Jones Andrew
Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 13;14:1129428. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129428. eCollection 2023.
Since reports about CIA-funded LSD studies came out in the 1970s, psychedelic drugs have invoked images of unethical experimentation and "mad scientists" in the public imagination. Even now, as the stigma surrounding psychedelics diminishes in the 21st century, the figure of the "mad scientist" continues to occupy a space in what Ido Hartogsohn calls the "collective set and setting," the larger framework of cultural understandings that shape how individuals experience psychedelic drugs. Scientists and humanities scholars who study these drugs have responded to this issue by drawing boundaries between those who used psychedelics carefully and those who used them ignorantly. Yet these boundaries were not always so clear in the past. Drawing on historical examples of LSD's use as a in Canada, I show how enthusiasm about the drug's potential led several experienced and knowledgeable psychedelic therapists to use it on vulnerable populations in diverse institutional settings, such as correctional facilities. These examples reveal how the institutional context of modern industrial societies shaped the application of psychedelic therapy in the past and suggest that today's therapists need to carefully consider how this broader context impacts their work.
自20世纪70年代有关中央情报局资助的麦角酸二乙酰胺(LSD)研究的报道出现以来,迷幻药物在公众想象中引发了不道德实验和“疯狂科学家”的形象。即使在现在,随着21世纪围绕迷幻药物的污名逐渐减少,“疯狂科学家”的形象在伊多·哈托格松所称的“集体场景和背景”中仍然占据一席之地,这是一个更大的文化理解框架,塑造了个人体验迷幻药物的方式。研究这些药物的科学家和人文学者通过区分谨慎使用迷幻药物的人和无知使用迷幻药物的人来回应这个问题。然而,这些界限在过去并不总是那么清晰。借鉴加拿大将LSD用作一种……的历史例子,我展示了对该药物潜力的热情如何导致几位经验丰富且知识渊博的迷幻治疗师在不同的机构环境中,如教养设施,将其用于弱势群体。这些例子揭示了现代工业社会的机构背景如何在过去塑造了迷幻治疗的应用,并表明当今的治疗师需要仔细考虑这个更广泛的背景如何影响他们的工作。 (注:原文中“as a in Canada”部分表述不完整,可能影响准确理解,但按要求完整翻译了现有内容)