• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专业知识应对有限的多边主义:以韩国通过 COVAX 设施获得 COVID-19 疫苗的疫苗采购工作队为例。

Expertise as a Response to Limited Multilateralism: The Case of South Korea's Vaccine Procurement Task Force for COVID-19 Vaccines amid Unequal Access via the COVAX Facility.

机构信息

Princeton University.

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 2024 Feb 1;49(1):99-132. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10910224.

DOI:10.1215/03616878-10910224
PMID:37522333
Abstract

This study investigates South Korea's trials and errors in procuring COVID-19 vaccines from abroad, amid the limitations of a multilateral scheme for global provision through the COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access (COVAX) program via the World Health Organization (WHO) and the discussions on COVID-19 vaccine patent waivers at the World Trade Organization. Using the framework of "self-help" in the international system and country categorization to explicate country behaviors by state-business relations and expertise to explain South Korea's COVID-19 vaccine procurement process, this study argues that in the absence of a global mechanism that guarantees adequate and timely vaccine provision, countries are left to the sole option of depending on their own capabilities: expertise, budget, and policy planning by consolidating public and private capacities to acquire vaccines for the public. To support the argument, an in-depth case investigation of South Korea's Vaccine Procurement Task Force is presented. The case study focuses on the policy assessment of critical elements in South Korea's vaccine procurement and rollout on facing obstacles to sufficient procurement through COVAX: decision-making impacting the timing and dosage of procurement, diplomatic and business channels to sign bilateral contracts, setup of a smart-factory vaccination hub, and indigenous vaccine development for WHO approval.

摘要

本研究考察了韩国在通过世界卫生组织(WHO)的 COVID-19 疫苗全球获取(COVAX)计划等多边方案获取 COVID-19 疫苗方面的尝试和错误,以及在世界贸易组织(WTO)讨论 COVID-19 疫苗专利豁免的情况下。本研究使用国际体系中的“自助”框架和国家分类,通过国家-企业关系和专业知识来解释国家行为,以解释韩国的 COVID-19 疫苗采购过程,认为在缺乏保证充足和及时疫苗供应的全球机制的情况下,各国只能依靠自己的能力:通过整合公共和私人能力为公众获取疫苗,来巩固专业知识、预算和政策规划。为了支持这一论点,对韩国疫苗采购工作队进行了深入的案例调查。案例研究侧重于评估韩国疫苗采购和推出过程中面临的关键因素:通过 COVAX 进行充分采购的决策影响采购的时机和剂量、签署双边合同的外交和商业渠道、建立智能工厂疫苗接种中心以及为获得世卫组织批准的本土疫苗开发。

相似文献

1
Expertise as a Response to Limited Multilateralism: The Case of South Korea's Vaccine Procurement Task Force for COVID-19 Vaccines amid Unequal Access via the COVAX Facility.专业知识应对有限的多边主义:以韩国通过 COVAX 设施获得 COVID-19 疫苗的疫苗采购工作队为例。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2024 Feb 1;49(1):99-132. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10910224.
2
International Collaboration to Ensure Equitable Access to Vaccines for COVID-19: The ACT-Accelerator and the COVAX Facility.国际合作确保公平获取 COVID-19 疫苗:ACT-Accelerator 和 COVAX 设施。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):426-449. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12503. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
3
Six Pivotal Lessons Learned in South Korea for Whole-of-Government Approach to Successful COVID-19 Vaccine Rollout in Planetary Health.在行星健康领域,韩国采取的政府整体措施在成功推出 COVID-19 疫苗方面汲取的六大关键经验。
OMICS. 2022 Oct;26(10):567-579. doi: 10.1089/omi.2022.0064. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
4
COVAX, vaccine donations and the politics of global vaccine inequity.新冠疫苗全球获取机制、疫苗捐赠与全球疫苗不平等的政治问题
Global Health. 2022 Mar 5;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00801-z.
5
Corruption risks in COVID-19 vaccine deployment: lessons learned for future pandemic preparedness.2019冠状病毒病疫苗部署中的腐败风险:对未来大流行防范工作的经验教训
Global Health. 2025 Mar 7;21(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12992-025-01096-6.
6
Systematic assessment of South Korea's capabilities to control COVID-19.韩国控制 COVID-19 能力的系统评估。
Health Policy. 2021 May;125(5):568-576. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
7
Mitigating donor interests in the case of COVID-19 vaccine: the implication of COVAX and DAC membership.减轻 COVID-19 疫苗供应方的利益考量:COVAX 和 DAC 成员资格的影响。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Jan;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010188.
8
COVID-19 Vaccines: How Efficient and Equitable Was the Initial Vaccination Process?新冠疫苗:初始疫苗接种过程的效率和公平性如何?
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Dec 20;11(1):11. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11010011.
9
South Korea's low fertility raises European-style issues.韩国的低生育率引发了类似欧洲的问题。
Popul Today. 1991 Oct;19(10):3.
10
COVAX and equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines.新冠疫苗实施计划与公平获取疫苗。
Bull World Health Organ. 2022 May 1;100(5):315-328. doi: 10.2471/BLT.21.287516. Epub 2022 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
COVID-19 Vaccination and Public Health: Addressing Global, Regional, and Within-Country Inequalities.2019冠状病毒病疫苗接种与公共卫生:应对全球、区域和国家内部的不平等问题
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Aug 4;12(8):885. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12080885.