• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意缺陷多动障碍成人患者健康问卷-4的因子结构

Factor structure of the patient health questionnaire-4 in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

作者信息

Havnen Audun, Lydersen Stian, Mandahl Arthur, Lara-Cabrera Mariela Loreto

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Nidaros Division of Psychiatry, Community Mental Health Centre, St. Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 14;14:1176298. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1176298. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1176298
PMID:37520219
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10375022/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Persons with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) frequently experience symptoms of anxiety and depression. In this population, there is a need for validated brief self-report screening questionnaires to assess the severity of comorbid mental health problems. The Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ-4) is a self-report questionnaire that may contribute to this purpose as it can screen for both disorders efficiently. However, this will be the first study examining the factor structure of the PHQ-4 in samples of adults with ADHD, and also evaluating the validity of the Norwegian version of the PHQ-4.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the current cross-sectional study was to examine the factor structure and validity of the Norwegian version of the PHQ-4 in a sample of adults who reported having been diagnosed with ADHD.

METHODS

Of 496 invited, a total of 326 participants (66%) completed the PHQ-4, The World Health Organization Five Well-Being Index, the Oslo Social Support Scale and the 4-item Perceived Stress Scale electronically in a web-portal between the 9th and 30th of June 2020.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analysis of the PHQ-4 supported a two-factor structure [RMSEA = 0.038 (90% CI 0.000-0.159), CFI = 1.00, TLI = 0.999, SRMR = 0.004], consisting of a depression factor and an anxiety factor. Standardized factor loadings were 0.79 to 0.97. The PHQ-4 was negatively correlated with well-being and social support and positively correlated with perceived level of stress.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates promising psychometric properties of the PHQ-4 as a measure of anxiety and depressive symptoms in adults with self-reported ADHD who are fluent in Norwegian. The questionnaire's brevity makes it a valuable resource in research and clinical settings. However, more studies are needed to test the instrument in a clinical sample.

摘要

背景

注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)患者经常出现焦虑和抑郁症状。在这一人群中,需要经过验证的简短自我报告筛查问卷来评估共病心理健康问题的严重程度。患者健康问卷4(PHQ - 4)是一份自我报告问卷,因其能够有效筛查这两种疾病,可能有助于实现这一目的。然而,这将是第一项研究成人ADHD样本中PHQ - 4的因子结构,并评估挪威版PHQ - 4有效性的研究。

目的

当前横断面研究的目的是在报告被诊断患有ADHD的成人样本中,检验挪威版PHQ - 4的因子结构和有效性。

方法

在496名受邀者中,共有326名参与者(66%)于2020年6月9日至30日期间在网络平台上以电子方式完成了PHQ - 4、世界卫生组织五福指数、奥斯陆社会支持量表和4项感知压力量表。

结果

PHQ - 4的验证性因子分析支持两因子结构[RMSEA = 0.038(90% CI 0.000 - 0.159),CFI = 1.00,TLI = 0.999,SRMR = 0.004],由一个抑郁因子和一个焦虑因子组成。标准化因子载荷为0.79至0.97。PHQ - 4与幸福感和社会支持呈负相关,与感知压力水平呈正相关。

结论

本研究表明,对于能流利使用挪威语且自我报告患有ADHD的成年人,PHQ - 4作为焦虑和抑郁症状的测量工具具有良好的心理测量特性。该问卷简短,使其在研究和临床环境中成为一种有价值的资源。然而,需要更多研究在临床样本中测试该工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc16/10375022/827fda9337b8/fpsyt-14-1176298-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc16/10375022/618127126cf4/fpsyt-14-1176298-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc16/10375022/827fda9337b8/fpsyt-14-1176298-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc16/10375022/618127126cf4/fpsyt-14-1176298-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc16/10375022/827fda9337b8/fpsyt-14-1176298-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Factor structure of the patient health questionnaire-4 in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.注意缺陷多动障碍成人患者健康问卷-4的因子结构
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 14;14:1176298. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1176298. eCollection 2023.
2
The construct validity of an abridged version of the general self-efficacy scale for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.适用于注意力缺陷多动障碍成人的一般自我效能感量表简版的结构效度。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 6;14:1212961. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1212961. eCollection 2023.
3
The psychometric properties of PHQ-4 anxiety and depression screening scale among out of school adolescent girls and young women in Tanzania: a cross-sectional study.坦桑尼亚失学青少年女孩和年轻女性中 PHQ-4 焦虑和抑郁筛查量表的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 19;20(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02735-5.
4
Psychometric properties of screening questionnaires to detect depression in primary healthcare setting in rural Ethiopia.用于在埃塞俄比亚农村初级医疗保健环境中检测抑郁症的筛查问卷的心理计量学特性。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jun 2;23(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01755-2.
5
Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in a large female sample of adults with and without eating disorders.在有和没有饮食障碍的成年女性大样本中,挪威版患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)的心理测量特性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 5;21(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-03013-0.
6
The reliability and validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and PHQ-2 in patients with infertility.患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)和 PHQ-2 在不孕患者中的信度和效度。
Reprod Health. 2019 Sep 9;16(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0802-x.
7
A computerized version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 as an ultra-brief screening tool to detect emotional disorders in primary care.计算机化的患者健康问卷-4 作为一种超简短的筛查工具,用于在初级保健中检测情绪障碍。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Jul;234:247-255. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.01.030. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
8
Psychometric Properties of a Chatbot Version of the PHQ-9 With Adults and Older Adults.适用于成年人及老年人的PHQ-9聊天机器人版本的心理测量特性
Front Digit Health. 2021 Apr 30;3:645805. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.645805. eCollection 2021.
9
Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents who have a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍的儿童和青少年的健康相关生活质量。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e541-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0844.
10
Screening for psychological distress using the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS): Initial validation of structural validity in dialysis patients.使用患者健康问卷焦虑和抑郁量表(PHQ-ADS)筛查心理困扰:透析患者结构效度的初步验证。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2018 Jan-Feb;50:15-19. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the ultra-brief self-report Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) to assess anxiety and depression in Arabic-speaking adults.超简短自评患者健康问卷-4(PHQ-4)用于评估阿拉伯语成年人焦虑和抑郁的心理测量特性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 30;24(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05978-8.
2
Longitudinal measurement invariance and psychometric properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire-Four in China.患者健康问卷-4 在中国的纵向测量不变性和心理测量特性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 22;24(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05873-2.
3
Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 among the Chilean population.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceived Social Support on the Relationship Between ADD/ADHD and Both Anxious and Depressive Symptoms Among Canadian Adults.加拿大成年人中注意到的社会支持与 ADD/ADHD 以及焦虑和抑郁症状之间的关系。
J Atten Disord. 2023 Feb;27(3):283-293. doi: 10.1177/10870547221136227. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
2
A digital Norwegian version of the client satisfaction questionnaire 8: factor validity and internal reliability in outpatient mental health care.挪威语数字化版患者满意度问卷 8 版:在精神科门诊患者中的因子有效性和内部信度。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 31;22(1):671. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04281-8.
3
Validating the Five-Item World Health Organization Well-Being Index.
智利人群中患者健康问卷-4 的因子结构和测量不变性。
PLoS One. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0304623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304623. eCollection 2024.
4
The construct validity of an abridged version of the general self-efficacy scale for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.适用于注意力缺陷多动障碍成人的一般自我效能感量表简版的结构效度。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 6;14:1212961. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1212961. eCollection 2023.
5
Measuring patient satisfaction with four items: validity of the client satisfaction questionnaire 4 in an outpatient population.用四项指标衡量患者满意度:门诊人群中客户满意度问卷 4 的有效性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 7;23(1):808. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05310-w.
验证五项世界卫生组织幸福指数。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 13;19(18):11489. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811489.
4
ADHD Symptoms as a Stressor Leading to Depressive Symptoms among University Students: The Mediating Role of Perceived Stress between ADHD and Depression.ADHD 症状作为导致大学生抑郁症状的应激源:注意缺陷多动障碍与抑郁之间的中介作用是感知压力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 4;19(17):11091. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711091.
5
Update of the standardization of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in the general population.患者健康问卷-4(PHQ-4)在一般人群中标准化的更新。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Sep 1;312:310-314. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.06.054. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
6
Validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) to screen for depression and anxiety in the Greek general population.验证患者健康问卷-4(PHQ-4)在希腊普通人群中筛查抑郁和焦虑。
J Psychosom Res. 2022 Sep;160:110970. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110970. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
7
The factor structure and measurement invariance of the PHQ-4 and the prevalence of depression and anxiety in a Southeast Asian context amid the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情背景下,东南亚地区患者健康问卷-4(PHQ-4)的因子结构、测量不变性以及抑郁和焦虑的患病率
Curr Psychol. 2022 Mar 1:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-02833-5.
8
Prevalence rates of anxiety, depressive, and eating pathology symptoms between the pre- and peri-COVID-19 eras: A meta-analysis.新冠疫情前后时期焦虑、抑郁和饮食失调症状的流行率:一项荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Feb 1;298(Pt A):364-372. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.115. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
9
Systematic Review: Investigating the Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health Outcomes of Individuals With ADHD.系统评价:调查2019冠状病毒病对注意力缺陷多动障碍患者心理健康结局的影响
J Atten Disord. 2022 May;26(7):959-975. doi: 10.1177/10870547211050945. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.2020 年新冠肺炎大流行前后的纵向队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析比较心理健康。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jan 1;296:567-576. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.09.098. Epub 2021 Oct 1.