• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习对全关节置换术患者的住院时间进行术前预测和风险因素识别

Preoperative Prediction and Risk Factor Identification of Hospital Length of Stay for Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients Using Machine Learning.

作者信息

Park Jaeyoung, Zhong Xiang, Miley Emilie N, Gray Chancellor F

机构信息

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

Arthroplast Today. 2023 Jul 13;22:101166. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101166. eCollection 2023 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.artd.2023.101166
PMID:37521739
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10372176/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to improve understanding of hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in a high-efficiency, hospital-based pathway.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1401 consecutive primary and revision TJA patients across 67 patient and preoperative care characteristics from 2016 to 2019 from the institutional electronic health records. A machine learning approach, testing multiple models, was used to assess predictors of LOS.

RESULTS

The median LOS was 1 day; outpatients accounted for 16.5%, 1-day inpatient stays for 38.0%, 2-day stays for 26.4%, and 3-days or more for 19.1%. Patients characteristically fell into 1 of 3 broad categories that contained relatively similar characteristics: outpatient (0-day LOS), short stay (1- to 2-day LOS), and prolonged stay (3 days or greater). The random forest models suggested that a lower Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool score, unplanned admission or hospital transfer, and a medical history of cardiovascular disease were associated with an increased LOS. Documented narcotic use for surgery preparation prior to hospitalization and preoperative corticosteroid use were factors independently associated with a decreased LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

After TJA, most patients have either an outpatient or short-stay hospital episode. Patients who stay 2 days do not differ substantially from patients who stay 1 day, while there is a distinct group that requires prolonged admission. Our machine learning models support a better understanding of the patient factors associated with different hospital LOS categories for TJA, demonstrating the potential for improved health policy decisions and risk stratification for centers caring for complex patients.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在提高对高效、基于医院的全关节置换术(TJA)患者住院时间(LOS)的理解。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2016年至2019年机构电子健康记录中1401例连续的初次和翻修TJA患者的67项患者和术前护理特征。采用机器学习方法,测试多种模型,以评估住院时间的预测因素。

结果

中位住院时间为1天;门诊患者占16.5%,住院1天的患者占38.0%,住院2天的患者占26.4%,住院3天或更长时间的患者占19.1%。患者通常分为3大类中的1类,每类具有相对相似的特征:门诊患者(住院时间0天)、短期住院患者(住院时间1至2天)和长期住院患者(住院时间3天或更长)。随机森林模型表明,较低的风险评估和预测工具评分、非计划入院或医院转诊以及心血管疾病病史与住院时间延长有关。住院前记录的用于手术准备的麻醉药物使用和术前使用皮质类固醇是与住院时间缩短独立相关的因素。

结论

TJA术后,大多数患者为门诊或短期住院。住院2天的患者与住院1天的患者没有实质性差异,而有一个明显的群体需要延长住院时间。我们的机器学习模型有助于更好地理解与TJA不同住院时间类别相关的患者因素,证明了改善卫生政策决策和为照顾复杂患者的中心进行风险分层的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e7c/10372176/24561e7be45f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e7c/10372176/24561e7be45f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e7c/10372176/24561e7be45f/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Preoperative Prediction and Risk Factor Identification of Hospital Length of Stay for Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients Using Machine Learning.使用机器学习对全关节置换术患者的住院时间进行术前预测和风险因素识别
Arthroplast Today. 2023 Jul 13;22:101166. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101166. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Preoperative High Sleep Quality Predicts Further Decrease in Length of Stay after Total Joint Arthroplasty under Enhanced Recovery Short-stay Program: Experience in 604 Patients from a Single Team.术前高睡眠质量预测强化康复短期住院计划下全关节置换术后住院时间进一步缩短:来自单一团队的 604 例患者的经验。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Sep;14(9):1989-1997. doi: 10.1111/os.13382. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
3
Machine Learning Model Developed to Aid in Patient Selection for Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty.开发机器学习模型以辅助门诊全关节置换术的患者选择。
Arthroplast Today. 2021 Dec 8;13:13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.11.001. eCollection 2022 Feb.
4
Predictors of in-hospital length of stay among cardiac patients: A machine learning approach.心脏病人住院时间的预测因素:一种机器学习方法。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Aug 1;288:140-147. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.046. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
5
Optimal Length of Stay Following Total Joint Arthroplasty to Reduce Readmission Rates.全关节置换术后最佳住院时间以降低再入院率。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Feb;35(2):303-308.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.059. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
6
Does Participation in Virtual or In-Person Preoperative Education Relate to Reduced Length of Stay After Total Joint Arthroplasty?参与虚拟或面对面的术前教育与全关节置换术后住院时间缩短有关吗?
HSS J. 2024 Feb;20(1):83-89. doi: 10.1177/15563316231208454. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
7
Definitional Differences of 'Outpatient' Versus 'Inpatient' THA and TKA Can Affect Study Outcomes.“门诊”与“住院”全髋关节置换术(THA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)的定义差异会影响研究结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec;475(12):2917-2925. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5236-6.
8
What Factors are Associated With 90-day Episode-of-care Payments for Younger Patients With Total Joint Arthroplasty?哪些因素与年轻全关节置换术患者的90天护理期支付相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Nov;475(11):2808-2818. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5444-0. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
9
Combined total hip and knee arthroplasty during the same hospital admission: is it safe?同期行全髋关节和全膝关节置换术:安全吗?
Bone Joint J. 2019 May;101-B(5):573-581. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B5.BJJ-2018-1438.
10
RAPT Scores Predict Inpatient Versus Outpatient Status and Readmission Rates After IPO Changes for Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 12,348 Cases.RAPT 评分可预测全膝关节置换术后 IPO 改变后的住院与门诊状态和再入院率:12348 例分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Nov;37(11):2140-2148. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.05.037. Epub 2022 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperatively predicting failure to achieve the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit for total knee arthroplasty patients using machine learning.使用机器学习对全膝关节置换术患者术前预测未能达到最小临床重要差异和实质性临床获益的情况。
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2025 Sep 10;37(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s43019-025-00289-y.
2
Duration of Hospitalization for Hip Arthroplasty: Influence of Clinical-Biological Factors and Timing of the Intervention.髋关节置换术的住院时间:临床生物学因素及干预时机的影响
Cureus. 2025 May 11;17(5):e83876. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83876. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Efficacy and Safety of a Patient Selection Tool for Predicted Discharge at an Ambulatory Surgical Center: A Pilot Study.

本文引用的文献

1
RAPT Scores Predict Inpatient Versus Outpatient Status and Readmission Rates After IPO Changes for Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 12,348 Cases.RAPT 评分可预测全膝关节置换术后 IPO 改变后的住院与门诊状态和再入院率:12348 例分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Nov;37(11):2140-2148. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.05.037. Epub 2022 May 19.
2
Increased length of stay following total joint arthroplasty based on insurance type.基于保险类型的全关节置换术后住院时间延长。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 May;143(5):2273-2281. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04417-1. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
3
Length of Stay Increases 90-day Readmission Rates in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.
门诊手术中心预测出院患者选择工具的有效性和安全性:一项试点研究。
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Aug 12;29:101421. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101421. eCollection 2024 Oct.
初次全关节置换术后患者的住院时间延长会增加 90 天再入院率。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2022 Mar 16;6(3):e21.00271. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00271.
4
Tailored risk assessment of 90-day acute heart failure readmission or all-cause death to heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction.针对射血分数保留型与射血分数降低型心力衰竭患者,进行 90 天内因急性心力衰竭再入院或全因死亡的个体化风险评估。
Clin Cardiol. 2022 Apr;45(4):370-378. doi: 10.1002/clc.23780. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
5
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' 2018 Removal of Total Knee Arthroplasty From the Inpatient-only List Led to Broad Changes in Hospital Length of Stays.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心 2018 年将全膝关节置换术从仅限住院治疗清单中移除,导致医院住院时间发生广泛变化。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Dec 15;29(24):1061-1067. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-01228.
6
Predictive Value of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) Score for Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Patients: A Single-Center Study.风险评估与预测工具(RAPT)评分对初次髋膝关节置换术患者的预测价值:一项单中心研究
Cureus. 2021 Mar 25;13(3):e14112. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14112.
7
Conditional permutation importance revisited.条件排列重要性再探。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2020 Jul 14;21(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-03622-2.
8
The Removal of Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty From the Inpatient-Only List Increases the Administrative Burden of Surgeons and Continues to Cause Confusion.将全髋关节和全膝关节置换术从仅限住院患者名单中移除增加了外科医生的行政负担,并继续造成混乱。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Oct;35(10):2772-2778. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.079. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
9
The Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) after Hip and Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review.髋膝关节置换术后风险评估与预测工具(RAPT):一项系统评价
Joints. 2019 Jul 25;7(2):41-45. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693459. eCollection 2019 Jun.
10
Comparative responsiveness of the PROMIS-10 Global Health and EQ-5D questionnaires in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.接受全膝关节置换术患者的 PROMIS-10 全球健康和 EQ-5D 问卷的比较反应性。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Jul;101-B(7):832-837. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B7.BJJ-2018-1543.R1.