Kumeh Eric Mensah, Ramcilovic-Suominen Sabaheta
Bioeconomy and Environment Unit, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Itäinen Pitkäkatu 4 A, 20520 Turku, Finland.
Leverhulme Centre for Nature Recovery, Environmental Change Institute, School of Geography and Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sustain Sci. 2023;18(2):599-616. doi: 10.1007/s11625-023-01302-7. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
This paper critically examines the European Union's (EU) role in tropical deforestation and the bloc's actions to mitigate it. We focus on two EU policy communications aimed at the challenge: stepping up EU action to protect and restore the world's forests and the EU updated bioeconomy strategy. In addition, we refer to the European Green Deal, which articulates the bloc's overarching vision for sustainability and transformations. We find that by casting deforestation as a production problem and a governance challenge on the supply side, these policies deflect attention from some of the key drivers of tropical deforestation-the EU's overconsumption of deforestation-related commodities and asymmetric market and trade power relations. The diversion allows the EU unfettered access to agro-commodities and biofuels, which are important inputs to the EU's green transition and bio-based economy. Upholding a 'sustainability image' within the EU, an overly business-as-usual approach has taken precedence over transformative policies, enabling multinational corporations to run an ecocide treadmill, rapidly obliterating tropical forests. Whereas the EU's plan to nurture a bioeconomy and promote responsible agro-commodities production in the global South are relevant, the bloc is evasive in setting firm targets and policy measures to overcome the inequalities that spring from and enable its overconsumption of deforestation-related commodities. Drawing on degrowth and decolonial theories, we problematise the EU's anti-deforestation policies and highlight alternative ideas that could lead to more just, equitable and effective measures for confronting the tropical deforestation conundrum.
本文批判性地审视了欧盟在热带森林砍伐中的作用以及该集团为减轻森林砍伐所采取的行动。我们重点关注针对这一挑战的两项欧盟政策通报:加强欧盟保护和恢复世界森林的行动以及欧盟更新后的生物经济战略。此外,我们还提及了欧洲绿色协议,该协议阐述了欧盟对可持续发展和转型的总体愿景。我们发现,通过将森林砍伐视为生产问题和供应方的治理挑战,这些政策转移了对热带森林砍伐一些关键驱动因素的关注——欧盟对与森林砍伐相关商品的过度消费以及不对称的市场和贸易权力关系。这种转移使欧盟能够不受限制地获取农业商品和生物燃料,而这些是欧盟绿色转型和生物基经济的重要投入。在欧盟内部维持“可持续发展形象”的过程中,一种过于照常营业的方式优先于变革性政策,使得跨国公司能够陷入生态灭绝的循环,迅速破坏热带森林。虽然欧盟培育生物经济和促进全球南方负责任农业商品生产的计划具有相关性,但该集团在设定坚定目标和政策措施以克服因其对与森林砍伐相关商品的过度消费而产生并助长的不平等方面却避而不谈。借鉴去增长和非殖民化理论,我们对欧盟的反森林砍伐政策提出质疑,并强调一些替代理念,这些理念可能会带来更公正、公平和有效的措施来应对热带森林砍伐难题。