Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (T.D., E.I.P., N.S., J.K., J.G., P.M.), Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Neurology (B.V., T.R.M., M.A., U.F., S.J., M.R.H), Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern, Switzerland.
Stroke. 2021 Mar;52(3):802-810. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031672. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
Treatment in stroke patients with M2 segment occlusion of the middle cerebral artery presenting with mild neurological deficits is a matter of debate. The main purpose was to compare the outcome in patients with a minor stroke and a M2 occlusion.
Consecutive intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) eligible patients admitted to the Bernese stroke center between January 2005 and January 2020 with acute occlusion of the M2 segment and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≤5 were included. Outcome was compared between IVT only versus endovascular therapy (EVT) including intra-arterial thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy (MT; ±IVT) and between IVT only versus MT only.
Among 169 patients (38.5% women, median age 70.2 years), 84 (49.7%) received IVT only and 85 (50.3%) EVT (±IVT), the latter including 39 (45.9%) treated with MT only. Groups were similar in sex, age, vascular risk factors, event cause, or preevent independency. Compared with IVT only, there was no difference in favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2) for EVT (adjusted odds ratio, 0.96; adjusted =0.935) or for MT only (adjusted odds ratio, 1.12; adjusted =0.547) groups. Considering only patients treated after 2015, there was a significantly better 3-month modified Rankin Scale shift (adjusted =0.032) in the EVT compared with the IVT only group.
Our study demonstrates similar effectiveness of IVT only versus EVT (±IVT), and of IVT only versus MT only in patients with peripheral middle cerebral artery occlusions and minor neurological deficits and indicates a possible benefit of EVT considering only patients treated after 2015. There is an unmet need for randomized controlled trials in this stroke field, including imaging parameters, and more sophisticated evaluation of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score subitems, neurocognition, and quality of life neglected by the standard outcome scales such as modified Rankin Scale and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score.
对于大脑中动脉 M2 段闭塞伴轻度神经功能缺损的卒中患者的治疗存在争议。本研究的主要目的是比较伴有轻度卒中的 M2 段闭塞患者的治疗结局。
连续纳入 2005 年 1 月至 2020 年 1 月间因大脑中动脉 M2 段急性闭塞且国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分≤5 而入住伯尔尼卒中中心且符合静脉溶栓(IVT)标准的患者。比较仅接受 IVT 与血管内治疗(EVT)(包括动脉内溶栓和机械血栓切除术[MT];±IVT)以及仅接受 IVT 与仅接受 MT 之间的结局。
在 169 例患者中(38.5%为女性,中位年龄 70.2 岁),84 例(49.7%)仅接受 IVT,85 例(50.3%)接受 EVT(±IVT),其中 39 例(45.9%)仅接受 MT。两组在性别、年龄、血管危险因素、病因或发病前独立性方面相似。与仅接受 IVT 相比,EVT(调整优势比,0.96;调整后 P=0.935)或仅接受 MT(调整优势比,1.12;调整后 P=0.547)组的预后无差异(改良 Rankin 量表评分 0-2)。考虑仅接受 2015 年后治疗的患者,与仅接受 IVT 组相比,EVT 组 3 个月时改良 Rankin 量表评分的改善具有显著差异(调整后 P=0.032)。
本研究表明,对于大脑中动脉 M2 段周围闭塞伴轻度神经功能缺损的患者,仅接受 IVT 与 EVT(±IVT)或仅接受 IVT 与 MT 的效果相似,并提示仅考虑 2015 年后接受治疗的患者,EVT 可能具有获益。该卒中领域仍存在未满足的需求,包括影像学参数以及对国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分亚项、神经认知和生活质量等标准结局量表忽略的因素进行更复杂的评估。