Mejia Alfonso, Lichtig Asher Eli, Ghosh Arnab, Balasubramaniyan Akshay, Mass Daniel, Amirouche Farid
Chicago Department of Orthopaedics, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL.
Chicago Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL.
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2023 Apr 6;5(4):407-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.03.007. eCollection 2023 Jul.
Discrepancies exist between previous biomechanical and clinical studies when determining acceptable metacarpal shortening after metacarpal fractures. This study aimed to determine the amount of acceptable shortening after a metacarpal fracture before finger motion and strength is compromised.
We defrosted ten fresh-frozen cadaveric hands. A screw-driven external fixator was placed to stabilize the metacarpal, then a 15.0-mm section of the index metacarpal was excised and replaced with a three dimensional-printed, custom-designed polyethylene insert. The hand was then mounted on a custom testing rig, and the index finger was flexed using the flexor digitorum profundus tendon. Joint angles and fingertip force were recorded as the finger was flexed. Incrementally smaller inserts were placed, and testing was repeated.
The average joint angles of the intact condition for the metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, and distal interphalangeal joints were (54 [SD = 13], 79 [SD = 21], and 73 [SD = 10]), respectively. There were no statistically significant changes to any joint angle with any amount of shortening. The maximal fingertip contact pressures were 41 N (17), 31 N (12), 24 N (14), 19 N, (11), and 14 N (8) for the 15 mm, 12.5 mm, 10 mm, 7.5 mm, and 5 mm inserts, respectively. All changes in fingertip force by insert size were statistically significant.
Metacarpal shortening does not affect flexion range of motion regardless of the amount of shortening, but it significantly affects finger strength. The loss of strength after shortening was approximately 6.5% per mm of shortening for the fractured metacarpal.
When viewed in the context of the hand as a whole and the contribution of the index finger to grip being only 23.5%, it is unlikely that any shortening will significantly affect the average patient regarding grip strength. However, for a patient who requires fine motor strength, any amount of shortening may affect their finger function and needs to be addressed.
在确定掌骨骨折后可接受的掌骨缩短量时,以往的生物力学研究和临床研究结果存在差异。本研究旨在确定在手指运动和力量未受影响之前,掌骨骨折后可接受的缩短量。
我们解冻了10只新鲜冷冻的尸体手。放置一个螺旋驱动的外固定器来稳定掌骨,然后切除15.0毫米长的示指掌骨部分,并用三维打印的定制聚乙烯植入物进行替换。然后将手安装在定制的测试装置上,使用指深屈肌腱使示指弯曲。在手指弯曲时记录关节角度和指尖力。放置逐渐变小的植入物,并重复测试。
掌指关节、近端指间关节和远端指间关节在完整状态下的平均关节角度分别为(54[标准差 = 13]、79[标准差 = 21]和73[标准差 = 10])。任何程度的缩短对任何关节角度均无统计学显著变化。对于15毫米、12.5毫米、10毫米、7.5毫米和5毫米的植入物,最大指尖接触压力分别为41牛(17)、31牛(12)、24牛(14)、19牛(11)和14牛(8)。因植入物尺寸导致的指尖力的所有变化均具有统计学显著性。
无论缩短量多少,掌骨缩短均不影响屈曲运动范围,但会显著影响手指力量。骨折掌骨缩短后,每缩短1毫米力量损失约6.5%。
从整个手的角度来看,且示指对握力的贡献仅为23.5%,任何缩短量都不太可能对普通患者的握力产生显著影响。然而,对于需要精细运动力量的患者,任何程度的缩短都可能影响其手指功能,需要加以解决。