add-on in the commercial setting.

摘要

背景

子宫内膜搔刮术(ES)或损伤是一种有意损害子宫内膜的操作,旨在提高有生育需求的不孕妇女的生殖结局。此外,最近的系统评价和随机对照试验表明,ES 并不有效,安全性数据有限,因此不应在临床实践中推荐。本研究的目的是评估意大利不孕中心的生育专家对 ES 的看法和行为,以及这些观点与他们对 ES 作为附加治疗在商业环境中的应用的态度之间的关系。

方法

使用详细问卷对意大利生殖学会(SIRU)附属的不孕中心进行在线调查,问卷包括 45 个问题,其中 41 个问题可以选择“封闭式”多项选择答案,4 个问题可以选择“开放式”答案。还记录和分析了不孕中心网站上的在线数据,这些数据导致了与专家的隶属关系。使用包括 10 个具体问题的评分矩阵评估了不孕中心网站上提供的 ES 信息质量(评分从 0 到 2 分),可能的分数范围为 0 到 13 分(如果分数为 9 分或更高,则为“优秀”,如果分数为 5 到 8 分,则为“中等”,如果分数为 4 分或更低,则为“差”)。

结果

应答率为 60.6%(71 个 SIRU 附属不孕中心中的 43 份问卷)。所有纳入的问卷均完整填写。大多数医生(~70%)报告说,他们只为不到 10%的患者提供 ES。该操作主要在分泌期(69.2%)进行,使用 Pipelle(61.5%),通常在 IVF 周期前在医疗门诊(56.4%)进行,以改善植入(71.8%),而不进行药物治疗(如止痛药、抗生素、止血药或其他药物),无论是在操作前(76.8%)还是后(64.1%)。只有一小部分纳入分析的不孕中心正式提出 ES 作为附加程序(9.3%),即使提出了,也从未涉及适应症、疗效、安全性和费用的全面描述。然而,网站的整体信息质量普遍较差,评分为 3 到 8 分,总得分较低(4.7±1.6;平均值±标准差)。

结论

在意大利,ES 仍然是生育专家为提高 IVF 患者的着床率而进行的一项操作。此外,他们在将 ES 作为附加治疗在商业环境中提出时态度不佳。

相似文献

1
Fertility specialists' views, behavior, and attitudes towards the use of endometrial scratching in Italy.意大利生育专家对子宫内膜搔刮术应用的观点、行为和态度。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Jul 29;23(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02564-0.
2
The effect of endometrial scratching on reproductive outcomes in infertile women undergoing IVF treatment cycles.子宫内膜搔刮术对接受试管婴儿治疗周期的不孕妇女生殖结局的影响。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Nov;42(8):3611-3615. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2133995. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
3
Pipelle for Pregnancy (PIP): study protocols for three randomised controlled trials.妊娠用 Pipelle 取样器(PIP):三项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Apr 27;17(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1301-9.
4
Endometrial injury in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF).接受体外受精(IVF)的女性的子宫内膜损伤。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 10;6(6):CD009517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009517.pub4.
5
Endometrial scratching for subfertility: everyone's doing it.子宫内膜搔刮术治疗生育力低下:人人都在做。
Hum Reprod. 2016 Jun;31(6):1241-4. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew053. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
6
Does endometrial scratching increase the rate of spontaneous conception in couples with unexplained infertility and a good prognosis (Hunault > 30%)? Study protocol of the SCRaTCH-OFO trial: a randomized controlled trial.不明原因不孕且预后良好(Hunault>30%)的夫妇中,子宫内膜搔刮术是否能提高自然妊娠率?SCRaTCH-OFO 试验研究方案:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Dec 29;18(1):511. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2160-z.
7
Endometrial injury for pregnancy following sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination.性交或宫内人工授精后子宫内膜损伤与妊娠
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 14(6):CD011424. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011424.pub2.
8
Endometrial scratching for infertility: The never-ending story.子宫内膜搔刮术治疗不孕:一个永无止境的故事。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Jun;49(6):101743. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101743. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
9
The effect of endometrial scratching on pregnancy rate after failed intrauterine insemination: A Randomised Controlled Trail.子宫内膜搔刮对宫腔内人工授精失败后妊娠率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Jan;268:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.10.028. Epub 2021 Oct 31.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

本文引用的文献

1
Endometrial Scratching for Improving Endometrial Receptivity: a Critical Review of Old and New Clinical Evidence.子宫内膜搔刮术改善子宫内膜容受性:旧和新临床证据的批判性回顾。
Reprod Sci. 2023 Jun;30(6):1701-1711. doi: 10.1007/s43032-022-01125-4. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
2
Is the era of the endometrial scratching finished?子宫内膜搔刮术的时代结束了吗?
Fertil Steril. 2022 Sep;118(3):603. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.06.019. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
3
Endometrial scratching: is it all over?子宫内膜搔刮术:一切都结束了吗?
Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Apr;44(4):583-585. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.03.018.
4
Endometrial scratch in women undergoing first-time IVF treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.首次接受体外受精治疗的女性中进行子宫内膜搔刮术:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Apr;44(4):617-629. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.11.021. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
5
Effect of endometrial scratching on unassisted conception for unexplained infertility: a randomized controlled trial.子宫内膜搔刮术对不明原因不孕患者自然妊娠的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Fertil Steril. 2022 Mar;117(3):612-619. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.12.009. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
6
Endometrial scratching in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom (UK): a follow-up survey.澳大利亚、新西兰和英国的子宫内膜搔刮术:一项随访调查。
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2023 Jul;26(3):599-604. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2021.1995902. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
7
A randomized trial of endometrial scratching in women with PCOS undergoing ovulation induction cycles.多囊卵巢综合征患者行诱导排卵周期中子宫内膜搔刮的随机试验。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Feb;44(2):316-323. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.10.008. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
8
Economic evaluation of endometrial scratching before the second IVF/ICSI treatment: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized controlled trial (SCRaTCH trial).第二次 IVF/ICSI 治疗前进行子宫内膜搔刮的经济学评价:一项随机对照试验(SCRaTCH 试验)的成本效益分析。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Jan 28;37(2):254-263. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab261.
9
The crafting of hope: Contextualising add-ons in the treatment trajectories of IVF patients.希望的构建:在 IVF 患者的治疗轨迹中对附加治疗进行情境化理解。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Oct;287:114317. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114317. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
10
Time associations between U.S. birth rates and add-Ons to IVF practice between 2005-2016.2005-2016 年美国出生率与体外受精实践附加项目之间的时间关联。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021 Jul 13;19(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00793-2.