• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧盟的好客与欢迎文化:在欧盟基本自由与移民治理中构想“没有人是非法的”原则

The EU's Hospitality and Welcome Culture: Conceiving the "No Human Being Is Illegal" Principle in the EU Fundamental Freedoms and Migration Governance.

作者信息

Aliu Armando, Aliu Dorian

机构信息

European Research Academy (ERA), Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Hum Rights Rev. 2022;23(3):413-435. doi: 10.1007/s12142-022-00662-4. Epub 2022 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1007/s12142-022-00662-4
PMID:37520641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8934602/
Abstract

This article aims to highlight the theoretical and philosophical debate on hospitality underlining the normative elements of framing migrants and refugees as individual agents in the light of hospitality theory and migration governance. It argued the critiques of the neo-Kantian hospitality approach and the EU welcome culture with regard to refugees in the EU from a philosophical perspective. The "No human being is illegal" motto is proposed to be conceived as a principle of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. The cosmopolitan right to visit and the universal right to reside were discussed in the context of human rights and co-responsibility. Linking the hospitality approach with migration governance enables the reconstruction of reception policies and practices, diversification of non-state actors that engage in migration governance mechanism, and polarization of political initiatives (e.g., politics of allocation and dispersal, readmission negotiations, convergence/divergence of priorities and strategic interests). The research findings highlight that the EU adopted a neo-Kantian hospitality approach that combines both "co-responsibility" and "vertical/heterarchical relations." The EU's "New Pact on Migration and Asylum" was considered proof of how the EU follows neo-Kantian hospitality that is manifested in dualism and contradictory approach. The study presents a typology that splits co-responsibility into individual/institutional actions and human rights/migration governance.

摘要

本文旨在突出关于好客之道的理论和哲学辩论,强调根据好客理论和移民治理将移民和难民界定为个体行为者的规范性要素。从哲学角度论证了对新康德主义好客之道方法以及欧盟对欧盟境内难民的欢迎文化的批判。提议将“没有人是非法的”这一格言视为《欧盟基本权利宪章》的一项原则。在人权和共同责任的背景下讨论了世界主义的访问权和普遍居住权。将好客之道方法与移民治理联系起来能够重建接纳政策和做法、使参与移民治理机制的非国家行为体多样化,以及使政治倡议两极分化(例如分配和分散政策、重新接纳谈判、优先事项和战略利益的趋同/分歧)。研究结果突出表明,欧盟采用了一种结合“共同责任”和“垂直/等级关系”的新康德主义好客之道方法。欧盟的《新移民与庇护公约》被视为欧盟如何遵循以二元论和矛盾方法体现的新康德主义好客之道的证据。该研究提出了一种类型学,将共同责任分为个人/机构行动以及人权/移民治理。

相似文献

1
The EU's Hospitality and Welcome Culture: Conceiving the "No Human Being Is Illegal" Principle in the EU Fundamental Freedoms and Migration Governance.欧盟的好客与欢迎文化:在欧盟基本自由与移民治理中构想“没有人是非法的”原则
Hum Rights Rev. 2022;23(3):413-435. doi: 10.1007/s12142-022-00662-4. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
2
Rethinking Vulnerability as a Radically Ethical Device: Ethical Vulnerability Analysis and the EU's "Migration Crisis".将脆弱性重新思考为一种根本的伦理手段:伦理脆弱性分析与欧盟的“移民危机”
Hum Rights Rev. 2023 Jun 14:1-26. doi: 10.1007/s12142-023-00685-5.
3
The EU as Active and Passive Political Determinant of Forced Migrants' Health: Insights from the Case of Germany.欧盟作为主动和被动政治决定因素对被迫移民健康的影响:以德国为例的观点。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2024 Oct 1;49(5):721-741. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11256992.
4
Is the EU shirking responsibility for its deforestation footprint in tropical countries? Power, material, and epistemic inequalities in the EU's global environmental governance.欧盟是否在逃避其在热带国家森林砍伐足迹方面的责任?欧盟全球环境治理中的权力、物质和认知不平等。
Sustain Sci. 2023;18(2):599-616. doi: 10.1007/s11625-023-01302-7. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
5
Environmentally driven migration in EU discourse: norms, policies and realities.欧盟话语中环境驱动的移民:规范、政策与现实
UCL Open Environ. 2024 Mar 26;6:e1975. doi: 10.14324/111.444/ucloe.1975. eCollection 2024.
6
China's impact on the European Union's Arctic policy: critical junctures, crossovers, and geographic shifts.中国对欧盟北极政策的影响:关键节点、交叉领域与地理转移
Asia Eur J. 2021;19(4):467-487. doi: 10.1007/s10308-021-00605-7. Epub 2021 May 29.
7
National gambling policies and the containment of the EU's politico-legal influence.国家赌博政策与欧盟政治法律影响力的遏制
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2019 Apr;36(2):77-90. doi: 10.1177/1455072519835703. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
8
Analysing the EU's collective securitisation moves towards China.分析欧盟针对中国的集体证券化举措。
Asia Eur J. 2022;20(2):195-216. doi: 10.1007/s10308-021-00640-4. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
9
From discourse to practice: the circulation of norms, ideas and practices of migration management through the implementation of the mobility partnerships in Moldova and Georgia.
Comp Migr Stud. 2018;6(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40878-017-0066-y. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
10
International law and human rights: trends concerning international migrants and refugees.国际法与人权:关于国际移民和难民的趋势
Int Migr Rev. 1989 Fall;23(3):526-46.

引用本文的文献

1
Rethinking Vulnerability as a Radically Ethical Device: Ethical Vulnerability Analysis and the EU's "Migration Crisis".将脆弱性重新思考为一种根本的伦理手段:伦理脆弱性分析与欧盟的“移民危机”
Hum Rights Rev. 2023 Jun 14:1-26. doi: 10.1007/s12142-023-00685-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Heterarchies: Reconciling Networks and Hierarchies.层次结构:协调网络和层次结构。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2016 Aug;31(8):622-632. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.04.009. Epub 2016 May 24.