• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基础-餐时胰岛素治疗转换为每日两次胰岛素德谷门冬双胰岛素复方制剂加门冬胰岛素治疗对2型糖尿病控制不佳患者的疗效

Efficacy of switching from basal-bolus insulin therapy to twice-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart co-formulation plus insulin aspart in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.

作者信息

Güneş E, Güneş M

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Health Sciences University, Bursa State Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Jul;27(14):6691-6699. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202307_33139.

DOI:10.26355/eurrev_202307_33139
PMID:37522680
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of twice-daily (BID) insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) co-formulation + once-daily (OD) bolus insulin aspart (IAsp) injection (IDegAsp BID-Plus) as simplified intensive insulin therapy in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with basal-bolus insulin therapy (BBIT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The retrospective study included 155 patients who switched from BBIT to IDegAsp BID-Plus. After the initiation of the treatment, 73 patients continued regular follow-up and insulin doses, number of injections, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, and other parameters were recorded from their files at baseline, 24, and 52 weeks.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study population was 54.3±10.2 years, the duration of T2DM was 9.7±5.7 years, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was 252.7±66.7 mg/dl, and HbA1c levels were 10.5±1.5%. Among the included patients, 15 patients received five injections, 51 patients received four injections, and 7 patients received three injections per day. There was a significant decrease in HbA1c (respectively; 10.46±1.54%, 7.97±1.24%, 7.98±1.23%, baseline and 6th-month p<0.001, baseline and 12th-month p<0.001), FPG (respectively; 251.6±66.5 mg/dl, 136.1±34.7 mg/dl, 125.4±67.0  mg/dl, baseline and 6th-month p<0.001, baseline and 12th-month p<0.001) and daily dose of insulin (respectively; 102.9±29.0 Unit, 73.2±18.2 U,  63.7±20.3 Unit, baseline and 6th-month p<0.001, baseline and 12th-month p<0.001) at the end of week 24 and 52.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on real-world data, this study demonstrated that IDegAsp BID-Plus treatment provides rapid and sustainable blood glucose control with lower insulin doses and fewer injections than previous intensive insulin therapy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估每日两次(BID)的德谷胰岛素/门冬胰岛素(IDegAsp)复方制剂联合每日一次(OD)的门冬胰岛素(IAsp)推注(IDegAsp BID-Plus)作为简化强化胰岛素治疗方案,用于基础-餐时胰岛素治疗(BBIT)控制不佳的2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的疗效。

患者与方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了155例从BBIT转换为IDegAsp BID-Plus治疗的患者。治疗开始后,73例患者继续接受常规随访,并从其病历中记录基线、24周和52周时的胰岛素剂量、注射次数、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平及其他参数。

结果

研究人群的平均年龄为54.3±10.2岁,T2DM病程为9.7±5.7年,空腹血糖(FPG)为252.7±66.7mg/dl,HbA1c水平为10.5±1.5%。在纳入的患者中,15例患者每日接受5次注射,51例患者每日接受4次注射,7例患者每日接受3次注射。在第24周和52周结束时,HbA1c(分别为:基线时10.46±1.54%、第6个月时7.97±1.24%、第12个月时7.98±1.23%,基线与第6个月相比p<0.001,基线与第12个月相比p<0.001)、FPG(分别为:基线时251.6±66.5mg/dl、第6个月时136.1±34.7mg/dl、第12个月时125.4±67.0mg/dl,基线与第6个月相比p<0.001,基线与第12个月相比p<0.001)和胰岛素每日剂量(分别为:基线时102.9±29.0单位、第6个月时73.2±18.2U、第12个月时63.7±20.3单位,基线与第6个月相比p<0.001,基线与第12个月相比p<0.001)均显著下降。

结论

基于真实世界数据,本研究表明,与之前的强化胰岛素治疗相比,IDegAsp BID-Plus治疗能以更低的胰岛素剂量和更少的注射次数实现快速且可持续的血糖控制。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of switching from basal-bolus insulin therapy to twice-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart co-formulation plus insulin aspart in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.基础-餐时胰岛素治疗转换为每日两次胰岛素德谷门冬双胰岛素复方制剂加门冬胰岛素治疗对2型糖尿病控制不佳患者的疗效
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Jul;27(14):6691-6699. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202307_33139.
2
Efficacy of the Novel Degludec/Aspart Insulin Co-formulation in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: A Real-life Experience with One Year of IDegAsp Therapy in Poorly Controlled and Non-compliant Patients.新型德谷胰岛素/门冬胰岛素复方制剂在 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年患者中的疗效:在控制不佳和不依从患者中应用 IDegAsp 治疗 1 年的真实经验。
J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2022 Mar 3;14(1):10-16. doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2021.2021.0113. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
3
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal or pre-/self-mixed insulin: a 26-week, randomised, treat-to-target trial.德谷胰岛素/门冬胰岛素与预混胰岛素类似物 30 在亚洲 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效比较:一项 26 周、随机、以目标为导向的临床试验,这些患者在接受基础或预混/自我混合胰岛素治疗后血糖控制仍不达标。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015 Jan;107(1):139-47. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.09.026. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
4
Safety and efficacy of insulin degludec/insulin aspart with bolus mealtime insulin aspart compared with standard basal-bolus treatment in people with Type 1 diabetes: 1-year results from a randomized clinical trial (BOOST T1).德谷胰岛素/门冬胰岛素与餐时大剂量门冬胰岛素联合使用相较于标准基础-餐时胰岛素治疗方案在1型糖尿病患者中的安全性和有效性:一项随机临床试验(BOOST T1)的1年结果
Diabet Med. 2017 Feb;34(2):167-173. doi: 10.1111/dme.13068. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
5
Treatment intensification with an insulin degludec (IDeg)/insulin aspart (IAsp) co-formulation twice daily compared with basal IDeg and prandial IAsp in type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled phase III trial.与基础胰岛素德谷胰岛素(IDeg)和餐时胰岛素门冬胰岛素(IAsp)相比,每日两次使用德谷胰岛素(IDeg)/门冬胰岛素(IAsp)共混制剂强化治疗2型糖尿病:一项随机对照III期试验。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Mar;18(3):274-80. doi: 10.1111/dom.12609. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
6
Similar glycaemic control with less nocturnal hypoglycaemia in a 38-week trial comparing the IDegAsp co-formulation with insulin glargine U100 and insulin aspart in basal insulin-treated subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.在一项 38 周的试验中,与甘精胰岛素 U100 和门冬胰岛素相比,德谷胰岛素/门冬胰岛素预混 38 每日一次治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的夜间低血糖发生率更低,血糖控制更相似。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Jan;147:157-165. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.10.024. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
7
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/aspart (twice-daily injections), insulin glargine 300 U/mL, and insulin glulisine (basal-bolus therapy).比较德谷胰岛素门冬胰岛素(每日两次注射)、甘精胰岛素 300U/mL 和赖脯胰岛素(基础-餐时胰岛素方案)的疗效和安全性。
J Diabetes Investig. 2019 Nov;10(6):1527-1536. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13038. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
8
Comparison of insulin degludec/insulin aspart and biphasic insulin aspart 30 in uncontrolled, insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a phase 3a, randomized, treat-to-target trial.胰岛素德谷胰岛素/门冬胰岛素与门冬胰岛素 30 治疗未经控制的、胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病的比较:一项 3a 期、随机、靶向治疗的试验。
Diabetes Care. 2014 Aug;37(8):2084-90. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2908. Epub 2014 May 8.
9
Intensification of IDegAsp Twice Daily (Adding Insulin Aspart vs. Switching To Basal-Bolus): Exploratory Randomized Trial in Type 2 Diabetes.德谷门冬胰岛素每日两次强化治疗(加用门冬胰岛素对比转换为基础-餐时胰岛素治疗):2型糖尿病的探索性随机试验
Diabetes Ther. 2017 Feb;8(1):197-205. doi: 10.1007/s13300-016-0213-8. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
10
Efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes: A phase III, open-label, 2:1 randomized, treat-to-target trial.中文 2 型糖尿病患者中德谷胰岛素/门冬胰岛素与精蛋白锌重组赖脯胰岛素 30 疗效和安全性的比较:一项 III 期、开放标签、2:1 随机、目标导向治疗的试验。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Jul;21(7):1652-1660. doi: 10.1111/dom.13703. Epub 2019 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy, safety and treatment satisfaction of transition to a regimen of insulin degludec/aspart: A pilot study.转换为德谷胰岛素/门冬胰岛素方案的疗效、安全性及治疗满意度:一项试点研究。
World J Diabetes. 2025 Jan 15;16(1):95209. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i1.95209.