Research Group for Health Promotion in Settings, Department of Health, Social and Welfare Studies, University of South-Eastern Norway, Borre, Norway.
Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Jan;80(1):42-59. doi: 10.1111/jan.15804. Epub 2023 Jul 30.
To determine antecedents and outcomes of work engagement (WE) among nursing staff in long-term care (LTC) using the Job Demand-Resources model.
A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement and Synthesis Without Meta-analysis in systematic reviews guideline. A study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (registration number CRD42022336736).
The initial searches were performed in PsycInfo, Medline, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL and Scopus and yielded 3050 unique publications. Updated searches identified another 335 publications. Sixteen studies published from 2010 to 2022 were included.
The screening of titles and abstracts, and subsequently full-text publications, was performed blinded by two author teams using the inclusion/exclusion criteria. When needed, a mutual consensus was obtained through discussion within and across the teams. A descriptive and narrative synthesis without a meta-analysis of the included studies was performed.
The extent of research on WE in LTC facilities is limited and the factors examined are heterogeneous. Of forty-two unique antecedents and outcomes, only three factors were assessed in three or more studies. Antecedents-in particular job resources-are more commonly examined than outcomes.
Existing literature offers scant evidence on antecedents and outcomes of WE among nursing staff in LTC facilities. Social support, learning and development opportunities and person-centred processes are the most examined factors, yet with ambiguous results.
Antecedents and outcomes of engagement among nursing staff in LTC facilities have not previously been reviewed systematically. Engagement has been correlated with both more efficient and higher-quality service delivery. Our findings suggest opportunities to improve health and care services by enhancing engagement, whilst at the same time better caring for employees. This study lays the groundwork for more detailed research into the contributing factors and potential results of increasing caregivers' engagement. No patient or public contribution.
利用工作需求-资源模型,确定长期护理(LTC)护理人员的工作投入(WE)的前因和结果。
遵循《系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选项目声明》和《系统评价中无荟萃分析的综合方法》的系统综述,并制定了研究方案,在 PROSPERO(注册号 CRD42022336736)中进行了注册。
最初在 PsycInfo、Medline、Academic Search Premier、CINAHL 和 Scopus 中进行了搜索,共获得 3050 篇独特的文献。更新的搜索又确定了另外 335 篇文献。纳入了 2010 年至 2022 年发表的 16 项研究。
使用纳入/排除标准,由两个作者团队对标题和摘要进行盲法筛选,随后对全文进行筛选。当需要时,通过团队内部和团队之间的讨论达成共识。对纳入研究进行描述性和叙述性综合,而不进行荟萃分析。
长期护理机构中 WE 研究的范围有限,且检查的因素存在异质性。在 42 个独特的前因和结果中,只有三个因素在三项或更多研究中进行了评估。前因——特别是工作资源——比结果更常被检查。
现有文献提供的证据表明,长期护理机构中护理人员的工作投入的前因和结果很少。社会支持、学习和发展机会以及以人为本的过程是最常被检查的因素,但结果并不明确。
长期护理机构护理人员的投入的前因和结果以前没有系统地审查过。投入与更高效和更高质量的服务提供相关。我们的发现表明,通过提高员工的投入,可以改善健康和护理服务,同时更好地照顾员工。这项研究为更详细地研究提高护理人员投入的促成因素和潜在结果奠定了基础。无患者或公众参与。