• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加纳农户创新的福利动态:对减贫的启示。

Welfare dynamics of innovations among agricultural households in Ghana: Implication for poverty reduction.

作者信息

Onumah Justina Adwoa, Osei Robert Darko, Martey Edward, Asante Felix Ankomah

机构信息

CSIR-Science and Technology Policy Research Institute, Ghana.

Institute of Statistical, Social and Economic Research, University of Ghana, Ghana.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Jul 13;9(7):e18066. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18066. eCollection 2023 Jul.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18066
PMID:37519683
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10372665/
Abstract

To reduce the high incidence of poverty in rural households, agricultural modernization using innovations has been pursued by governments and actors in the agricultural innovation system (AIS). This study analyzed how agricultural innovations and farmer-actor interactions in the AIS contribute to poverty outcomes among agricultural households in Ghana. Data used was the Ghana socio-economic panel survey data with 891 and 2595 observations for cocoa and maize households, respectively. The multinomial endogenous treatment effect model with instrumental variables was employed for the analysis. Adopting digital technologies in combination with other innovations, and having stronger farmer-actor interactions in the innovation system were associated with non-poor outcome in maize-growing households, who were poorer compared to cocoa-growing households. Innovations that consistently increased food security in both crop systems were associated with non-poor outcomes. The findings of the study highlight the need for governments and stakeholders to prioritize agricultural digitalization, encourage the adoption of multiple innovations and focus on food security-improving interventions as strategies to addressing rural poverty reduction.

摘要

为降低农村家庭的高贫困发生率,政府和农业创新系统(AIS)中的行为主体一直在推行利用创新手段实现农业现代化。本研究分析了农业创新以及AIS中农民与行为主体之间的互动如何影响加纳农业家庭的贫困状况。所用数据为加纳社会经济面板调查数据,分别有891个可可种植户观测值和2595个玉米种植户观测值。分析采用了带有工具变量的多项内生处理效应模型。在玉米种植户中,采用数字技术并结合其他创新,以及在创新系统中与行为主体有更强的互动,与非贫困结果相关,而玉米种植户比可可种植户更贫困。在两种作物系统中持续提高粮食安全的创新与非贫困结果相关。该研究结果凸显了政府和利益相关者需要优先考虑农业数字化,鼓励采用多种创新,并将重点放在改善粮食安全的干预措施上,以此作为减少农村贫困的战略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c48d/10372665/0061536f5f84/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c48d/10372665/0061536f5f84/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c48d/10372665/0061536f5f84/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Welfare dynamics of innovations among agricultural households in Ghana: Implication for poverty reduction.加纳农户创新的福利动态:对减贫的启示。
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 13;9(7):e18066. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18066. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Measuring the poverty reduction effects of adopting agricultural technologies in rural Ethiopia: findings from an endogenous switching regression approach.衡量埃塞俄比亚农村地区采用农业技术的减贫效果:基于内生转换回归方法的研究发现
Heliyon. 2022 May 18;8(5):e09495. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09495. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Health and vulnerability to poverty in Ghana: evidence from the Ghana Living Standards Survey Round 5.加纳的健康与贫困脆弱性:来自加纳生活水平调查第五轮的证据。
Health Econ Rev. 2012 May 6;2:11. doi: 10.1186/2191-1991-2-11.
4
The political economy of maize production and poverty reduction in Zambia: analysis of the last 50 years.赞比亚玉米生产与减贫的政治经济学:过去50年分析
J Asian Afr Stud. 2011;46(6):546-66. doi: 10.1177/0021909611402161.
5
Climate variability, agricultural technologies adoption, and productivity in rural Nigeria: a plot-level analysis.尼日利亚农村地区的气候变异性、农业技术采用与生产力:地块层面分析
Agric Food Secur. 2023;12(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40066-023-00411-x. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
6
Physical activity, time use, and food intakes of rural households in Ghana, India, and Nepal.加纳、印度和尼泊尔农村家庭的身体活动、时间利用和食物摄入。
Sci Data. 2020 Mar 3;7(1):71. doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-0414-x.
7
Stakeholder Collaboration in Climate-Smart Agricultural Production Innovations: Insights from the Cocoa Industry in Ghana.利益相关者在气候智能型农业生产创新中的合作:加纳可可产业的经验。
Environ Manage. 2020 Oct;66(4):600-613. doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01327-z. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
8
Rural non-farm income diversification: implications on smallholder farmers' welfare and agricultural technology adoption in Ghana.农村非农业收入多元化:对加纳小农户福利及农业技术采用的影响
Heliyon. 2020 Nov 6;6(11):e05393. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05393. eCollection 2020 Nov.
9
Do soil and water conservation practices influence crop productivity and household welfare? Evidence from rural Nigeria.水土保持措施是否会影响作物生产力和农户福利?来自尼日利亚农村的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(19):56016-56036. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26280-2. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
10
Small ruminant feed systems: perceptions and practices in the transitional zone of Ghana.小反刍动物饲料系统:加纳过渡区的认知与实践。
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2010 Mar 19;6:11. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-6-11.

本文引用的文献

1
Supporting food systems transformation: The what, why, who, where and how of mission-oriented agricultural innovation systems.支持粮食系统转型:面向任务的农业创新体系的内容、原因、主体、地点及方式
Agric Syst. 2020 Sep;184:102901. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102901. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
2
Impacts of extension access and cooperative membership on technology adoption and household welfare.推广服务的可及性与合作社成员身份对技术采用及家庭福利的影响。
J Rural Stud. 2017 Aug;54:223-233. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.022.
3
Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people.
食品安全:养活 90 亿人的挑战。
Science. 2010 Feb 12;327(5967):812-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1185383. Epub 2010 Jan 28.