• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从学生药剂师视角对药学教育认证委员会(ACPE)标准4关键要素的质性探索

A Qualitative Exploration of ACPE Standard 4 Key Elements From the Perspective of Student Pharmacists.

作者信息

Murry Logan T, Murry Janice S, Pick Amy, Witry Matthew J

机构信息

University of Iowa, College of Pharmacy, Iowa City, IA, USA; Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education, Chicago, IL, USA.

University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Pharmacy, Omaha, NE, USA.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Dec;87(12):100581. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100581. Epub 2023 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100581
PMID:37517524
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Attitudes and skills reflecting the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education Standard 4 (ACPE-S4) remain an important component of pharmacy education. The objectives of this study were (1) explore student perspectives on the importance of ACPE-S4 key elements, and (2) identify experiences that students described as supporting ACPE-S4 attitude and skill development.

METHODS

This was a qualitative study using focus groups and dyadic interviews with student pharmacists to collect data on ACPE-S4 key element importance and skill acquisition. A general inductive qualitative approach was used to analyze data, with 2 study authors independently reviewing all transcripts and assigning codes to text segments. Authors then met to discuss coding, iteratively organize coded segments into categories and subcategories, and select representative quotes.

RESULTS

Overall, 3 focus groups and 3 dyadic interviews were conducted with a total of 20 students. Students ranked professionalism and self-awareness as the 2 most important key elements. From qualitative analysis, 4 categories and 10 subcategories of educational activities, programs, and experiences were identified as follows: Mentorship (Identifying a Mentor, Formal Mentorship Programs), Curriculum (Practice Lab, Professional Development Course, Interprofessional Education, Experiential Education), Cocurriculum (Organizational Involvement, Volunteer Hours), and Opportunities Outside Academic Setting (Work, Conferences, and Innovative Pharmacy Practices).

CONCLUSION

Participants articulated several opportunities for developing the skills and attitudes reflecting ACPE-S4 key elements. Incorporating student input into ACPE-S4 attitude and skill development may help pharmacy programs consider how to design, refine, and implement initiatives and experiences to help students develop skills across ACPE-S4 focus areas.

摘要

目的

反映药学教育认证委员会标准4(ACPE - S4)的态度和技能仍然是药学教育的重要组成部分。本研究的目的是:(1)探讨学生对ACPE - S4关键要素重要性的看法;(2)确定学生描述为支持ACPE - S4态度和技能发展的经历。

方法

这是一项定性研究,采用焦点小组和与学生药剂师的二元访谈来收集关于ACPE - S4关键要素重要性和技能获得的数据。采用一般归纳定性方法分析数据,由2名研究作者独立审查所有转录本并为文本段分配代码。然后作者们会面讨论编码,反复将编码段组织成类别和子类别,并选择有代表性的引述。

结果

总体而言,共进行了3个焦点小组和3次二元访谈,涉及20名学生。学生将专业精神和自我意识列为两个最重要的关键要素。通过定性分析,确定了教育活动、项目和经历的4个类别和10个子类别,如下所示:指导(确定导师、正式指导计划)、课程(实践实验室、专业发展课程、跨专业教育、体验式教育)、辅助课程(组织参与、志愿时长)以及学术环境之外的机会(工作、会议和创新药学实践)。

结论

参与者阐述了培养反映ACPE - S4关键要素的技能和态度的若干机会。将学生的意见纳入ACPE - S4态度和技能发展中,可能有助于药学项目考虑如何设计、完善和实施相关举措及经历,以帮助学生在ACPE - S4重点领域发展技能。

相似文献

1
A Qualitative Exploration of ACPE Standard 4 Key Elements From the Perspective of Student Pharmacists.从学生药剂师视角对药学教育认证委员会(ACPE)标准4关键要素的质性探索
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Dec;87(12):100581. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100581. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
2
Perspectives of Professionalism, Self-Awareness, Leadership, and Innovation and Entrepreneurship From Experiential Education Preceptors.从体验式教育导师的角度看专业精神、自我意识、领导力、创新和创业精神。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Aug;87(8):100106. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100106. Epub 2023 May 9.
3
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Action learning and public health pedagogy: Student reflections from an experiential public health course.行动学习与公共卫生教学法:一门体验式公共卫生课程中学生的反思。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 28;11:1128705. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1128705. eCollection 2023.
6
From Reductionist Skills to Meaningful Learning: Trust and Humility in Bedside Cardiac Assessment.从还原论技能到有意义的学习:床边心脏评估中的信任与谦逊
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 Aug 5;16:1305-1316. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S520398. eCollection 2025.
7
Pharmacy Students' Perspective on Business Management for the Community Pharmacist.药学专业学生对社区药剂师商业管理的看法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Dec;87(12):100563. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100563. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
8
Attitudes and opinions of pharmacy undergraduates towards the integration of innovation and entrepreneurship programs into professional education.药学专业本科生对将创新创业项目融入专业教育的态度和看法。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Sep 2;25(1):1244. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07881-6.
9
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
10
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险