Chairat Sumonrat, Gheewala Shabbir H
Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand; Centre of Excellence on Energy Technology and Environment, Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation, Bangkok, Thailand.
Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand; Centre of Excellence on Energy Technology and Environment, Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation, Bangkok, Thailand.
Environ Res. 2023 Nov 1;236(Pt 1):116788. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116788. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) recycling is considered as one of the key approaches to achieving the circular economy (CE) of plastic waste. Bottle-to-Bottle and Bottle-to-Fiber recycling were assessed using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Material Circularity Indicator (MCI). Three allocation methods (i.e., substitution, recycled content, and economic allocation) were used to deal with the recycling system. Producing bottle-grade PET resin and polyester fiber from PET bottle waste can reduce environmental impacts for most midpoint impact categories (e.g., 60% greenhouse gas emissions reduction and 85% fossil resource scarcity reduction). At the endpoint level, the damages to resources, ecosystem quality, and human health of the recycled PET bottles derived from Bottle-to-Bottle recycling were less than virgin PET bottles when using the substitution and recycled content methods. When using the economic allocation method, the final LCA findings highly depended on the recycled content used to produce the PET bottles. On the other hand, regardless of the allocation method used, recycled polyester fiber derived from Bottle-to-Fiber recycling caused less environmental damages than virgin polyester fiber. The MCI scores of Bottle-to-Bottle recycling in the baseline scenarios range between 0.20 and 0.31, whereas the MCI scores of the expected scenario in the future show a higher level of material circularity (0.55-0.60) as a result of 100% collection rate for recycling of PET bottles and the use of recycled PET as a feedstock. Therefore, higher collection rates and recycled content support Bottle-to-Bottle recycling. On the other hand, the MCI score of Bottle-to-Fiber recycling in the baseline scenario is 0.52. This high score resulted from the use of 100% recycled PET as a feedstock of polyester fiber. Recycling polyester fiber at the end-of-life could further increase the MCI to almost 0.7. However, to keep the materials at their highest quality and value, Bottle-to-Bottle recycling should be the preferred option.
聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯(PET)回收被视为实现塑料垃圾循环经济(CE)的关键途径之一。采用生命周期评估(LCA)和材料循环指标(MCI)对瓶到瓶和瓶到纤维回收进行了评估。使用了三种分配方法(即替代法、回收含量法和经济分配法)来处理回收系统。用PET瓶废料生产瓶级PET树脂和聚酯纤维可减少大多数中点影响类别的环境影响(例如,温室气体排放量减少60%,化石资源稀缺性减少85%)。在终点层面,当使用替代法和回收含量法时,瓶到瓶回收的再生PET瓶对资源、生态系统质量和人类健康的损害小于原生PET瓶。使用经济分配法时,最终的LCA结果高度依赖于用于生产PET瓶的回收含量。另一方面,无论使用何种分配方法,瓶到纤维回收产生的再生聚酯纤维造成的环境损害都比原生聚酯纤维小。基线情景下瓶到瓶回收的MCI分数在0.20至0.31之间,而未来预期情景的MCI分数由于PET瓶回收的100%收集率以及使用再生PET作为原料而显示出更高的材料循环水平(0.55 - 0.60)。因此,更高的收集率和回收含量支持瓶到瓶回收。另一方面,基线情景下瓶到纤维回收的MCI分数为0.52。这个高分源于使用100%再生PET作为聚酯纤维的原料。在使用寿命结束时回收聚酯纤维可进一步将MCI提高到近0.7。然而,为了保持材料的最高质量和价值,瓶到瓶回收应是首选方案。