The Second Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Int Wound J. 2023 Dec;20(10):4200-4207. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14318. Epub 2023 Jul 30.
This meta-analysis examined the post-operative wound effect of both obese and non-obese in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients. To gather as complete an overview as possible, the researchers took advantage of 4 databases-PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science-to conduct a critical assessment. Following the development of inclusion and exclusion criteria, the researchers evaluated the quality of each document. A total of 9 related trials were conducted to determine the 95% CI (CI) and OR using a fixed-effect model. The final meta-analyses were conducted with RevMan 5.3. Our findings indicate that there is no statistically significant benefit in terms of post-operative wound complications among obese and non-obese patients. Obese subjects had a significantly higher risk of injury than those without obesity (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.04, 1.95, p = 0.03); obesity was also associated with a significantly higher risk of operative site infection than in non-obese subjects (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.76, 2.18, p < 0.0001); and after surgery, there was also a significant increase in the risk of post-operative wound infections among obese subjects than in non-obese subjects (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.34, 1.84, p < 0.0001). However, due to the small size of the cohort study in this meta-study, caution is required in the analysis. More randomized, controlled studies will be needed to validate these results.
这项荟萃分析检查了肥胖和非肥胖患者全髋关节置换术(THA)术后伤口的影响。为了尽可能全面地收集资料,研究人员利用 4 个数据库(PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science)进行了批判性评估。在制定纳入和排除标准后,研究人员评估了每份文献的质量。共进行了 9 项相关试验,以使用固定效应模型确定 95%CI(CI)和 OR。使用 RevMan 5.3 进行最终的荟萃分析。我们的研究结果表明,肥胖和非肥胖患者术后伤口并发症方面没有统计学上的显著获益。肥胖患者的损伤风险明显高于非肥胖患者(OR,1.43;95%CI,1.04,1.95,p=0.03);肥胖患者的手术部位感染风险也明显高于非肥胖患者(OR,1.96;95%CI,1.76,2.18,p<0.0001);术后,肥胖患者的术后伤口感染风险也明显高于非肥胖患者(OR,1.57;95%CI,1.34,1.84,p<0.0001)。然而,由于这项荟萃分析中的队列研究规模较小,在分析时需要谨慎。需要更多的随机对照研究来验证这些结果。