Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Neurology Service, Stroke Centre, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Stroke Research Center Bern, Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Eur J Neurol. 2023 Dec;30(12):3741-3750. doi: 10.1111/ene.16009. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
The best management of acute ischemic stroke patients with a minor stroke and large vessel occlusion is still uncertain. Specific clinical and radiological data may help to select patients who would benefit from endovascular therapy (EVT). We aimed to evaluate the relevance of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) subitems for predicting the potential benefit of providing EVT after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT; "bridging treatment") versus IVT alone.
We extracted demographic, clinical, risk factor, radiological, revascularization and outcome data of consecutive patients with M1 or proximal M2 middle cerebral artery occlusion and admission NIHSS scores of 0-5 points, treated with IVT ± EVT between May 2005 and March 2021, from nine prospectively constructed stroke registries at seven French and two Swiss comprehensive stroke centers. Adjusted interaction analyses were performed between admission NIHSS subitems and revascularization modality for two primary outcomes at 3 months: non-excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 2-6) and difference in NIHSS score between 3 months and admission.
Of the 533 patients included (median age 68.2 years, 46% women, median admission NIHSS score 3), 136 (25.5%) initially received bridging therapy and 397 (74.5%) received IVT alone. Adjusted interaction analysis revealed that only facial palsy on admission was more frequently associated with excellent outcome in patients treated by IVT alone versus bridging therapy (odds ratio 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.24-0.91; p = 0.013). Regarding NIHSS difference at 3 months, no single NIHSS subitem interacted with type of revascularization.
This retrospective multicenter analysis found that NIHSS subitems at admission had little value in predicting patients who might benefit from bridging therapy as opposed to IVT alone. Further research is needed to identify better markers for selecting EVT responders with minor strokes.
对于小卒中和大血管闭塞的急性缺血性卒中患者,最佳的治疗方法仍不确定。特定的临床和影像学数据可能有助于选择那些可能从血管内治疗(EVT)中获益的患者。我们旨在评估国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)分项对预测静脉溶栓(IVT)后提供 EVT 与单独 IVT 相比潜在获益的相关性。
我们从 2005 年 5 月至 2021 年 3 月期间在法国的 7 家综合卒中中心和瑞士的 2 家综合卒中中心的 9 个前瞻性构建的卒中登记处中,提取了连续接受 M1 或近端 M2 大脑中动脉闭塞且入院 NIHSS 评分为 0-5 分并接受 IVT±EVT 治疗的患者的人口统计学、临床、危险因素、影像学、再通和结局数据。对入院 NIHSS 分项与两种主要结局(3 个月时非优秀功能结局[改良 Rankin 量表评分 2-6]和 NIHSS 评分与入院时的差值)之间的再通方式进行了调整后的交互分析。
在纳入的 533 例患者中(中位年龄 68.2 岁,46%为女性,中位入院 NIHSS 评分为 3),136 例(25.5%)最初接受了桥接治疗,397 例(74.5%)接受了单独 IVT 治疗。调整后的交互分析显示,只有入院时的面瘫在单独接受 IVT 治疗的患者中更常与良好结局相关,而不是桥接治疗(比值比 0.47,95%置信区间 0.24-0.91;p=0.013)。关于 3 个月时 NIHSS 差值,没有单个 NIHSS 分项与再通类型相互作用。
这项回顾性多中心分析发现,入院时 NIHSS 分项对预测可能从桥接治疗中获益的患者,与单独 IVT 相比,价值不大。需要进一步研究以确定更好的标记物,以选择小卒中的 EVT 反应者。